Briceno v. Williams et al
Filing
67
ORDER Granting Defendant's Motion to Compel (ECF No. 62 ), Vacating August 8, 2019 Hearing, and Granting in Part Defendant's Motion to Modify the Scheduling Order. (ECF No. 65 ) The Final Pretrial Conference is reset for 3/30/2020 at 2:3 0 PM in Courtroom 13B before Judge John A. Houston. The Mandatory Settlement Conference is reset for 11/22/2019 at 2:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Andrew G. Schopler. The Proposed Pretrial Order is due by 3/23/2020.Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew G. Schopler on 8/6/2019. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (tcf)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
Marcus D. BRICENO,
11
Case No.: 16-cv-1665-JAH-AGS
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S
MOTION TO COMPEL (ECF No. 62),
VACATING AUGUST 8, 2019
HEARING, AND GRANTING IN
PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO
MODIFY THE SCHEDULING
ORDER (ECF No. 65)
Plaintiff,
12
v.
13
Blake WILLIAMS, San Diego Police
Officer, et al.,
14
15
Defendants.
16
17
Defendant Blake Williams’s unopposed motion to compel additional responses to
18
its discovery requests is granted. See Local Civ. R. 7.1.f.3.c (“If an opposing party fails to
19
file the papers in the manner required by Civil Local Rule 7.1.e.2 [requiring timely
20
opposition], that failure may constitute a consent to the granting of a motion or other
21
request for ruling by the court.”). The related August 8, 2019 hearing is vacated. Within
22
30 days, plaintiff must supplement his written discovery responses to include:
23
24
(1) Written responses to the requests for production of documents which indicate
which documents are responsive to which requests;
25
(2) Full narrative responses to each interrogatory;
26
(3) Full responses to the request for admissions; and
27
(4) A privilege log for any documents withheld on the basis of privilege.
28
1
16-cv-1665-JAH-AGS
1
Defendant Williams’s other motion, to modify the scheduling order, is likewise
2
unopposed. (See ECF No. 66 (granting plaintiff until “August 2, 2019” to “file any
3
response” to the motion).) In that motion, Williams seeks a four-month extension to all
4
deadlines. The Court concludes that, despite being unopposed, defendant has not yet set
5
out sufficient good cause to warrant such a long extension to the deadlines in this otherwise
6
straightforward case. As such, the Court grants the motion, but the new deadlines will be:
7
8
9
CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE
Event
Deadline
Fact Discovery Completion
October 23, 2019
Expert Discovery Completion
October 23, 2019
10
MSC Briefs
November 15, 2019
11
Mandatory Settlement Conference
November 22, 2019, at 2:00 p.m.
12
Pretrial Motions Deadline
November 29, 2019
13
Rule 26(a)(3) Disclosures
March 2, 2019
14
Meet and Confer on the PTO
March 9, 2019
15
Draft PTO to Defense Counsel
March 16, 2020
16
Lodge PTO
March 23, 2020
Final Pretrial Conference
March 30, 2020, at 2:30 p.m.
17
18
19
20
21
This order only modifies the dates in the scheduling order (ECF No. 46); all other
provisions remain in effect.
Dated: August 6, 2019
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
16-cv-1665-JAH-AGS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?