Warren v. Wells Fargo & Company et al

Filing 76

CLERK'S JUDGMENT. IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: Wells Fargo's motion to dismiss is Granted in its entirety, and the second amended complaint is Dismissed With Prejudice. It Is So Ordered. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jjg)

United States District Court
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mark Warren
Civil Action No. 16-cv-02872-CAB-NLS
Plaintiff,
V.
Wells Fargo & Company; Wells Fargo Bank,
N.A.; All Persons Unknown Claiming Any
Legal or Equitable Right, Title/Estate, Lien or
Interest in the Property Described in the
Complaint Adverse to Plaintiff's Title or any
Cloud on Plaintiff's; Does 1 through 99,
Defendant.
inclusive; Clear Recon Corp.

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The issues have been tried
or heard and a decision has been rendered.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:
Wells Fargo’s motion to dismiss is Granted in its entirety, and the second amended complaint is
Dismissed With Prejudice. It Is So Ordered.

Date:

1/3/18

CLERK OF COURT
JOHN MORRILL, Clerk of Court
By: s/ J. Gutierrez
J. Gutierrez, Deputy