Holmes v. Estock et al

Filing 103

ORDER Sua Sponte Granting Extension of Time to File Reply Brief; Vacating Motion Hearing. Defendants may file their reply brief on or before November 13, 2019. Upon completion of the briefing, the Court will take the matter under submission on the br iefs, without oral argument, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1.d.1. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b). Accordingly, no appearances will be required, and the hearing previously scheduled for November 18, 2019 is vacated. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 11/5/2019. (tcf)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8
9

CHARLES HOLMES,

Case No. 16cv2458-MMA (BLM)
Plaintiff,

10
11

v.

12

ORDER SUA SPONTE GRANTING
EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE
REPLY BRIEF;

ESTOCK, et al.,
Defendants.

13

VACATING MOTION HEARING

14
15
16

On November 4, 2019, the Court granted Plaintiff a second extension of time in

17

which to file his response in opposition to Defendants’ pending motion for summary

18

judgment. See Doc. No. 102. Upon due consideration, good cause appearing, the Court

19

GRANTS Defendants an extension of time in which to file a reply brief in support of

20

their pending motion. Accordingly, Defendants may file their reply brief on or before

21

November 13, 2019. Upon completion of the briefing, the Court will take the matter

22

under submission on the briefs, without oral argument, pursuant to Civil Local Rule

23

7.1.d.1. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b). Accordingly, no appearances will be required, and the

24

hearing previously scheduled for November 18, 2019 is VACATED.

25
26
27

IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATE: November 5, 2019

_______________________________________
HON. MICHAEL M. ANELLO
United States District Judge

28
1
16cv2458-MMA (BLM)