Bondurant v. Booth

Filing 3

ORDER Denying 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and Dismissing Action Without Prejudice. Plaintiff is GRANTED forty-five (45) days from the date of this Order in which to re-open his case by either: (1) paying the entire $4 00 statutory and administrative filing fee, or (2) filing a new Motion to Proceed IFP. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to provide Plaintiff with a Court-approved form "Motion and Declaration in Support of Motion to Proceed IFP" in this matter. Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 9/12/16. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(IFP form sent to Plaintiff. dlg)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

TRAVIS BONDURANT,

Case No.: 3:16-cv-02254-GPC-JLB
Plaintiff,

12
13
14

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO
PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
AND DISMISSING ACTION
WITHOUT PREJUDICE

v.
NANCY BOOTH,
Defendants.

15
16
17
18
19

Travis Bondurant (“Plaintiff”), currently housed at the George F. Bailey Detention

20
21

Facility located in San Diego, California, and proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights

22

complaint (“Compl.”) pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Doc. No. 1). Plaintiff has not

23

prepaid the civil filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a); instead, he has filed a Motion

24

to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) (Doc. No. 2).

25

I.

26

Motion to Proceed IFP
All parties instituting any civil action, suit or proceeding in a district court of the

27

United States, except an application for writ of habeas corpus, must pay a filing fee of

28

$400. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). An action may proceed despite a plaintiff’s failure to
1
3:16-cv-02254-GPC-JLB

1

prepay the entire fee only if he is granted leave to proceed IFP pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

2

§ 1915(a). See Rodriguez v. Cook, 169 F.3d 1176, 1177 (9th Cir. 1999). However, if the

3

plaintiff is a prisoner at the time of filing, he may be granted leave to proceed IFP, but he

4

nevertheless remains obligated to pay the entire fee in “increments,” see Williams v.

5

Paramo, 775 F.3d 1182, 1185 (9th Cir. 2015), regardless of whether his action is

6

ultimately dismissed. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1) & (2); Taylor v. Delatoore, 281 F.3d

7

844, 847 (9th Cir. 2002). A “prisoner” is defined as “any person” who at the time of

8

filing is “incarcerated or detained in any facility who is accused of, convicted of,

9

sentenced for, or adjudicated delinquent for, violations of criminal law or the terms or

10

conditions of parole, probation, pretrial release, or diversionary program.” 28 U.S.C.

11

§ 1915(h); Taylor, 281 F.3d at 847.

12

In order to comply with the PLRA, prisoners seeking leave to proceed IFP must

13

also submit a “certified copy of the[ir] trust fund account statement (or institutional

14

equivalent) . . . for the 6-month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint.

15

. . .” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). From the certified trust account statement, the Court

16

assesses an initial payment of 20% of (a) the average monthly deposits in the account for

17

the past six months, or (b) the average monthly balance in the account for the past six

18

months, whichever is greater, unless the prisoner has no assets. See 28 U.S.C.

19

§ 1915(b)(1), (4); see Taylor, 281 F.3d at 850. Thereafter, the institution having custody

20

of the prisoner collects subsequent payments, assessed at 20% of the preceding month’s

21

income, in any month in which the prisoner’s account exceeds $10, and forwards them to

22

the Court until the entire filing fee is paid. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2).

23

While Plaintiff has filed a Motion to Proceed IFP pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a),

24

he has not attached a certified copy of his trust account statements, or an institutional

25

equivalent, for the 6-month period immediately preceding the filing of his Complaint. See

26

28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2); S.D. Cal. CivLR 3.2. Section 1915(a)(2) clearly requires that

27

prisoners “seeking to bring a civil action . . . without prepayment of fees . . . shall submit

28

a certified copy of the trust fund account statement (or institutional equivalent) . . . for the
2
3:16-cv-02254-GPC-JLB

1

6-month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint.” 28 U.S.C.

2

§ 1915(a)(2) (emphasis added).
Without Plaintiff’s trust account statement, the Court is simply unable to assess the

3
4

appropriate amount of the initial filing fee which is statutorily required to initiate the

5

prosecution of this action. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1).

6

II.

Conclusion and Order

7

For these reasons, IT IS ORDERED that:

8

(1)

9
10
11

Plaintiff’s Motion to Proceed IFP (ECF No. 2) is DENIED and the action is

DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to prepay the $400 filing fee required by 28
U.S.C. § 1914(a).
(2)

Plaintiff is GRANTED forty-five (45) days from the date of this Order in

12

which to re-open his case by either: (1) paying the entire $400 statutory and

13

administrative filing fee, or (2) filing a new Motion to Proceed IFP, which includes a

14

certified copy of his trust account statement for the 6-month period preceding the filing of

15

his Complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2) and S.D. Cal. CivLR 3.2(b).

16

(3)

The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to provide Plaintiff with a Court-

17

approved form “Motion and Declaration in Support of Motion to Proceed IFP” in this

18

matter. If Plaintiff neither pays the $400 filing fee in full nor sufficiently completes and

19

files the attached Motion to Proceed IFP, together with a certified copy of his trust

20

account statement within 45 days, this action will remained dismissed without prejudice

21

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a), and without further Order of the Court.

22
23

Dated: September 12, 2016

24
25
26
27
28
3
3:16-cv-02254-GPC-JLB