Carbonell v. San Diego, County of et al
Filing
53
CLERK'S JUDGMENT. IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: Plaintiff has had three opportunities to state claims for violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1981, 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, without success. Accordingly, the motions are Granted and the SAC Is Dismissed With Prejudice. The Clerk of the Court shall Close this case. It Is So Ordered.(jjg)
United States District Court
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sonia Ines Carbonell
Plaintiff,
Civil Action No. 17-cv-00064-CAB-BLM
V.
San Diego, County of; TERM aka
Treatment and Evaluation Resource
Management; OptumHealth aka Optum;
Dr. Sara Maltzman; Dr. Rada West,
OptumHealth TERM Psychologist; Dr. Le
Ann Skimming, TERM Clinical Manager;
Does 1 through 50, inclusive
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE
Defendant.
Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The issues have been tried
or heard and a decision has been rendered.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:
Plaintiff has had three opportunities to state claims for violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1981, 42 U.S.C. § 1983
and Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, without success. Accordingly, the motions are Granted
and the SAC Is Dismissed With Prejudice. The Clerk of the Court shall Close this case. It Is So
Ordered.
Date:
2/16/18
CLERK OF COURT
JOHN MORRILL, Clerk of Court
By: s/ J. Gutierrez
J. Gutierrez, Deputy
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?