Holmes v. Estock et al

Filing 151

ORDER Following Mandatory Settlement Conference; Requiring Counsel to Meet and Confer Re: Pretrial Schedule. The Court hereby ORDERS counsel for the parties to meet and confer and file within the next fourteen (14) business days a joint status report that sets forth a proposed pretrial schedule, taking into account the scheduling restriction set forth in OCJ No. 62, the trial-related procedures set forth in the undersigned's Civil Chambers Rules IX and X, and any scheduling issues that may be germane to this action in light of Holmes' current health status, place of confinement, and so forth. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 4/14/2021. (tcf)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CHARLES HOLMES, Case No. 16cv2458-MMA-BLM Plaintiff, 12 13 v. 14 ORDER FOLLOWING MANDATORY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE; ESTOCK, et al., Defendants. 15 REQUIRING COUNSEL TO MEET AND CONFER RE: PRETRIAL SCHEDULE 16 17 18 19 Plaintiff Charles Holmes, a California inmate proceeding through counsel, brings 20 this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging violations of his Eighth 21 Amendment right to adequate medical care. On February 16, 2021, the Court denied 22 Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. See Doc. No. 145. In light of the ongoing 23 global pandemic and pursuant to the Order of the Chief Judge in effect at the time, see 24 OCJ No. 60, the Court deferred issuing a pretrial scheduling order and ordered counsel 25 for the parties to jointly contact the chambers of the assigned magistrate judge for the 26 purpose of scheduling a settlement conference. See Doc. No. 145 at 53. The assigned 27 magistrate judge held a mandatory settlement conference on April 13, 2021; the case did 28 not settle. See Doc. No. 150. 1 16cv2458-MMA-BLM 1 Holmes’ claims must be tried to a jury. However, pursuant to Order of the Chief 2 Judge No. 62, civil jury trials in this district will not resume until on or after June 1, 2021. 3 Accordingly, the Court hereby ORDERS counsel for the parties to meet and confer and 4 file within the next fourteen (14) business days a joint status report that sets forth a 5 proposed pretrial schedule, taking into account the scheduling restriction set forth in OCJ 6 No. 62, the trial-related procedures set forth in the undersigned’s Civil Chambers Rules 7 IX and X, and any scheduling issues that may be germane to this action in light of 8 Holmes’ current health status, place of confinement, and so forth. 9 10 11 12 IT IS SO ORDERED. DATE: April 14, 2021 _______________________________________ HON. MICHAEL M. ANELLO United States District Judge 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 16cv2458-MMA-BLM

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?