Mosby v. Flynn et al
Filing
28
ORDER DISMISSING CASE Without Prejudice. Signed by Judge Roger T. Benitez on 3/23/2017. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (Certified Copy to USM) (fth)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
MAURICE MOSBY,
CDCR #T-53894,
15
16
ORDER DISMISSING CASE
WITHOUT PREJUDICE
Plaintiff,
13
14
Case No.: 3:16-cv-01019-BEN-WVG
vs.
CAPTAIN D. FLYNN, et al.
Defendants.
17
18
Maurice Mosby (“Plaintiff”) is proceeding pro se and is currently incarcerated at
19
the California Health Care Facility (“CHCF”) in Stockton. He filed a civil rights
20
Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for inadequate medical care, alleging violations
21
of the Eighth Amendment, Fourteenth Amendment, and Fifth Amendment.
22
On December 26, 2016, he filed a document entitled “Notice of
23
Declaration/Motion Requesting Dismissal of this Above Entitled Civil Claim, to be
24
Without Prejudice.” (ECF No. 24). Therein, he stated that he “moves this above court to
25
dismiss this case without prejudice and to further defer such ruling to dismiss this claim
26
until adjudication of the herein enclosed ‘Request for Appointment of counsel’ is
27
determined to be validated.” (Id.) He attached a form entitled “Inmate Request for
28
Assistance from the Court,” which applies to inmates claiming a disability. The form
1
3:16-cv-01019-BEN-WVG
1
stated that Plaintiff sought to “appoint Counsel to show Deprivation of medical access to
2
treatment/orthopedic appliance in violation of th[e] Constitution, deliberate indifference.”
3
(Id.)
4
He filed the “Inmate Request for Assistance from the Court” form again on
5
January 30, 2017. (ECF No. 26). The form is almost identical to the first filing, except
6
makes clear that Plaintiff’s disability is that he is confined to a wheelchair. He again
7
seeks appointment of counsel.
8
9
The Court construes Plaintiff’s filings to request appointment of counsel to
maintain the action, but if the request is denied, Plaintiff asks the Court to dismiss the
10
case without prejudice. Accordingly, the Court must determine whether Plaintiff is
11
entitled to counsel. It concludes that he is not.
12
Courts have discretion, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1) (1996), to appoint
13
counsel for indigent civil litigants upon a showing of exceptional circumstances. “A
14
finding of exceptional circumstances requires an evaluation of both the likelihood of
15
success on the merits and the ability of the petitioner to articulate his claims pro se in
16
light of the complexity of the legal issues involved.” Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015,
17
1017 (9th Cir. 1991) (internal citations omitted). “Neither of these factors is dispositive
18
and both must be viewed together before reaching a decision.” Id. (internal citations
19
omitted).
20
The Court denies Plaintiff’s request without prejudice because nothing suggests he
21
is incapable of articulating the factual basis for his inadequate medical care claims, which
22
appear “relatively straightforward.” Harrington v. Scribner, 785 F.3d 1299, 1309 (9th
23
Cir. 2015). Plaintiff’s Complaint survived pre-answer screening under 28 U.S.C. §
24
1915(e)(2) and § 1915A(b). However, at this initial stage of the pleadings, Plaintiff has
25
not yet shown a likelihood of success on the merits. Id. Plaintiff’s disability does not
26
compel a different result. Plaintiff’s confinement to a wheelchair has not affected his
27
ability to articulate his arguments and prosecute the case. Therefore, the Court finds no
28
“exceptional circumstances” required to justify the appointment of counsel at this time.
2
3:16-cv-01019-BEN-WVG
1
See, e.g., Cano v. Taylor, 739 F.3d 1214, 1218 (9th Cir. 2014) (affirming denial of
2
counsel where prisoner was able to articulate his inadequate medical care claims in light
3
of the complexity of the issues involved, but found unlikely to succeed on the merits).
4
Plaintiff’s request for appointment of counsel is DENIED. Pursuant to Plaintiff’s
5
request to dismiss this lawsuit if the Court does not appoint counsel, the Court
6
DISMISSES the case without prejudice.
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 23, 2017
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
3:16-cv-01019-BEN-WVG
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?