Nible v. Fink et al
Filing 50
ORDER denying Plaintiff 35 Motion for Declaratory Judgment and denying 37 Motion for Hearing Date. In the context of this lawsuit with the record not yet fully developed, Plaintiff's Motion is more appropriately construed as a request for an advisory opinion pursuant to Article II of the United States Constitution, Plaintiff's Motion for Declaratory Judgment is denied. Court finds that oral argument is unnecessary to decide Plaintiff's Motion for Declaratory Judgment and exe rcises its discretion to decide the Motion solely on the pleadings, Plaintiff's Motion for Hearing id denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge Ruth Bermudez Montenegro on 11/2/2018. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (jah)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
