Holmes v. Estock et al
Filing
151
ORDER Following Mandatory Settlement Conference; Requiring Counsel to Meet and Confer Re: Pretrial Schedule. The Court hereby ORDERS counsel for the parties to meet and confer and file within the next fourteen (14) business days a joint status report that sets forth a proposed pretrial schedule, taking into account the scheduling restriction set forth in OCJ No. 62, the trial-related procedures set forth in the undersigned's Civil Chambers Rules IX and X, and any scheduling issues that may be germane to this action in light of Holmes' current health status, place of confinement, and so forth. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 4/14/2021. (tcf)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
CHARLES HOLMES,
Case No. 16cv2458-MMA-BLM
Plaintiff,
12
13
v.
14
ORDER FOLLOWING
MANDATORY SETTLEMENT
CONFERENCE;
ESTOCK, et al.,
Defendants.
15
REQUIRING COUNSEL TO MEET
AND CONFER RE: PRETRIAL
SCHEDULE
16
17
18
19
Plaintiff Charles Holmes, a California inmate proceeding through counsel, brings
20
this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging violations of his Eighth
21
Amendment right to adequate medical care. On February 16, 2021, the Court denied
22
Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. See Doc. No. 145. In light of the ongoing
23
global pandemic and pursuant to the Order of the Chief Judge in effect at the time, see
24
OCJ No. 60, the Court deferred issuing a pretrial scheduling order and ordered counsel
25
for the parties to jointly contact the chambers of the assigned magistrate judge for the
26
purpose of scheduling a settlement conference. See Doc. No. 145 at 53. The assigned
27
magistrate judge held a mandatory settlement conference on April 13, 2021; the case did
28
not settle. See Doc. No. 150.
1
16cv2458-MMA-BLM
1
Holmes’ claims must be tried to a jury. However, pursuant to Order of the Chief
2
Judge No. 62, civil jury trials in this district will not resume until on or after June 1, 2021.
3
Accordingly, the Court hereby ORDERS counsel for the parties to meet and confer and
4
file within the next fourteen (14) business days a joint status report that sets forth a
5
proposed pretrial schedule, taking into account the scheduling restriction set forth in OCJ
6
No. 62, the trial-related procedures set forth in the undersigned’s Civil Chambers Rules
7
IX and X, and any scheduling issues that may be germane to this action in light of
8
Holmes’ current health status, place of confinement, and so forth.
9
10
11
12
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATE: April 14, 2021
_______________________________________
HON. MICHAEL M. ANELLO
United States District Judge
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
16cv2458-MMA-BLM
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?