Briceno v. Williams et al
Filing
128
ORDER Adopting the Report and Recommendation and DISMISSING CASE in its Entirety. Signed by Judge John A. Houston on 10/20/2022.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(smy1)
Case 3:16-cv-01665-JAH-AGS Document 128 Filed 10/20/22 PageID.1177 Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MARCUS D. BRICENO,
Case No.: 3:16-cv-01665-JAH-AGS
Plaintiff,
12
13
v.
14
BLAKE WILLIAMS SAN DIEGO
POLICE OFFICER; CHRIS
CUMMINGS, SAN DIEGO POLICE
OFFICER,
15
16
17
ORDER ADOPTING THE REPORT
AND RECOMMENDATION AND
DISMISSING CASE IN ITS
ENTIRETY
Defendants.
18
19
On August 22, 2022, Defendant Officer Blake Williams (“Defendant”) filed an Ex
20
Parte Motion to Vacate the Deadline for the Parties to Submit a Proposed Trial Schedule
21
and to Set a Status Conference. (ECF No. 123). Defendant’s motion states that although
22
Plaintiff has been released from custody, he has absconded from probation and Defendant
23
has otherwise been unable to contact Plaintiff. (Id.) Magistrate Judge Andrew G. Schloper
24
granted Defendant’s motion and set a telephonic status conference. (ECF No. 124).
25
Plaintiff did not appear for the status conference, and to date, has not updated his mailing
26
address. See CivLR 83.11.b (“If mail directed to a pro se plaintiff by the clerk at the
27
plaintiff’s last designated address is returned by the Post Office, and if such plaintiff fails
28
to notify the court and the opposing parties within 60 days thereafter of the plaintiff’s
1
3:16-cv-01665-JAH-AGS
Case 3:16-cv-01665-JAH-AGS Document 128 Filed 10/20/22 PageID.1178 Page 2 of 2
1
current address, the court may dismiss the action without prejudice for failure to
2
prosecute.”).
3
Recommendation recommending that this case be dismissed for failure to prosecute.
4
Defendant filed a Notice of Non-Opposition. (ECF No. 127).
5
6
7
On October 3, 2022, the magistrate judge submitted a Report and
Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation and dismisses
the above-captioned in its entirety case without prejudice for a failure to prosecute.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
9
DATED: October 20, 2022
10
11
12
13
_________________________________
JOHN A. HOUSTON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
3:16-cv-01665-JAH-AGS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?