Walters v. Target Corp.
Filing
150
ORDER Granting 116 , 119 , 128 , 135 Motions to File Documents Under Seal. Signed by Judge M. James Lorenz on 6/17/19. (dlg)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
JAMES WALTERS, on behalf of himself
and all others similarly situated,
Case No.: 3:16-cv-1678-L-MDD
ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO
FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL
[Doc. Nos. 116, 119, 128, 135]
Plaintiff,
v.
TARGET CORP.,
Defendant.
17
18
Pending before the Court are four unopposed motions to file under seal several
19
documents related to Defendant Target Corporation’s (‘Target”) motion for summary
20
judgment and Plaintiff James Walters’ (“Walters”) motion for class certification [docs.
21
116, 119, 128, 135]. For the reasons which follow, each motion is GRANTED.
22
Sealing court records implicates the "general right to inspect and copy public records
23
and documents, including judicial records and documents." Nixon v. Warner Commc'ns,
24
Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 597 & n.7 (1978). The lack of opposition to a motion to seal therefore
25
does not automatically resolve it. See Foltz v. State Farm Mut. Auto Ins. Co., 331 F.3d
26
1128, 1130 (9th Cir. 2003). Aside from “grand jury transcripts and warrant materials in
27
the midst of a pre-indictment investigation,” a strong presumption applies in favor of public
28
access to judicial records. Kamakana v. City and County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178
1
3:16-cv-1678-L-MDD
1
(9th Cir. 2006). Accordingly, a party seeking to seal a judicial record bears the burden of
2
overcoming the strong presumption of public access by meeting the “compelling reasons”
3
standard. Id. at 1178. Whether a party’s proffered reasons for filing documents under seal
4
are compelling is fact specific and left to the “sound discretion of the trial court.” Nixon,
5
435 U.S. at 599. “In general, compelling reasons sufficient to outweigh the public’s
6
interest in disclosure and justify sealing court records exist when such ‘court files might
7
have become a vehicle for improper purposes,’ such as the use of records to gratify private
8
spite, promote public scandal, circulate libelous statements, or release trade secrets.”
9
Kamakana, 447 F.3d at 1179.
10
Here, Walters seeks to file under seal his opposition to Target’s motion for summary
11
and certain exhibits and his reply supporting Walters’ motion for class certification and
12
certain confidential exhibits [docs. 116, 135]. Meanwhile, Target seeks to file under seal
13
its reply in support of its motion for summary judgment with corresponding exhibit and its
14
unredacted opposition to Walters’ motion for class certification and exhibits [docs. 119,
15
128]. The pleadings, transcripts, and exhibits sought to be filed under seal reference and
16
directly touch on Target’s and third party’s trade secrets, business practices, and internal
17
operating policies and procedures related to its debit card. Having reviewed the motions
18
and attached exhibits, the Court finds that public disclosure of these documents might harm
19
defendant’s competitive standing in its business. Accordingly, in its discretion, the Court
20
permits the requested documents to be filed under seal. See Nixon, 435 U.S. at 598–99.
21
The Court therefore GRANTS these motions to file the following documents under seal:
22
23
24
25
(1) Walters’ opposition to Target’s motion for summary judgment and exhibits 2-10,
12-19, 24-25 [doc. 116];
(2) Target’s unredacted reply memorandum of points and authorities and exhibit B
in support of its motion for summary judgment [doc. 118];
26
(3) Target’s opposition to Walter’s motion for class certification, exhibits D, E, and
27
F of James R. McGuire’s declaration, and exhibit A of Kristen Cook’s declaration
28
[doc. 128];
2
3:16-cv-1678-L-MDD
1
2
3
(4) Walters’ reply in support of his motion for class certification and attached
exhibits [doc. 135].
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
5
Dated: June 17, 2019
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
3:16-cv-1678-L-MDD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?