Kendrick v. County of San Diego et al

Filing 12

Order Following Early Neutral Evaluation Conference, Setting Rule 26 Compliance and Notice of Case Management Conference. Early Neutral Evaluation Conference held on 3/2/16. Counsel are ordered to participate in a telephonic attorney-only case management conference with United States Magistrate Judge Ruben B. Brooks on May 5, 2016, at 8:30 a.m. Counsel for Plaintiff is to initiate the call. Signed by Magistrate Judge Ruben B. Brooks on 3/2/16.(dlg)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19

Case No.: 15cv2615 GPC(RBB)

CYNTHIA KENDRICK, individually and
as successor in interest to her now
deceased husband, GARY KENDRICK,

ORDER FOLLOWING EARLY
NEUTRAL EVALUATION
CONFERENCE, SETTING RULE 26
COMPLIANCE AND NOTICE OF
CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE

Plaintiff,
v.
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO; SAN
DIEGO SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT;
SAN DIEGO SHERIFF WILLIAM
GORE; SAN DIEGO SHERIFF'S
DEPUTY STEVEN BLOCK; DOES 150,
Defendants.

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

On March 2, 2016, the Court held an early neutral evaluation conference in the
above-entitled action. Settlement could not be reached in the case.
The Court discussed compliance with rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure and issues the following orders:
1.

No objections were presented to initial disclosure under Federal Rule of

Civil Procedure, rule 26(a)(1)(A-D). The parties are ordered to proceed with the initial

28
1
15cv2615 GPC(RBB)

1

disclosure process. Any objections to initial disclosure will be resolved as required by

2

rule 26.

3

2.

The rule 26(f) conference shall be completed on or before March 28, 2016.

4

3.

A joint discovery plan shall be lodged with Magistrate Judge Brooks on or

5
6

before April 7, 2016.
4.

The initial disclosures pursuant to rule 26(a)(1)(A-D) shall occur on or

7

before April 11, 2016. Any motions addressing disputes related to initial disclosures

8

shall be filed no later than thirty (30) days following the date the disclosures were due.

9

The 30-day deadline will not be extended without a prior Court order; counsel cannot

10

unilaterally extend the deadline. For example, ongoing meet-and-confer efforts or

11

supplemental disclosures do not extend the deadline. A failure to comply may bar the

12

party from filing a corresponding motion.

13

5.

Counsel are ordered to participate in a telephonic attorney-only case

14

management conference pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b) with United

15

States Magistrate Judge Ruben B. Brooks on May 5, 2016, at 8:30 a.m. Counsel for

16

Plaintiff is to initiate the call.

17
18

Plaintiff's(s') counsel shall serve a copy of this order on all parties that enter this
case after the date of this order.

19

Failure of any counsel or party to comply with this order may result in sanctions.

20

IT IS SO ORDERED.

21
22

Dated: March 2, 2016

23
24
25
26
27
28

cc:
Judge Curiel
All Parties of Record
2
15cv2615 GPC(RBB)