Warren v. Wells Fargo & Company et al
Filing
76
CLERK'S JUDGMENT. IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: Wells Fargo's motion to dismiss is Granted in its entirety, and the second amended complaint is Dismissed With Prejudice. It Is So Ordered. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jjg)
United States District Court
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mark Warren
Civil Action No. 16-cv-02872-CAB-NLS
Plaintiff,
V.
Wells Fargo & Company; Wells Fargo Bank,
N.A.; All Persons Unknown Claiming Any
Legal or Equitable Right, Title/Estate, Lien or
Interest in the Property Described in the
Complaint Adverse to Plaintiff's Title or any
Cloud on Plaintiff's; Does 1 through 99,
Defendant.
inclusive; Clear Recon Corp.
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE
Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The issues have been tried
or heard and a decision has been rendered.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:
Wells Fargo’s motion to dismiss is Granted in its entirety, and the second amended complaint is
Dismissed With Prejudice. It Is So Ordered.
Date:
1/3/18
CLERK OF COURT
JOHN MORRILL, Clerk of Court
By: s/ J. Gutierrez
J. Gutierrez, Deputy
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?