Briceno v. Williams et al

Filing 67

ORDER Granting Defendant's Motion to Compel (ECF No. 62 ), Vacating August 8, 2019 Hearing, and Granting in Part Defendant's Motion to Modify the Scheduling Order. (ECF No. 65 ) The Final Pretrial Conference is reset for 3/30/2020 at 2:3 0 PM in Courtroom 13B before Judge John A. Houston. The Mandatory Settlement Conference is reset for 11/22/2019 at 2:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Andrew G. Schopler. The Proposed Pretrial Order is due by 3/23/2020.Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew G. Schopler on 8/6/2019. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (tcf)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

Marcus D. BRICENO,

11

Case No.: 16-cv-1665-JAH-AGS
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S
MOTION TO COMPEL (ECF No. 62),
VACATING AUGUST 8, 2019
HEARING, AND GRANTING IN
PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO
MODIFY THE SCHEDULING
ORDER (ECF No. 65)

Plaintiff,

12

v.

13

Blake WILLIAMS, San Diego Police
Officer, et al.,

14
15

Defendants.

16
17

Defendant Blake Williams’s unopposed motion to compel additional responses to

18

its discovery requests is granted. See Local Civ. R. 7.1.f.3.c (“If an opposing party fails to

19

file the papers in the manner required by Civil Local Rule 7.1.e.2 [requiring timely

20

opposition], that failure may constitute a consent to the granting of a motion or other

21

request for ruling by the court.”). The related August 8, 2019 hearing is vacated. Within

22

30 days, plaintiff must supplement his written discovery responses to include:

23
24

(1) Written responses to the requests for production of documents which indicate
which documents are responsive to which requests;

25

(2) Full narrative responses to each interrogatory;

26

(3) Full responses to the request for admissions; and

27

(4) A privilege log for any documents withheld on the basis of privilege.

28
1
16-cv-1665-JAH-AGS

1

Defendant Williams’s other motion, to modify the scheduling order, is likewise

2

unopposed. (See ECF No. 66 (granting plaintiff until “August 2, 2019” to “file any

3

response” to the motion).) In that motion, Williams seeks a four-month extension to all

4

deadlines. The Court concludes that, despite being unopposed, defendant has not yet set

5

out sufficient good cause to warrant such a long extension to the deadlines in this otherwise

6

straightforward case. As such, the Court grants the motion, but the new deadlines will be:

7
8
9

CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE
Event
Deadline
Fact Discovery Completion
October 23, 2019
Expert Discovery Completion

October 23, 2019

10

MSC Briefs

November 15, 2019

11

Mandatory Settlement Conference

November 22, 2019, at 2:00 p.m.

12

Pretrial Motions Deadline

November 29, 2019

13

Rule 26(a)(3) Disclosures

March 2, 2019

14

Meet and Confer on the PTO

March 9, 2019

15

Draft PTO to Defense Counsel

March 16, 2020

16

Lodge PTO

March 23, 2020

Final Pretrial Conference

March 30, 2020, at 2:30 p.m.

17
18
19
20
21

This order only modifies the dates in the scheduling order (ECF No. 46); all other
provisions remain in effect.
Dated: August 6, 2019

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
16-cv-1665-JAH-AGS