Walters v. Target Corp.

Filing 150

ORDER Granting 116 , 119 , 128 , 135 Motions to File Documents Under Seal. Signed by Judge M. James Lorenz on 6/17/19. (dlg)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 JAMES WALTERS, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Case No.: 3:16-cv-1678-L-MDD ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL [Doc. Nos. 116, 119, 128, 135] Plaintiff, v. TARGET CORP., Defendant. 17 18 Pending before the Court are four unopposed motions to file under seal several 19 documents related to Defendant Target Corporation’s (‘Target”) motion for summary 20 judgment and Plaintiff James Walters’ (“Walters”) motion for class certification [docs. 21 116, 119, 128, 135]. For the reasons which follow, each motion is GRANTED. 22 Sealing court records implicates the "general right to inspect and copy public records 23 and documents, including judicial records and documents." Nixon v. Warner Commc'ns, 24 Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 597 & n.7 (1978). The lack of opposition to a motion to seal therefore 25 does not automatically resolve it. See Foltz v. State Farm Mut. Auto Ins. Co., 331 F.3d 26 1128, 1130 (9th Cir. 2003). Aside from “grand jury transcripts and warrant materials in 27 the midst of a pre-indictment investigation,” a strong presumption applies in favor of public 28 access to judicial records. Kamakana v. City and County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178 1 3:16-cv-1678-L-MDD 1 (9th Cir. 2006). Accordingly, a party seeking to seal a judicial record bears the burden of 2 overcoming the strong presumption of public access by meeting the “compelling reasons” 3 standard. Id. at 1178. Whether a party’s proffered reasons for filing documents under seal 4 are compelling is fact specific and left to the “sound discretion of the trial court.” Nixon, 5 435 U.S. at 599. “In general, compelling reasons sufficient to outweigh the public’s 6 interest in disclosure and justify sealing court records exist when such ‘court files might 7 have become a vehicle for improper purposes,’ such as the use of records to gratify private 8 spite, promote public scandal, circulate libelous statements, or release trade secrets.” 9 Kamakana, 447 F.3d at 1179. 10 Here, Walters seeks to file under seal his opposition to Target’s motion for summary 11 and certain exhibits and his reply supporting Walters’ motion for class certification and 12 certain confidential exhibits [docs. 116, 135]. Meanwhile, Target seeks to file under seal 13 its reply in support of its motion for summary judgment with corresponding exhibit and its 14 unredacted opposition to Walters’ motion for class certification and exhibits [docs. 119, 15 128]. The pleadings, transcripts, and exhibits sought to be filed under seal reference and 16 directly touch on Target’s and third party’s trade secrets, business practices, and internal 17 operating policies and procedures related to its debit card. Having reviewed the motions 18 and attached exhibits, the Court finds that public disclosure of these documents might harm 19 defendant’s competitive standing in its business. Accordingly, in its discretion, the Court 20 permits the requested documents to be filed under seal. See Nixon, 435 U.S. at 598–99. 21 The Court therefore GRANTS these motions to file the following documents under seal: 22 23 24 25 (1) Walters’ opposition to Target’s motion for summary judgment and exhibits 2-10, 12-19, 24-25 [doc. 116]; (2) Target’s unredacted reply memorandum of points and authorities and exhibit B in support of its motion for summary judgment [doc. 118]; 26 (3) Target’s opposition to Walter’s motion for class certification, exhibits D, E, and 27 F of James R. McGuire’s declaration, and exhibit A of Kristen Cook’s declaration 28 [doc. 128]; 2 3:16-cv-1678-L-MDD 1 2 3 (4) Walters’ reply in support of his motion for class certification and attached exhibits [doc. 135]. IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 5 Dated: June 17, 2019 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 3:16-cv-1678-L-MDD

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?