Vazquez v. Kraft Heinz Foods Company et al

Filing 45

ORDER Granting Joint Motion for Protective Order With Modification (ECF No. 44 ). Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara Lynn Major on 11/16/2017. (ajs)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12
13

16
17

ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION
FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER WITH
MODIFICATION

Plaintiffs,

14
15

Case No.: 16cv2749-WQH (BLM)

ENRIQUE VAZQUEZ, SERGIO ALFONZO
LOPEZ, and MARIA VIVEROS, individually
and on behalf of themselves and others
similarly situated,

v.

[ECF No. 44]

KRAFT HEINZ FOODS COMPANY, et al.,
Defendants.

18

On November 16, 2017, the parties filed a joint motion requesting that the Court enter

19

the parties’ Protective Order. ECF No. 44. The Court has considered the Stipulated Protective

20

Order and, for good cause shown, the joint motion is GRANTED with the following modification:

21

Paragraph 12.3 should read: Filing Protected Material. Without written permission from

22

the Designating Party or a court order secured after appropriate notice to all interested persons,

23

a Party may not file in the public record in this action any Protected Material. A Party that seeks

24

to file under seal any Protected Material must comply with the procedures explained in Section

25

2.j of the Electronic Case Filing Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual for the United

26

States District Court for the Southern District of California and Civil Local Rule 79.2. Protected

27

Material may only be filed under seal pursuant to a court order authorizing the sealing of the

28

specific Protected Material at issue. A sealing order will issue only upon a request establishing
1

16cv2749-WQH (BLM)

1

that the Protected Material at issue is privileged, protectable as a trade secret, or otherwise

2

entitled to protection under the law. The request must be narrowly tailored to seek sealing only

3

of the confidential or privileged material. In addition, in accordance with Judge Major’s

4

preferences, a party must file a ‘public’ version of any document that it seeks to file

5

under seal. In the public version, the party may redact only that information that is

6

deemed

7

simultaneously with a joint motion or ex parte application requesting that the

8

confidential portions of the document(s) be filed under seal and setting forth good

9

cause for the request. If a Receiving Party's request to file Protected Material under seal is

10

denied by the court, then the Receiving Party may file the information in the public record unless

11

otherwise instructed by the court.

12

‘Confidential.’

The

party

should

file

the

redacted

document(s)

IT IS SO ORDERED.

13
14

Dated: 11/16/2017

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2

16cv2749-WQH (BLM)