Riskas v. San Diego, County of et al

Filing 8

CLERK'S JUDGMENT. IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: Accordingly, the Court Dismisses this civil action in its entirety without prejudice based on Plaintiffs failure to state a claim upon which § 1983 relief can be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) and § 1915A(b)(1), and his failure to prosecute pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 41(b) in compliance with the Courts February 10, 2017 Order (ECF No. 5). The Court further Certifies that an IFP appeal would not be taken in good faith pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) and Directs the Clerk to enter a final judgment of dismissal and to close the file. IT IS SO ORDERED.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jjg)

United States District Court
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Douglas Lynn Riskas
Civil Action No. 16cv2317-CAB-BLM
Plaintiff,
V.

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

San Diego, County of; William D. Gore;
Does 1-50, Inclusive
Defendant.

Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The issues have been tried
or heard and a decision has been rendered.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:
Accordingly, the Court Dismisses this civil action in its entirety without prejudice
based on Plaintiff’s failure to state a claim upon which § 1983 relief can be granted pursuant
to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) and § 1915A(b)(1), and his failure to prosecute pursuant
to FED. R. CIV. P. 41(b) in compliance with the Court’s February 10, 2017 Order (ECF No.
5). The Court further Certifies that an IFP appeal would not be taken in good faith
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) and Directs the Clerk to enter a final judgment of
dismissal and to close the file. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date:

6/12/17

CLERK OF COURT
JOHN MORRILL, Clerk of Court
By: s/ J. Gutierrez
J. Gutierrez, Deputy