Tarr v. Harris

Filing 12

ORDER (1) Adopting 11 Report and Recommendation and (2) Denying 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. The Court adopts the R&R in its entirety. Because Petitioner has not "made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right[,] " the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). The Clerk of the Court shall enter the judgment accordingly and terminate this case. Signed by Judge Dana M. Sabraw on 6/1/2017.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(aef)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12
13

Case No. 16-CV-93 DMS (KSC)

BRYAN TARR,
Petitioner,
v.

14

ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA,

15

ORDER (1) ADOPTING REPORT
AND RECOMMENDATION AND
(2) DENYING PETITION FOR
WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

Respondent.

16
17
18

On January 14, 2016, Petitioner Bryan Tarr, proceeding pro se, filed a Petition

19

for Writ of Habeas Corpus challenging his judgment of conviction in San Diego

20

Superior Court Case No. EDD7332 for contempt as a result of his failure to make

21

complete spousal support payments. On April 11, 2017 Magistrate Judge Karen

22

Crawford issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) recommending that the

23

Court deny the Petition. Petitioner did not file objections to the R&R.

24

Having reviewed de novo the Magistrate Judge’s R&R, the Court adopts the

25

R&R in its entirety. Because Petitioner has not “made a substantial showing of the

26

denial of a constitutional right[,]” the Court declines to issue a certificate of

27

appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). The Clerk of the Court shall enter the

28

judgment accordingly and terminate this case.
–1–

16-CV-93 DMS (KSC)

1
2

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: June 1, 2017

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
–2–

16-CV-93 DMS (KSC)