Vazquez v. Kraft Heinz Foods Company et al
Filing
45
ORDER Granting Joint Motion for Protective Order With Modification (ECF No. 44 ). Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara Lynn Major on 11/16/2017. (ajs)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
16
17
ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION
FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER WITH
MODIFICATION
Plaintiffs,
14
15
Case No.: 16cv2749-WQH (BLM)
ENRIQUE VAZQUEZ, SERGIO ALFONZO
LOPEZ, and MARIA VIVEROS, individually
and on behalf of themselves and others
similarly situated,
v.
[ECF No. 44]
KRAFT HEINZ FOODS COMPANY, et al.,
Defendants.
18
On November 16, 2017, the parties filed a joint motion requesting that the Court enter
19
the parties’ Protective Order. ECF No. 44. The Court has considered the Stipulated Protective
20
Order and, for good cause shown, the joint motion is GRANTED with the following modification:
21
Paragraph 12.3 should read: Filing Protected Material. Without written permission from
22
the Designating Party or a court order secured after appropriate notice to all interested persons,
23
a Party may not file in the public record in this action any Protected Material. A Party that seeks
24
to file under seal any Protected Material must comply with the procedures explained in Section
25
2.j of the Electronic Case Filing Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual for the United
26
States District Court for the Southern District of California and Civil Local Rule 79.2. Protected
27
Material may only be filed under seal pursuant to a court order authorizing the sealing of the
28
specific Protected Material at issue. A sealing order will issue only upon a request establishing
1
16cv2749-WQH (BLM)
1
that the Protected Material at issue is privileged, protectable as a trade secret, or otherwise
2
entitled to protection under the law. The request must be narrowly tailored to seek sealing only
3
of the confidential or privileged material. In addition, in accordance with Judge Major’s
4
preferences, a party must file a ‘public’ version of any document that it seeks to file
5
under seal. In the public version, the party may redact only that information that is
6
deemed
7
simultaneously with a joint motion or ex parte application requesting that the
8
confidential portions of the document(s) be filed under seal and setting forth good
9
cause for the request. If a Receiving Party's request to file Protected Material under seal is
10
denied by the court, then the Receiving Party may file the information in the public record unless
11
otherwise instructed by the court.
12
‘Confidential.’
The
party
should
file
the
redacted
document(s)
IT IS SO ORDERED.
13
14
Dated: 11/16/2017
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
16cv2749-WQH (BLM)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?