Webb v. USA
Filing
2
ORDER Denying as Moot Petition to Vacate under 28 USC 2255. Movant's Motions are Denied as Moot. Signed by Judge Roger T. Benitez on 4/6/2018.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(anh)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MIKE LEE WEBB,
Case No.: 3:16-cv-01542-BEN
3:91-cr-00663-BEN-1
Movant,
12
13
v.
14
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
ORDER
(1) DENYING AS MOOT MOTION
TO VACATE, SET ASIDE, OR
CORRECT SENTENCE UNDER
28 U.S.C. § 2255; and
Respondent.
15
16
17
(2) DENYING AS MOOT
APPLICATION TO FILE A SECOND
OR SUCCESSIVE SECTION 2255
MOTION.
18
19
20
21
[Docket Nos. 129, 137]
22
23
Movant Mike Lee Webb has filed a Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct
24
Sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 and an Application for Leave to File a Second or
25
Successive Section 2255 Motion. (Docket Nos. 129, 137.)1 In short, Movant’s motions
26
27
28
1
All docket citations refer to the criminal case docket, No. 91-cr-00663-BEN-1.
1
3:16-cv-01542-BEN
3:91-cr-00663-BEN-1
1
ask the Court to vacate his previous sentence and re-sentence him, but do not challenge
2
his convictions. (See Docket No. 129 (“Because a conviction under § 844(i) is no longer
3
a crime of violence after [Johnson v. United States, 135 S. Ct. 2551 (2015)] and because
4
Mr. Webb has shown that he is otherwise entitled to relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, he
5
respectfully requests that this Court grant his motion, vacate the sentence, and re-sentence
6
him.”); Docket No. 137 (same).)
7
The Court takes judicial notice that, on December 11, 2017, while Movant’s
8
motions were pending, he was released from the Bureau of Prisons’ custody. See Federal
9
Bureau of Prisons Website, Inmate Locater Detail for Michael Lee Webb, Register No.
10
29149-198, available at https://www.bop.gov/inmateloc/; Qureshi v. Sanders, 563 F.
11
Supp. 2d 1154, 1156 n.2 (C.D. Cal. 2008) (taking judicial notice of Bureau of Prisons’
12
(“BOP’s) “Inmate Locator” website that showed petitioner’s release from BOP’s
13
custody).
14
As a result, Movant’s motions are moot. See Aaron v. Pepperas, 790 F.2d 1360,
15
1361-62 (9th Cir. 1986) (concluding petitioner’s habeas petition moot where petitioner
16
has satisfied his sentence and “merely contests the imposition and duration of his
17
sentence”). Therefore, Movant’s motions are denied.
18
IT IS SO ORDERED.
19
20
Dated: April 6, 2018
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
3:16-cv-01542-BEN
3:91-cr-00663-BEN-1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?