Vazquez v. Kraft Heinz Foods Company et al

Filing 45

ORDER Granting Joint Motion for Protective Order With Modification (ECF No. 44 ). Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara Lynn Major on 11/16/2017. (ajs)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 16 17 ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER WITH MODIFICATION Plaintiffs, 14 15 Case No.: 16cv2749-WQH (BLM) ENRIQUE VAZQUEZ, SERGIO ALFONZO LOPEZ, and MARIA VIVEROS, individually and on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, v. [ECF No. 44] KRAFT HEINZ FOODS COMPANY, et al., Defendants. 18 On November 16, 2017, the parties filed a joint motion requesting that the Court enter 19 the parties’ Protective Order. ECF No. 44. The Court has considered the Stipulated Protective 20 Order and, for good cause shown, the joint motion is GRANTED with the following modification: 21 Paragraph 12.3 should read: Filing Protected Material. Without written permission from 22 the Designating Party or a court order secured after appropriate notice to all interested persons, 23 a Party may not file in the public record in this action any Protected Material. A Party that seeks 24 to file under seal any Protected Material must comply with the procedures explained in Section 25 2.j of the Electronic Case Filing Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual for the United 26 States District Court for the Southern District of California and Civil Local Rule 79.2. Protected 27 Material may only be filed under seal pursuant to a court order authorizing the sealing of the 28 specific Protected Material at issue. A sealing order will issue only upon a request establishing 1 16cv2749-WQH (BLM) 1 that the Protected Material at issue is privileged, protectable as a trade secret, or otherwise 2 entitled to protection under the law. The request must be narrowly tailored to seek sealing only 3 of the confidential or privileged material. In addition, in accordance with Judge Major’s 4 preferences, a party must file a ‘public’ version of any document that it seeks to file 5 under seal. In the public version, the party may redact only that information that is 6 deemed 7 simultaneously with a joint motion or ex parte application requesting that the 8 confidential portions of the document(s) be filed under seal and setting forth good 9 cause for the request. If a Receiving Party's request to file Protected Material under seal is 10 denied by the court, then the Receiving Party may file the information in the public record unless 11 otherwise instructed by the court. 12 ‘Confidential.’ The party should file the redacted document(s) IT IS SO ORDERED. 13 14 Dated: 11/16/2017 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 16cv2749-WQH (BLM)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?