Sandoval et al v. San Diego, County of et al

Filing 40

CLERK'S JUDGMENT. IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED. The Court finds summary judgment appropriate for each of Plaintiffs federal claims, upon which itsjurisdiction is based. The Court declines to retain supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiffs remaining state law claims, which are hereby Remanded to the San Diego Superior Court. (anh). (sjt).

Download PDF
United States District Court SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Ana Sandoval, individually and as successor in interest to Ronnie Sandoval, Jr. ; Ronnie Sandoval, Jr. individually ; Josiah Sandoval individually Civil Action No. 16cv1004-BEN-AGS Plaintiff, V. County of San Diego, a Public Entity; San Diego County Jail, a Public Entity; Romeo de Guzman, Doe 2; Maria Llamado, Doe 3; Dana Harris, Doe 4; DOES 1-100 JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE Defendant. Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The issues have been tried or heard and a decision has been rendered. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: The Court finds summary judgment appropriate for each of Plaintiffs’ federal claims, upon which its jurisdiction is based. The Court declines to retain supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiffs’ remaining state law claims, which are hereby Remanded to the San Diego Superior Court. Date: 2/6/18 CLERK OF COURT JOHN MORRILL, Clerk of Court By: s/ A. Hazard A. Hazard, Deputy

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?