Cataldo v. Madox et al

Filing 56

CLERK'S JUDGMENT. IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that judgment is the Court: Reinstates its June 7, 2018 Order Granting Defendant County of San Diego's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6); and Dismisses the remainder of this civil action in its entirety based on Plaintiffs failure to prosecute pursuant to Fed. R.Civ. P. 41(b).(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(mme)

United States District Court
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
David J Cataldo, CDCR #T-79908
Civil Action No. 16-cv-02747-JAH-WVG
Plaintiff,
V.

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

See attachment

Defendant.

Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The issues have been tried
or heard and a decision has been rendered.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:
Reinstates its June 7, 2018 Order Granting Defendant County of San Diego’s Motion to Dismiss
Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6); and Dismisses the
remainder of this civil action in its entirety based onPlaintiff’s failure to prosecute pursuant to Fed. R.
Civ. P. 41(b).

Date:

2/12/20

CLERK OF COURT
JOHN MORRILL, Clerk of Court
By: s/ M. Exler
M. Exler, Deputy

United States District Court
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

(ATTACHMENT)
Civil Action No. 16-cv-02747-JAH-WVG
SHERIFF DEPUTY MADOX, Vista Detention Facility; JOHN DOES, GBDF Medical Staff; Dr. QUOC
TRAN; COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO,
Defendants