Fulcher v. Hatton
Filing
12
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Court approves and adopts 11 Report and Recommendation in its entirety, grants Petitioner's 10 Motion for Voluntary Dismissal, and terminates as moot Respondent's 7 Motion to Dismiss. Clerk directed to close the file. Signed by Judge Cynthia Bashant on 2/17/2017. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (jah) (Main Document 12 replaced on 2/17/2017) (jah). Modified on 2/17/2017 - Wrong pdf attached. Corrected image and regenerated NEF (jah).
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
13
DONNELL D. FULCHER,
Case No. 16-cv-02041-BAS-BGS
Petitioner,
14
ORDER:
(1) APPROVING AND
ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION IN ITS
ENTIRETY (ECF No. 11);
15
v.
16
17
18
S. HATTON, Warden,
(2) GRANTING PETITIONER’S
MOTION FOR VOLUNTARY
DISMISSAL (ECF No. 10);
AND
Respondent.
19
(3) TERMINATING AS MOOT
RESPONDENT’S MOTION TO
DISMISS (ECF No. 7)
20
21
22
23
Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, submitted
24
a Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (ECF No. 1.)
25
Respondent moves to dismiss the Petition. (ECF No. 7.) Respondent argues the
26
Petition should be dismissed because Petitioner previously challenged the same
27
conviction in Fulcher v. R.H. Trimble, Case No. 11-cv-0959-CAB-WMC (S.D. Cal.
28
filed May 2, 2011). (Id.) In addition, Petitioner moves for voluntary dismissal of his
–1–
16cv2041
1
Petition. (ECF No. 10.) In his motion, Petitioner concedes that he lacks leave from
2
the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals to file this second and successive petition. (Id.)
3
Thus, Petitioner requests that the Court dismiss his Petition without prejudice. (Id.)
4
On January 31, 2017, U.S. Magistrate Judge Bernard G. Skomal issued a
5
Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) recommending that this Court grant
6
Petitioner’s motion for voluntary dismissal. (ECF No. 11.) The magistrate judge
7
reasoned that dismissal without prejudice is appropriate under Federal Rule of Civil
8
Procedure 41(a)(2). (Id.) No objections have been filed to the R&R.
9
The Court reviews de novo those portions of the R&R to which objections are
10
made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The Court may “accept, reject, or modify, in whole or
11
in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge.” Id. But
12
“[t]he statute makes it clear that the district judge must review the magistrate judge’s
13
findings and recommendations de novo if objection is made, but not otherwise.”
14
United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see
15
also Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F. Supp. 2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003) (concluding
16
that where no objections were filed, the district court had no obligation to review the
17
magistrate judge’s report). “Neither the Constitution nor the statute requires a district
18
judge to review, de novo, findings and recommendations that the parties themselves
19
accept as correct.” Id. “When no objections are filed, the de novo review is waived.”
20
Marshall v. Astrue, No. 08cv1735, 2010 WL 841252, at *1 (S.D. Cal. Mar. 10, 2010)
21
(Lorenz, J.) (adopting report in its entirety without review because neither party filed
22
objections to the report despite the opportunity to do so).
23
In this case, no objections have been filed, and neither party has requested
24
additional time to do so. Consequently, the Court may adopt the R&R on that basis
25
alone. See Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d at 1121. Having nonetheless conducted a de novo
26
of the R&R, the Court concludes that Judge Skomal’s reasoning is sound.
27
Accordingly, the Court hereby APPROVES and ADOPTS the R&R in its entirety
28
(ECF No. 11), GRANTS Petitioner’s motion for voluntary dismissal (ECF No. 10),
–2–
16cv2041
1
and TERMINATES AS MOOT Respondent’s motion to dismiss (ECF No. 7).
2
Accordingly, the Court DISMISSES WITHOUT PREJUDICE this action. The
3
Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case.
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
DATED: February 17, 2017
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
–3–
16cv2041
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?