Chavez v. Community Housing Solutions et al
Filing
31
Scheduling ORDER Regulating Discovery and Other Pre-Trial Proceedings granting 30 Joint Motion to Continue. Mandatory Settlement Conference set for 4/10/2018 at 10:00 a.m. in the chambers of Magistrate Judge David H. Bartick. Proposed Pretrial Order due by 5/14/2018. Final Pretrial Conference set for 5/21/2018 at 11:00 a.m. before Judge M. James Lorenz. Signed by Magistrate Judge Louisa S Porter on 09/12/2017. (ajs)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
GABRIEL CHAVEZ,
Case No.: 16-cv-2032-L (DHB)
Plaintiff,
12
13
v.
14
COMMUNITY HOUSING
SOLUTIONS; DONNA IVICEVIC d/b/a
PINE VIEW APARTMENTS; VINCENT
IVICEVIC d/b/a PINE VIEW
APARTMENTS; and DOES 1-10,
inclusive,
15
16
17
18
SCHEDULING ORDER
REGULATING DISCOVERY
AND OTHER PRE-TRIAL
PROCEEDINGS
Defendant.
19
20
21
22
23
On September 8, 2017, Defendant Community Housing Solutions filed a Joint
Motion to Continue the Court’s March 6, 2017 Scheduling Order. (ECF No. 30.)
Good
cause appearing, the Court hereby GRANTS the Joint Motion. Accordingly, the Court
24
modifies the Scheduling Order as follows:
1.
By October 23, 2017, each party shall comply with the disclosure provisions
25
in Rule 26(a)(2)(A) and (B) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This disclosure
26
requirement applies to all persons retained or specially employed to provide expert
27
testimony, or whose duties as an employee of the party regularly involve the giving of
28
expert testimony. Except as provided in the paragraph below, any party that fails to
1
16-cv-2032-L (DHB)
1
make these disclosures shall not, absent substantial justification, be permitted to use
2
evidence or testimony not disclosed at any hearing or at the time of trial. In addition,
3
the Court may impose sanctions as permitted by Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(c).
4
5
6
2.
Any party shall supplement its disclosure regarding contradictory or rebuttal
evidence under Rule 26(a)(2)(D) by November 20, 2017.
3.
All discovery shall be completed by all parties by December 18, 2017.
7
“Completed” means that all discovery under Rules 30-36 of the Federal Rules of Civil
8
Procedure, and discovery subpoenas under Rule 45, must be initiated a sufficient period of
9
time in advance of the cut-off date, so that it may be completed by the cut-off date, taking
10
into account the times for service, notice and response as set forth in the Federal Rules of
11
Civil Procedure. Counsel shall promptly and in good faith meet and confer with
12
regard to all discovery disputes in compliance with Local Rule 26.1(a). The Court
13
expects counsel to make every effort to resolve all disputes without court intervention
14
through the meet and confer process. If the parties reach an impasse on any discovery
15
issue, counsel shall file an appropriate joint motion within the time limit and according to
16
the procedures outlined in Magistrate Judge David H. Bartick’s Civil Chambers Rules,
17
which are posted on the Court’s website. A failure to comply in this regard will result
18
in a waiver of a party’s discovery issue. Absent an order of the Court, no stipulation
19
continuing or altering this requirement will be recognized by the Court.
20
4.
Please be advised that failure to comply with any discovery order of the Court
21
may result in the sanctions provided for in Fed. R. Civ. P. 37, including a prohibition on
22
23
the introduction of experts or other designated matters in evidence.
5.
All pretrial motions including those addressing Daubert issues but excluding
24
motions in limine must be filed by January 15, 2018. Counsel for the moving party must
25
obtain a motion hearing date from the law clerk of the judge who will hear the motion. The
26
period of time between the date you request a motion date and the hearing date may vary
27
from one district judge to another. Please plan accordingly. Failure to make a timely
28
request for a motion date may result in the motion not being heard. The hearing date and
2
16-cv-2032-L (DHB)
1
briefing schedule for motions in limine will be set at the Final Pretrial Conference. Each
2
motion in limine shall be accompanied by a certification that the parties met and conferred
3
in an attempt to resolve the issue.
4
6.
A Mandatory Settlement Conference shall be conducted on April 10, 2018 at
5
10:00 a.m. in the chambers of Magistrate Judge David H. Bartick. Counsel shall submit
6
settlement statements directly to Judge Bartick’s chambers by April 2, 2018.1 The parties
7
may either submit confidential settlement statements or may exchange their settlement
8
statements. Each party’s settlement statement shall set forth the party’s statement of the
9
case, identify controlling legal issues, concisely set out issues of liability and damages, and
10
shall set forth the party’s settlement position, including the last offer or demand made by
11
that party, and a separate statement of the offer or demand the party is prepared to make at
12
the settlement conference. The settlement conference briefs shall not be filed with the
13
Clerk of the Court.
14
All named parties, all counsel, and any other person(s) whose authority is
15
required to negotiate and enter into settlement shall appear in person at the
16
conference. The individual(s) present at the Mandatory Settlement Conference with
17
settlement authority must have the unfettered discretion and authority on behalf of the party
18
to: 1) fully explore all settlement options and to agree during the Mandatory Settlement
19
Conference to any settlement terms acceptable to the party (G. Heileman Brewing Co., Inc.
20
v. Joseph Oat Corp., 871 F.2d 648, 653 (7th Cir. 1989)), 2) change the settlement position
21
of a party during the course of the Mandatory Settlement Conference (Pitman v. Brinker
22
Int’l, Inc., 216 F.R.D. 481, 485-86 (D. Ariz. 2003)), and 3) negotiate a settlement without
23
being restricted by any predetermined level of authority (Nick v. Morgan’s Foods, Inc.,
24
270 F.3d 590, 596 (8th Cir. 2001)).
25
Governmental entities may appear through litigation counsel only. As to all other
26
27
28
1
Statements under 20 pages in length, including attachments and exhibits, shall be e-mailed to chambers
at efile_Bartick@casd.uscourts.gov. Statements exceeding 20 pages in length, including attachments and
exhibits, must be delivered directly to chambers.
3
16-cv-2032-L (DHB)
1
parties, appearance by litigation counsel only is not acceptable. Retained outside corporate
2
counsel shall not appear on behalf of a corporation as the party who has the authority to
3
negotiate and enter into a settlement. The failure of any counsel, party or authorized
4
person to appear at the Mandatory Settlement Conference as required shall be cause
5
for the immediate imposition of sanctions. All conference discussions will be informal,
6
off the record, privileged, and confidential.
7
8
9
7.
Memoranda of Contentions of Fact and Law are neither expected nor
accepted.
8.
Counsel shall comply with the pre-trial disclosure requirements of Federal
10
Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(3) by April 23, 2018. Failure to comply with these
11
disclosure requirements could result in evidence preclusion or other sanctions under
12
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37.
13
9.
Counsel shall meet and take the action required by Local Rule 16.1(f)(4) by
14
April 30, 2018. At this meeting, counsel shall discuss and attempt to enter into stipulations
15
and agreements resulting in simplification of the triable issues. Counsel shall exchange
16
copies and/or display all exhibits other than those to be used for impeachment. The exhibits
17
shall be prepared in accordance with Local Rule 16.1(f)(4)(c). Counsel shall note any
18
objections they have to any other parties’ Pretrial Disclosures under Federal Rules of Civil
19
Procedure 26(a)(3). Counsel shall cooperate in the preparation of the proposed pretrial
20
conference order.
21
10.
Counsel for Plaintiff will be responsible for preparing the pretrial order and
22
arranging the meetings of counsel pursuant to Civil Local Rule 16.1(f). By May 7, 2018,
23
Plaintiff’s counsel must provide opposing counsel with the proposed pretrial order for
24
review and approval. Opposing counsel must communicate promptly with Plaintiff’s
25
attorney concerning any objections to form or content of the pretrial order, and both parties
26
shall attempt promptly to resolve their differences, if any, concerning the order.
27
28
11.
The Proposed Final Pretrial Conference Order, including objections to any
other parties’ Federal Rule 26(a)(3) Pretrial Disclosures shall be prepared, served and
4
16-cv-2032-L (DHB)
1
lodged with the assigned district judge by May 14, 2018, and shall be in the form prescribed
2
in and comply with Local Rule 16.1(f)(6).
3
12.
The final Pretrial Conference is scheduled on the calendar of the Honorable
4
M. James Lorenz on May 21, 2018 at 11:00 a.m. Note that trial briefs are not required
5
and leave to file a trial brief must be obtained from Judge Lorenz.
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13.
The parties must review the chambers’ rules for the assigned district judge
and magistrate judge.
14.
A post-trial settlement conference before a magistrate judge may be held
within 30 days of verdict in the case.
15.
The dates and times set forth herein will not be modified except for good cause
shown.
16.
Briefs or memoranda in support of or in opposition to any pending motion
13
shall not exceed twenty-five (25) pages in length without leave of a district court judge.
14
No reply memorandum shall exceed ten (10) pages without leave of a district court judge.
15
Briefs and memoranda exceeding ten (10) pages in length shall have a table of contents
16
and a table of authorities cited. Courtesy copies of filing exceeding 20 pages shall be
17
delivered to the Clerk of the Court and shall be noted as “Courtesy Copy.”
18
19
17.
Plaintiff’s counsel shall serve a copy of this order on all parties that enter this
case hereafter.
20
IT IS SO ORDERED.
21
Dated: September 12, 2017
_________________________
LOUISA S PORTER
United States Magistrate Judge
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
5
16-cv-2032-L (DHB)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?