Auld v. Deel, M.D. et al

Filing 41

CLERK'S JUDGMENT. IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: The Court Grants Defendants' motion for summary judgment as to Dr. Deel, Dr. Luu, Dr. Canles, Dr.Nayyar, and Nurse Boucher on Plaintiff's Section 1983 claim for deliberate indifference. The Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff's professional negligence claim and, accordingly, dismisses that claim without prejudice. As Plaintiff has no remaining claims the Clerk is directed to close the case. It Is So Ordered. Signed by Judge Marilyn L. Huff on 2/7/2018. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jjg)

United States District Court
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Ronald Auld
Civil Action No.

16-cv-02276-H-NLS

Plaintiff,
V.
Margaret Deel, M.D.; Neha Nayyar,
M.D.; T. Luu, M.D.; Avelino Canles,
M.D.; Steve Boucher; Does 1-10,
Inclusive

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

Defendant.

Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The issues have been tried
or heard and a decision has been rendered.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:
The Court Grants Defendants’ motion for summary judgment as to Dr. Deel, Dr. Luu, Dr. Canles, Dr.
Nayyar, and Nurse Boucher on Plaintiff’s Section 1983 claim for deliberate indifference. The Court
declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff’s professional negligence claim and,
accordingly, dismisses that claim without prejudice. As Plaintiff has no remaining claims the Clerk is
directed to close the case. It Is So Ordered.

Date:

2/7/18

CLERK OF COURT
JOHN MORRILL, Clerk of Court
By: s/ J. Gutierrez
J. Gutierrez, Deputy