LF Centennial Limited v. Z-Line Designs, Inc. et al

Filing 118

ORDER granting 117 Motion to Continue Mandatory Settlement Conference. Mandatory Settlement Conference to 4/25/2018 at 9:30 am before Magistrate Judge Nita L. Stormes is vacated. The parties are directed to notify Chambers once they agree upon an alternate date and the Court will reset the Mandatory Settlement Conference at that time. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nita L. Stormes on 4/20/2018. (gac)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 LF CENTENNIAL LIMITED, a British Virgin Islands corporation, 15 16 ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO CONTINUE DATE OF MANDATORY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE Plaintiff, 13 14 Case No.: 16cv929 JM (NLS) v. Z-LINE DESIGNS, INC., a Nevada corporation; and DOES 1-100, inclusive, [ECF No. 117] Defendant. 17 18 19 20 By joint motion, the parties request that the Court continue the Mandatory 21 Settlement Conference (“MSC”) currently scheduled for April 25, 2018 to May 14, 2018, 22 as the royalty auditor does not anticipate completing his report until April 27, 2018. ECF 23 No. 117. The Court already previously rescheduled the MSC due to delays in completing 24 the audit. See ECF No. 111. Regardless, because the Court continues to agree that 25 review of the final audit report is a necessary prerequisite to fruitful settlement 26 discussions, the joint motion is GRANTED. However, the Court has a conflict with the 27 parties’ proposed date of May 14 and the parties have not yet agreed upon an alternate 28 date when the Court is available. Thus, the MSC hereby is VACATED, to be reset for a 1 16cv929 JM (NLS) 1 future date. The parties are directed to notify Chambers once they agree upon an 2 alternate date and the Court will reset the MSC at that time. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 20, 2018 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 16cv929 JM (NLS)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?