Daimler AG v. A-Z Wheels LLC et al
Filing
130
Amended Scheduling Order Regulating Pre-Trial Proceedings [ECF No. 129 ]. A Memoranda of Contentions of Fact and Law is due by 6/24/2021. The Proposed Pretrial Order is due by 7/22/2021. The Final Pretrial Conference is set for 7/29/2021 at 1:30 PM in Courtroom 4D before Judge Janis L. Sammartino. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mitchell D. Dembin on 4/26/2021. (tcf)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
DAIMLER AG, a German
corporation,
v.
AMENDED SCHEDULING
ORDER REGULATING PRETRIAL PROCEEDINGS
A-Z WHEELS, LLC d/b/a
USARim.com, et al.,
[ECF No. 129]
Plaintiff,
Defendants.
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Case No.: 16cv0875-JLS-MDD
The parties filed a joint motion to continue all remaining dates in the
Court’s Scheduling Order Regulating Pre-Trial Proceedings. (ECF No. 129).
Upon due consideration and good cause appearing, the Court GRANTS the
joint motion. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
1.
Counsel shall file their Memoranda of Contentions of Fact and
Law and take any other action required by Local Rule 16.1(f)(2) by June 24,
2021.
2.
Counsel shall comply with the pre-trial disclosure requirements of
Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(3) by July 1, 2021. Failure to comply with these
disclosure requirements could result in evidence preclusion or other sanctions
1
16cv0875-JLS-MDD
1
2
under Fed. R. Civ. P. 37.
3.
Counsel shall meet and take the action required by Local Rule
3
16.1(f)(4) by July 8, 2021. At this meeting, counsel shall discuss and attempt
4
to enter into stipulations and agreements resulting in simplification of the
5
triable issues. Counsel shall exchange copies and/or display all exhibits other
6
than those to be used for impeachment. The exhibits shall be prepared in
7
accordance with Local Rule 16.1(f)(4)(c). Counsel shall note any objections
8
they have to any other parties’ Pretrial Disclosures under Fed. R. Civ. P.
9
26(a)(3). Counsel shall cooperate in the preparation of the proposed pretrial
10
11
conference order.
4.
Counsel for plaintiff will be responsible for preparing the pretrial
12
order and arranging the meetings of counsel pursuant to Civil Local Rule
13
16.1(f). By July 15, 2021, plaintiff’s counsel must provide opposing counsel
14
with the proposed pretrial order for review and approval. Opposing counsel
15
must communicate promptly with plaintiff’s attorney concerning any
16
objections to form or content of the pretrial order, and both parties shall
17
attempt promptly to resolve their differences, if any, concerning the order.
18
5.
The Proposed Final Pretrial Conference Order, including
19
objections to any other parties’ Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(3) Pretrial Disclosures
20
shall be prepared, served and lodged with the assigned district judge by July
21
22, 2021, and shall be in the form prescribed in and comply with Local Rule
22
16.1(f)(6).
23
24
25
26
27
6.
The final Pretrial Conference is scheduled on the calendar of the
Honorable Janis L. Sammartino on July 29, 2021 at 1:30PM.
7.
The parties must review the chambers’ rules for the assigned
district judge and magistrate judge.
8.
A post trial settlement conference before a magistrate judge may
2
16cv0875-JLS-MDD
1
be held within 30 days of verdict in the case.
2
3
9.
The dates and times set forth herein will not be modified except
for good cause shown.
4
10.
Briefs or memoranda in support of or in opposition to any pending
5
motion shall not exceed twenty-five (25) pages in length without leave of a
6
district court judge. No reply memorandum shall exceed ten (10) pages
7
without leave of a district court judge. Briefs and memoranda exceeding ten
8
(10) pages in length shall have a table of contents and a table of authorities
9
cited.
10
11
12
13
11.
Plaintiff’s counsel shall serve a copy of this order on all parties
that enter this case hereafter.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 26, 2021
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
3
16cv0875-JLS-MDD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?