Alvarez v. Ko et al
Filing
107
CLERK'S JUDGMENT. IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: The Court has conducted a de novo review of the Report and finds it to be thorough, complete, and an accurate analysis of the legal issues presented in the motion for summary judgment. Therefore, the Court: (1) Adopts the Report in full; (2) Rejects Plaintiff's objections; and (3) Grants Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. It is So Ordered. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jjg)
United States District Court
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Vicente Arriga Alvarez
Civil Action No. 16-cv-1302-CAB-NLS
Plaintiff,
V.
Dr. S. Ko, M.D.; Dr. Connall McCabe,
M.D.; Dr. A. Sangha, C.M.E.; J. Lewis,
Deputy Director of Cal. Corr. Health
Care Services
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE
Defendant.
Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The issues have been tried
or heard and a decision has been rendered.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:
The Court has conducted a de novo review of the Report and finds it to be thorough, complete, and an
accurate analysis of the legal issues presented in the motion for summary judgment. Therefore, the
Court: (1) Adopts the Report in full; (2) Rejects Plaintiff’s objections; and (3) Grants Defendants’
Motion for Summary Judgment. It is So Ordered.
Date:
6/18/18
CLERK OF COURT
JOHN MORRILL, Clerk of Court
By: s/ J. Gutierrez
J. Gutierrez, Deputy
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?