White v. Johnson
Filing
30
ORDER Granting Motion to Continue Stay; and Directions to Parties Regarding the Court's Expectations. Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 7/7/2017.(lrf)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MATT STRONG,
12
CASE NOS. 16cv1289-LAB (JMA) and
16cv2524-LAB (JMA)
Plaintiff,
vs.
13
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
CONTINUE STAY; AND
14
15
DIANA E. JOHNSON, TRUSTEE OF
THE DIANA E. JOHNSON TRUST
DATED JULY 25, 2013,
DIRECTIONS TO PARTIES
REGARDING THE COURT’S
EXPECTATIONS
16
17
Defendant.
________________________________
18
DOROTHY WHITE,
Plaintiff,
19
vs.
20
21
22
DIANE E. JOHNSON, TRUSTEE OF
THE DIANE E. JOHNSON TRUST
DATED JULY 25, 2013,
Defendant.
23
24
25
The Court stayed these consolidated actions and ordered the parties to jointly file a
26
status report by July 7. The report was to have shown whether conditions in the Miss Donuts
27
parking lot at 9729 Camp Road in Spring Valley were now ADA-compliant.
28
///
-1-
16cv1289/16CV2524
1
The parties instead each filed their own status report. Defendant hired a contractor
2
to resurface the parking space and to remediate ADA violations. It appears Plaintiff’s
3
counsel then visited the facility and looked at the parking lot. Plaintiff now agrees the
4
signage complies with the ADA. But the parties disagree about whether the slope of the
5
parking space is ADA-compliant.
6
According to both reports, an attorney from Plaintiff’s firm who admittedly is a non-
7
expert measured the slope using only a 24-inch digital level. Plaintiff’s report suggests this
8
is the method recommended by the government. That is not accurate; the government
9
recommends several methods, which include hiring a surveyor or using a digital slope meter
10
or other sophisticated electronic instrument.
A less-accurate option involves using a
11
carpenter’s level. But this method requires use of a tape measure and bracing the level with
12
an object such as a pencil.1 Defendant says its contractor’s work is still under warranty,
13
implying that Defendant stands ready to make any further changes that are needed, as long
14
as Plaintiff is prepared to show the contractor what is wrong.
15
The Court’s orders contemplated that the parties would rely on measurements or
16
observations by someone with expertise in determining ADA compliance. See Rush v.
17
Islands Restaurants, LP, 2012 WL 4849016, at *2 and n.1 (S.D. Cal., Oct. 11, 2012)
18
(observing that it was much more appropriate for a disability claimant to hire someone with
19
training in surveying, architecture, construction, or some allied field rather than having an
20
attorney measure parking lot slope using a carpenter’s level).
21
The Court also expects Plaintiff’s counsel to send someone to inspect and measure
22
the parking lot who has experience and training in such matters. If the parking lot is still out
23
of compliance, that person should be able to demonstrate to Defendant’s contractor what
24
is wrong, so that Defendant can get the work redone. Or if it is now ADA-compliant, the
25
person Plaintiff designates should confirm that so that this case can continue towards
26
27
28
1
See
https://www.access-board.gov/research/completed-research/
dimensional-tolerances/part-iii-appendices (“Carpenter's levels are used for setting level and
plumb only. To determine angles the level must be used with a measuring tape to determine
slope.”).
-2-
16cv1289/16CV2524
1
resolution. The parties are directed to work together, to avoid the need for any further
2
extensions or parallel filings.
3
The joint motion is GRANTED in part. No later than 14 calendar days from the date
4
this order is issued, Plaintiff shall designate someone with appropriate training in
5
determining a parking lot’s compliance with the ADA, who shall promptly meet and confer
6
with Defendant’s contractor. No later than 30 days from the date this order is issued, the
7
parties shall submit a joint status report giving the current status of the parking lot, as
8
previously ordered.
9
10
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: July 7, 2017
11
12
HONORABLE LARRY ALAN BURNS
United States District Judge
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3-
16cv1289/16CV2524
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?