Owens v. USA
Filing
3
ORDER :(1) Lifting Stay; and (2) Denying as Moot Motion Under 26:USC Section 2255 to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct a Sentence [Doc. No. 65 ]. Signed by Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo on 3/25/2020.(anh)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
UNITED STATES OF AMERIA,
Case No. 97cr2546-CAB; 16cv1564CAB; 16cv1636-CAB
Plaintiff,
12
13
v.
14
REGINALD OWENS,
15
ORDER: (1) LIFTING STAY; AND 2)
DENYING AS MOOT MOTION
UNDER 28 U.S.C. SECTION 2255 TO
VACATE, SET ASIDE OR
CORRECT A SENTENCE [Doc. No.
65]
Defendant.
16
17
18
On June 21, 2016, Defendant/Petitioner filed a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to
19
vacate, set aside, or correct a sentence (the “2255 motion”). [Doc. No. 65.] On July 1,
20
2016, this Court issued an order staying the motion pending a decision by the Ninth
21
Circuit in 14-10080, United States v. Begay. [Doc. No. 67.]
22
On April 20, 2018, Defendant/Petitioner filed a motion to lift the stay in light of
23
the Supreme Court’s decision in Sessions v. Dimaya, __ S. Ct. __, 2018 WL 1800371
24
(U.S. Apr. 17, 2018). [97cr2546, Doc. No. 69.] On January 10, 2019, the Court denied
25
the motion to lift the stay. [Doc. No. 74.]
26
On July 18, 2019, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals issued an order regarding an
27
application for authorization to file a second or successive 28 U.S.C. §2255 motion filed
28
in Ninth Circuit No. 18-71013. [Doc. No. 75.] The Ninth Circuit denied the motion as
1
97cr2546-CAB; 16cv1564;16cv1636
1
unnecessary because the applicant (Petitioner Reginald Owen) already has a section 2255
2
motion pending in this Court. Id. The Ninth Circuit further ordered the proposed section
3
2255 motion be filed in this action as a motion to amend the currently pending 2255
4
motion. Id. That motion to amend is now filed in this action as docket no. 76.
5
On August 6, 2019, this Court issued an order lifting the stay to address the motion
6
to amend, and set a briefing schedule. [Doc. No. 77.] On September 12, 2019 this Court
7
issued an order denying the motion to amend and reinstating the stay. [Doc. No. 79.]
8
9
On October 21, 2019, Defendant filed a motion to reduce sentence pursuant to 18
U.S.C. §3582 (First Step Act). [Doc. No. 81.] Following further briefing by the
10
government and Defendant [Doc. Nos. 87, 90-92], the Court granted Defendant’s motion
11
to reduce sentence under the First Step Act. [Doc. No. 93.] Following a telephonic
12
hearing [Doc. No. 95], the Court issued an Amended Judgment sentencing Defendant to a
13
term of imprisonment of time served as to all counts, concurrent [Doc. No. 96], and
14
issued an Abstract of Order for Defendant to be released from custody [Doc. No. 97].
15
Given that Defendant will henceforth be released from custody, the Court
16
HEREBY ORDERS AS FOLLOWS:
17
1. The stay as to Defendant’s 2255 motion is HEREBY LIFTED;
18
2. The 2255 motion is HEREBY DISMISSED AS MOOT;
19
3. The corresponding civil cases, 16cv1564 and 16cv1636, are HEREBY
20
21
22
DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 25, 2020
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
97cr2546-CAB; 16cv1564;16cv1636
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?