Carbonell v. San Diego, County of et al

Filing 15

ORDER granting 14 Second Joint Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re 10 First Amended Complaint. Defendants OptumHealth, Le Ann Skimming, TERM, and Rada West shall answer by 6/14/2017. Signed by Judge Cynthia Bashant on 5/9/2017. (jah)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SONIA INES CARBONELL, 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 v. 14 15 Case No. 17-cv-00064-BAS-BLM ORDER GRANTING SECOND JOINT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO; TERM aka TREATMENT and EVALUATION RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; OPTUM HEALTH aka OPTUM; DR. SARA MALTZMAN; DR. RADA WEST; DR. LEANN SKIMMING, and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, 16 17 18 19 Defendants. 20 21 22 23 Before the Court is Plaintiff Carbonell and the Optum Defendants’ motion to 24 extend Defendants’ time to respond to Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint.1 (ECF 25 No. 14.) Plaintiff and the Optum Defendants explain that Plaintiff and Defendant 26 County of San Diego are currently at trial in San Diego Superior Court, and that jury 27 28 1 Defendants County of San Diego and Sara Maltzman are not parties to this motion. –1– 17cv64 1 selection in that trial concluded on May 3, 2017. (Id. ¶ 4.) 2 Having reviewed the motion, and good cause appearing, the Court GRANTS 3 the motion. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b). Accordingly, Defendants shall file their 4 responsive pleadings no later than June 14, 2017. 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: May 9, 2017 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 –2– 17cv64

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?