Strong v. Johnson
Filing
30
ORDER OF DISMISSAL. The consolidated action is dismissed without prejudice, but without leave to amend, for lack of jurisdiction. Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 9/29/2017.(lrf)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MATT STRONG,
12
CASE NOS. 16cv1289-LAB (JMA) and
16cv2524-LAB (JMA)
Plaintiff,
vs.
13
14
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
DIANA E. JOHNSON, TRUSTEE OF
THE DIANA E. JOHNSON TRUST
DATED JULY 25, 2013,
15
16
Defendant.
________________________________
17
DOROTHY WHITE,
Plaintiff,
18
19
20
21
22
vs.
DIANE E. JOHNSON, TRUSTEE OF
THE DIANE E. JOHNSON TRUST
DATED JULY 25, 2013,
Defendant.
23
24
Each of these consolidated cases deals with conditions in the same retail parking lot.
25
After it appeared that Defendant’s remediation of conditions mooted all federal claims and
26
the Court lacked jurisdiction over the supplemental state claims, the Court dismissed the
27
complaints. If Plaintiffs thought they still had claims over which the Court could exercise
28
jurisdiction, they were ordered to seek leave to file amended complaints. They were ordered
-1-
16cv1289/16CV2524
1
to do this no later than Tuesday, September 12, 2017, and were cautioned that if they failed
2
to do so, this consolidated action would be dismissed without leave to amend.
3
Since that time, Plaintiffs have not filed anything. The Court accepts this as their
4
concession that they have no claims the Court can exercise jurisdiction over.
The
5
consolidated action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, BUT WITHOUT LEAVE TO
6
AMEND, for lack of jurisdiction.
7
The motion for sanctions in case 16cv2524, White v. Johnson (Docket no. 12) is
8
DENIED AS MOOT. All other pending requests are DENIED AS MOOT and all pending
9
dates are VACATED.
10
11
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: September 29, 2017
12
13
HONORABLE LARRY ALAN BURNS
United States District Judge
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
16cv1289/16CV2524
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?