Covarrubias v. Colvin
Filing
20
ORDER (1) Adopting 19 Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, (2) Denying 14 Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment and (3) Granting 16 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. This Court, having reviewed de novo the Magis trate Judge's R&R, adopts the Magistrate Judge's recommendation in full and DENIES Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment and GRANTS Defendant's motion for summary judgment. The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment accordingly, and terminate this case. Signed by Judge Dana M. Sabraw on 1/19/2017.(aef)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
HECTOR AYON COVARRUBIAS,
11
Plaintiff,
v.
12
13
14
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting
Commissioner of Social Security,
15
Defendant.
CASE NO. 15cv2664 DMS (WVG)
ORDER (1) ADOPTING
MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT
AND RECOMMENDATION, (2)
DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND
(3) GRANTING DEFENDANT’S
MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT
16
17
On November 25, 2015, Plaintiff Hector Ayon Covarrubias filed a Complaint for
18 Judicial Review of Final Administrative Decision of the Commissioner of Social
19 Security. The parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment, and on November 17,
20 2016, Magistrate Judge William V. Gallo issued a Report and Recommendation
21 (“R&R”) recommending that the Court deny Plaintiff’s motion and grant Defendants’
22 motion. Neither side has filed objections to the R&R, and the time for doing so has
23 expired.
24
This Court, having reviewed de novo the Magistrate Judge’s R&R, adopts the
25 Magistrate Judge’s recommendation in full and DENIES Plaintiff’s motion for
26 / / /
27 / / /
28 / / /
-1-
15cv2664
1 summary judgment and GRANTS Defendant’s motion for summary judgment. The
2 Clerk of Court shall enter judgment accordingly, and terminate this case.
3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4 DATED: January 19, 2017
5
6
7
HON. DANA M. SABRAW
United States District Judge
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
15cv2664
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?