Loftis et al v. Ramos et al
Filing
117
CLERK'S JUDGMENT. IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Defendants did not violate Plaintiffs' Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable seizure.(rmc)
<![CDATA[
United States District Court
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Marissa Loftis; Marquise Deangelo
Loftis Jr.
Civil Action No. 16cv2300-MMA(MSB)
Plaintiff,
V.
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE
Denise Ramos, Sergeant; J. Ugalde; C.
Valadez (Meza); C Davis; Does 1-10
Defendant.
Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have been tried and the
jury has rendered its verdict.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:
that Defendants did not violate Plaintiffs' Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable
seizure.
Date:
10/15/19
CLERK OF COURT
JOHN MORRILL, Clerk of Court
By: s/ R. Chapman
R. Chapman, Deputy
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
