The Whitewater Draw Natural Resource Conservation District et al v. Johnson et al

Filing 48

ORDER Denying as moot 39 Motion to Dismiss The Complaint. Signed by Judge M. James Lorenz on 1/22/2018. (jao) Modified to correct link on 1/22/2018 (jao).

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10
11

THE WHITEWATER DRAW
NATURAL RESOURCE
CONSERVATION DISTRICT et al.,

12
13
14

Case No.: 16cv2583-L(BLM)
ORDER DENYING AS MOOT
MOTION TO DISMISS THE
COMPLAINT

Plaintiffs,
v.
KRISTJEN NIELSEN, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
17

In light of Plaintiffs' filing of the amended complaint, the Federal Defendants'

18

Motion to Dismiss the Complaint in Part for Lack of Jurisdiction and Failure to State a

19

Claim (doc. no. 39) is denied as moot. See Valdez-Lopez v. Chertoff, 656 F.3d 851, 857

20

(9th Cir. 2011) ("it is well-established that an amended complaint supersedes the original,

21

the latter being treated thereafter as non-existent" (internal quotation marks and citations

22

omitted)); see also Ramirez v. County of San Bernardino, 806 F.3d 1002, 1008 (9th Cir.

23

2015).)

24
25

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 22, 2018

26
27
28
1
16cv2583-L(BLM)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
16cv2583-L(BLM)