Smiley v. Hologic, Inc. et al
Filing
68
ORDER granting in part 67 Joint Motion to Extend Deadline to Address Discovery Dispute Regarding Supplemental Responses. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mitchell D. Dembin on 08/02/2017. (ja1)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
Case No.: 16-cv-0158-WQH-MDD
KARMEN SMILEY,
Plaintiff,
13
14
v.
15
16
HOLOGIC, INC.,
Defendant.
17
ORDER ON JOINT MOTION TO
EXTEND DEADLINE TO
ADDRESS DISCOVERY DISPUTE
REGARDING SUPPLEMENTAL
RESPONSES
[ECF NO. 67]
18
19
20
Before the Court is the Joint Motion to Extend the Deadline to Address
21
Discovery Dispute Re: Supplemental Discovery Responses filed on August 1,
22
2017. (ECF No. 67). The Joint Motion is GRANTED IN PART as provided
23
below.
24
25
26
LEGAL STANDARD
Rule 26(e)(1)(A), Fed. R. Civ. P., governs supplementation of disclosures
and responses. It provides:
1
16-cv-0158-WQH-MDD
1
A party who has made a disclosure under Rule 26(a) –
or who has responded to an interrogatory, request for
production, or request for admission – must
supplement or correct its disclosure or response . . . in a
timely manner if the party learns that in some
material respect the disclosure or response is
incomplete or incorrect, and if the additional or
corrective information has not otherwise been made
known to the other parties during the discovery process
or in writing….
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Should a party fail to timely supplement a disclosure or response, Rule
9
37(c)(1), Fed. R. Civ. P., provides the available remedies, as follows:
If a party fails to provide information or identify a
witness as required by Rule 26(a) or (e), the party is
not allowed to use that information or witness to
supply evidence on a motion, at a hearing, or at a trial,
unless the failure was substantially justified or is
harmless.
10
11
12
13
14
Additional sanctions also are available for failing timely to supplement a
15
disclosure or response. See Rule 37(c)(1)(A)-(C).
16
17
DISCUSSION
Discovery in this case closed on September 1, 2016. (ECF No. 10 ¶ 3).
18
The time to bring before the Court any disputes regarding the adequacy of
19
discovery responses is long past. According to the Joint Motion, Plaintiff has
20
provided Defendant with a number of supplemental responses and Defendant
21
has requested that Plaintiff provide further supplemental responses to
22
previously served discovery. See Joint Motion at 2 (ECF No. 67 at 2). The
23
parties appear to be meeting and conferring regarding the supplemental
24
responses but seek leave of Court to bring any disputes regarding
25
supplemental responses before the Court no later than September 15, 2017.
26
Id. at 2-3.
2
16-cv-0158-WQH-MDD
1
Supplemental responses or disclosures are a one-way street: the burden
2
is placed upon the producing party to supplement responses or disclosures in
3
a timely manner upon finding that their initial responses or disclosures are
4
materially incomplete or inaccurate. See Rule 26(e)(1)(A). The receiving
5
party cannot compel supplemental disclosures or responses nor is there a
6
procedural vehicle for the receiving party to challenge the sufficiency of a
7
supplemental disclosure. The receiving party is limited to challenging
8
supplemental disclosures or responses as untimely. See Rule 37(c)(1). The
9
producing party carries the burden of convincing the Court that the
10
supplemental disclosures or responses are timely and, if not, the untimeliness
11
is substantially justified or harmless. Id.
12
The sufficiency of a supplemental response or disclosure only comes into
13
play if a party seeks to introduce evidence that the other party claims was
14
not previously disclosed in response to or in a supplement to a previous
15
discovery request. That is a matter for the district court to determine in
16
considering whether that evidence must be excluded under Rule 37(c)(1).
17
CONCLUSION
18
The Joint Motion is GRANTED IN PART. The parties may bring
19
before this Court any disputes regarding the timeliness of supplemental
20
disclosures or responses within thirty (30) days of the service of the
21
supplemental disclosures or responses.
22
IT IS SO ORDERED.
23
Dated: August 2, 2017
24
25
26
3
16-cv-0158-WQH-MDD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?