LF Centennial Limited v. Z-Line Designs, Inc. et al
Filing
118
ORDER granting 117 Motion to Continue Mandatory Settlement Conference. Mandatory Settlement Conference to 4/25/2018 at 9:30 am before Magistrate Judge Nita L. Stormes is vacated. The parties are directed to notify Chambers once they agree upon an alternate date and the Court will reset the Mandatory Settlement Conference at that time. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nita L. Stormes on 4/20/2018. (gac)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
LF CENTENNIAL LIMITED, a British
Virgin Islands corporation,
15
16
ORDER GRANTING JOINT
MOTION TO CONTINUE DATE OF
MANDATORY SETTLEMENT
CONFERENCE
Plaintiff,
13
14
Case No.: 16cv929 JM (NLS)
v.
Z-LINE DESIGNS, INC., a Nevada
corporation; and DOES 1-100, inclusive,
[ECF No. 117]
Defendant.
17
18
19
20
By joint motion, the parties request that the Court continue the Mandatory
21
Settlement Conference (“MSC”) currently scheduled for April 25, 2018 to May 14, 2018,
22
as the royalty auditor does not anticipate completing his report until April 27, 2018. ECF
23
No. 117. The Court already previously rescheduled the MSC due to delays in completing
24
the audit. See ECF No. 111. Regardless, because the Court continues to agree that
25
review of the final audit report is a necessary prerequisite to fruitful settlement
26
discussions, the joint motion is GRANTED. However, the Court has a conflict with the
27
parties’ proposed date of May 14 and the parties have not yet agreed upon an alternate
28
date when the Court is available. Thus, the MSC hereby is VACATED, to be reset for a
1
16cv929 JM (NLS)
1
future date. The parties are directed to notify Chambers once they agree upon an
2
alternate date and the Court will reset the MSC at that time.
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 20, 2018
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
16cv929 JM (NLS)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?