Apple Inc. v. Qualcomm Incorporated

Filing 1172

ORDER Granting in Part and Denying in Part Motions to Seal (ECF Nos. 1101 1113 1073 1076 1116 1090 1110 1087 1085 1099 1095 1102 1118 1091 1083 1105 1093 ). Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 4/15/19. (dlg)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12
13

Case No.: 3:17-cv-0108-GPC-mdd
IN RE:

ORDER GRANTING IN PART
AND DENYING IN PART
MOTIONS TO SEAL

QUALCOMM LITIGATION

14
15

[ECF Nos. 1101, 1113, 1073, 1076,
1116, 1090, 1110, 1087, 1085, 1099,
1095, 1102, 1118, 1091, 1083, 1105,
1093.]

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Before the Court are numerous non-party requests to seal certain exhibits whose
documents are among the “will call” exhibits and deposition designations that the parties
may offer into evidence in Case No. 3:17-cv-00108-GPC-MDD. (ECF Nos. 1101, 1113,
1073, 1076, 1116, 1090, 1110, 1087, 1085, 1099, 1095, 1102, 1118, 1091, 1083, 1105,
1093.) Qualcomm Incorporated (“Qualcomm”) has filed a consolidated response to the
motions to seal. ECF No. 1138. Apple Inc. (“Apple”) and Compal Electronics, Inc., Hon
Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd., FIH Mobile Ltd., Pegatron Corporation, and Wistron
Corporation (collectively, the “Contract Manufacturers” or “CMs”) have submitted that
1
3:17-cv-0108-GPC-mdd

1

they do not oppose any sealing motions filed by any non-parties in this action. (ECF No.

2

1136.) Upon review of the moving papers, the Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in

3

part the motions.

4

LEGAL STANDARD

5

There is a presumptive right of public access to court records based upon the

6

common law and the first amendment. See Nixon v. Warner Commc’ns, Inc., 435 U.S.

7

589, 597 (1978); Phillips ex rel. Estates of Byrd v. General Motors Corp., 307 F.3d 1206,

8

1212-13 (9th Cir. 2002). Nonetheless, access may be denied to protect sensitive

9

confidential information. Courts are more likely to protect information covered by Rule

10

26(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, but are not limited by items listed in

11

protective orders. See KL Group v. Case, Kay, & Lynch, 829 F.2d 909, 917-19 (9th Cir.

12

1987) (letter to client from attorney); Kalinauskas v. Wong, 151 F.R.D. 363, 365-67

13

(D. Nev. 1993) (confidential settlement agreement).

14

“Unless a particular court record is one traditionally kept secret, a strong

15

presumption in favor of access is the starting point.” Kamakana v. City & Cty. of

16

Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178-80 (9th Cir. 2006) (citing Foltz v. State Farm Mut. Auto.

17

Ins. Co., 331 F.3d 1122, 1135 (9th Cir. 2003)). “In order to overcome this strong

18

presumption, a party seeking to seal a judicial record must articulate justifications for

19

sealing that outweigh the historical right of access and the public policies favoring

20

disclosure.” Id. at 1178-79.

21

The presumption of access is “based on the need for federal courts, although

22

independent—indeed, particularly because they are independent—to have a measure of

23

accountability and for the public to have confidence in the administration of justice.”

24

United States v. Amodeo (Amodeo II ), 71 F.3d 1044, 1048 (2d Cir.1995); see also Valley

25

Broad. Co. v. U.S. Dist. Court—D. Nev., 798 F.2d 1289, 1294 (9th Cir.1986) (explaining

26
27
28

2
3:17-cv-0108-GPC-mdd

1

that the presumption of public access “promot[es] the public's understanding of the

2

judicial process and of significant public events”).

3

Accordingly, “[a] party seeking to seal a judicial record then bears the burden of

4

overcoming this strong presumption by meeting the ‘compelling reasons' standard.”

5

Kamakana, 447 F.3d at 1178. Under this stringent standard, a court may seal records only

6

when it finds “a compelling reason and articulate[s] the factual basis for its ruling,

7

without relying on hypothesis or conjecture.” Id. at 1179. The court must then

8

“conscientiously balance[ ] the competing interests of the public and the party who seeks

9

to keep certain judicial records secret.” Id. (quoting Foltz, 331 F.3d at 1135) (alteration in

10

original) (internal quotation marks omitted). What constitutes a “compelling reason” is

11

“best left to the sound discretion of the trial court.” Nixon, 435 U.S. at 599.

12

Previously, some courts applied a “compelling reason” or “good cause” standard

13

for sealing depending on whether the pending motion was dispositive or non-dispositive.

14

E.g., Kamakana, 447 F.3d at 1180 (9th Cir. 2006) (parties seeking to seal documents in a

15

dispositive motion must provide “compelling reasons” to support a sealing whereas for

16

non-dispositive motions the parties must show a lesser “particularized showing” under

17

the “good cause” standard pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c)); Phillips ex

18

rel. Estates of Byrd v. Gen. Motors Corp., 307 F.3d 1206, 1213 (9th Cir. 2002) (when a

19

party attaches a sealed discovery document to a nondispositive motion, the usual

20

presumption of the public's right of access is rebutted).

21

Other courts rejected this binary approach. In re Midland National Life Insurance

22

Company Annuity Sales Practices Litigation, 686 F.3d 1115 (9th Cir.2012), is one such

23

case that rejected the literal dispositive/nondispositive label. In that case, an intervenor

24

moved to unseal documents attached to a Daubert motion. Id. at 1118. The district court,

25

like the district court here, concluded that the documents should remain under seal

26

because “the Daubert motion was non-dispositive,” as it “would not have been a

27
28

3
3:17-cv-0108-GPC-mdd

1

determination on the merits of any claim or defense.” Id. at 1119. The Ninth Circuit

2

rejected the district court's focus on whether the motion was literally “dispositive”: “That

3

the records are connected to a Daubert motion does not, on its own, conclusively resolve

4

the issue.” Id. As the motion, in effect, “pertain[ed] to central issues bearing on

5

defendant's summary judgment motion,” we treated that motion as dispositive. Id.

6

Similarly, the court in Ctr. for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Grp., LLC, 809 F.3d 1092, 1100

7

(9th Cir. 2016) observed that it would not allow the technically nondispositive nature of a

8

Daubert motion to cloud the reality that it was able to significantly affect the disposition

9

of the issues in the case.

10

Here, the motions to seal relate to numerous potential trial exhibits and deposition

11

designations that the parties may intend to call into evidence at trial. This Court will

12

apply the “compelling reasons” standard to these motions and related briefing as those

13

submissions pertain to central issues at trial and are “more than tangentially related to the

14

underlying cause of action.” Ctrs. for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Grp., 809 F.3d 1092, 1099

15

(9th Cir. 2016).

16

Compelling reasons for sealing information exist “when such ‘court files might

17

have become a vehicle for improper purposes,’ such as the use of records to gratify

18

private spite, promote public scandal, circulate libelous statements, or release trade

19

secrets.” Kamakana, 447 F.3d at 1179 (quoting Nixon, 435 U.S. at 598). Trade secrets

20

“may consist of any formula, pattern, device or compilation of information which is used

21

in one’s business, and which gives him an opportunity to obtain advantage over

22

competitions who do not know or use it.” Restatement (First) of Torts § 757 cmt. b.

23

Because trade secrets concern proprietary and sensitive business information not

24

available to the public, sealing may be warranted where disclosure would harm a

25

litigant’s competitive standing. Nixon, 425 U.S. at 598.

26
27
28

4
3:17-cv-0108-GPC-mdd

1

The Ninth Circuit has explicitly recognized that compelling reasons exist for the

2

sealing of “pricing terms, royalty rates, and guaranteed minimum payment terms” of

3

license agreements. See In re Elec. Arts, Inc., 298 F. App’x 568, 569 (9th Cir. 2008).

4

Courts in this circuit have also recognized that information subject to confidentiality

5

agreements may also meet the “compelling reasons” standard when accompanied by a

6

particularized factual showing. See Foltz, 331 F.3d at 1137-38.

7

DISCUSSION

8

The Court now turns to the substance of the instant sealing motions. The majority

9

of information that the movants seek to seal constitutes confidential business information

10

of the parties, including trade secrets, proprietary business records, discussions of internal

11

strategy, company dealings, and materials designated as “Highly Confidential.” To the

12

extent that the proposed redactions are narrowly tailored and relate to the rationale above,

13

the Court agrees that the movants have demonstrated that compelling reasons exist for

14

sealing the information subsumed by these categories. Analysis from this Court’s prior

15

orders granting the movants’ motions to seal is applicable here. (See ECF Nos. 1143 and

16

1155.)

17

However, the Court also finds that some of the information that the movants seek

18

to seal is stale, overbroad, or relate to key issues in the case. Even where the parties seek

19

to cover information that may properly be sealed, they should seek to seal only the

20

narrowly sealable information and not whole paragraphs, documents, sections, or

21

presentations that do not justify extensive redaction. In some documents, the information

22

at issue is too general to warrant sealing. Other suggested redactions would

23

inappropriately shield stale information that is too old to be presently confidential. And

24

yet other redacted exhibits in their current states would close from the public exhibits that

25

relate to issues at the heart of this case, including a variety of SULAs, testimony about

26

Qualcomm’s rates and Qualcomm’s leverage. In light of the public’s right to access, this

27
28

5
3:17-cv-0108-GPC-mdd

1

Court finds no colorable justification to seal those exhibits in their presently proposed

2

form. Repeated requests to close and clear the courtroom would be unduly cumbersome

3

to the Court’s interest in managing the trial. Sealing such information would hamstring

4

the parties and stymie them from litigating key issues effectively and efficiently.

5

Furthermore, over-sealing crucial exhibits would impede the jury and the public’s ability

6

to understand the nature of the proceedings and the factual basis for the parties’ claims.

7

As such, the Court finds that the movants have not articulated “compelling

8

reasons” to keep all the requested information from the public. Accordingly, the sealing

9

motions at ECF Nos. 1076, 1083, 1091, 1101, 1113, 1073, 1095, 1099, 1118, 1105 filed

10

by Asustek, AT&T, Ericsson, Kyocera, LGE, HTC, Lenovo/Motorola, ZTE, Nokia,

11

Ericsson, and Interdigital are GRANTED. The sealing motions at ECF Nos. 1116, 1110,

12

1085, 1090, 1087, 1102, and 1093 are GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.

13

The Court instructs the parties to introduce – if called at trial – redacted versions of their

14

documents consistent with the following tables.

15
16

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 15, 2019

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

6
3:17-cv-0108-GPC-mdd

1
2

ASUSTek’s Appendix A

3
4

Exhibit

5
6

According to ASUSTek
DTX00842

GRANTED.

0000807207
PTX010198

9

Page Bates stamped

GRANTED.

QNDCAL02952131, the
material indicated as a

10

black outline.

11
12

Pages Bates stamped
Pegatron_0000807204 –

7
8

Information To Be Sealed Ruling

AT&T’s Appendix A

13
Information Sought to Be

14
15
16
17

Exhibit

Sealed According to AT&T Ruling

DTX00298

Exhibit in full

GRANTED.

DTX00399

Exhibit in full

GRANTED.

DTX00401

Exhibit in full

GRANTED.

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
7

27
28

3:17-cv-0108-GPC-mdd

1

BlackBerry’s Exhibit A Exhibits

2
Exhibit

3
4

PTX000154

5
6
7

PTX000891

PTX000904

8
9

PTX000910

10
PTX001007

11
12

PTX001238

13
14
15
16

PTX002144

PTX003658

Information Sought To
Be Sealed
According to BlackBerry
Portions highlighted in
blue in Exhibit B to the
Grubbs Decl.
Portions highlighted in
blue in Exhibit C to the
Grubbs Decl.
Portions highlighted in
blue in Exhibit D to the
Grubbs Decl.
Portions highlighted in
blue in Exhibit E to the
Grubbs Decl.
Portions highlighted in
blue in Exhibit F to the
Grubbs Decl.
Portions highlighted in
blue in Exhibit G to the
Grubbs Decl.
Portions highlighted in
blue in Exhibit H to the
Grubbs Decl.
Portions highlighted in
blue in Exhibit I to the
Grubbs Decl.

Basis for Objection

GRANTED.

GRANTED.

GRANTED.

GRANTED.

GRANTED.

GRANTED.

GRANTED.

GRANTED.

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
8

27
28

3:17-cv-0108-GPC-mdd

1

BlackBerry’s Exhibit A Deposition Designations

2
3
4

Depositio Information

5

Deponent

6

Name

7

Grubbs, John

3/1/2018 41:23-42:1

DENIED.

8

Grubbs, John

3/1/2018 42:11-14

DENIED.

9

Grubbs, John

3/1/2018 42:23-25

DENIED.

10

Grubbs, John

3/1/2018 43:2-6

DENIED.

11

Grubbs, John

3/1/2018 43:9

DENIED.

12

Grubbs, John

3/1/2018 46:16-19

DENIED.

13

Grubbs, John

3/1/2018 75:3

DENIED.

Grubbs, John

3/1/2018 76:22

DENIED.

Grubbs, John

3/1/2018 182:22-25

DENIED.

Grubbs, John

3/1/2018 197:19-198:5 GRANTED.

Grubbs, John

3/1/2018 198:21-199:6 GRANTED.

Grubbs, John

3/1/2018 199:8-199:18 GRANTED.

Grubbs, John

3/1/2018 236:1-7

GRANTED.

Grubbs, John

3/1/2018 253:3-6

GRANTED.

Grubbs, John

3/1/2018 253:12-21

GRANTED.

Grubbs, John

3/1/2018 254:1-5

GRANTED.

Grubbs, John

3/1/2018 257:25-258:6 GRANTED.

Grubbs, John

3/1/2018 259:1-9

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

n Date

Sought to Be Basis for Objection
Sealed

GRANTED.

26
9

27
28

3:17-cv-0108-GPC-mdd

1

Broadcom’s Appendix A Exhibits

2
3
4
5
6
7

Exhibit
DTX00523
(BCRM00238)

Information Sought
to Be Sealed
By Broadcom
BCRM000239
-250

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

DENIED as overbroad. The Court
instructs the party to confer and
submit narrower redactions.
DENIED.

DTX00526/PTX00 2235
(BCRM000397)
DTX00529
(BRCM172776)

BCRM00397399
Entirety

DTX00532
(BRCM173163)

Entirety

DTX00535
(BRCM174046)

Entirety

DTX00538
(BRCM175716)

Entirety

DTX00541
(BROADCOMUSFTC00000100)

Entirety

DTX01007
(Q2017MDL3_000
30289)

Entirety

DENIED as overbroad and stale. The
Court instructs the party to confer and
submit narrower redactions.

DTX01005/ PTX03531
(Q2017MDL3_00019 027)

Entirety

PTX00612 (ERICQCOM_SDCA00002083)
PTX001302
(BRCM173791)

Pages 3-29

DENIED as overbroad and stale. The
Court instructs the party to confer and
submit narrower redactions.
GRANTED.

Entirety

GRANTED.

PTX001321
(BRCM176046)

Entirety

GRANTED.

PTX001955
(BRCM174102)

Entirety

GRANTED.

DENIED as overbroad. The Court
instructs the party to confer and
submit narrower redactions.
DENIED as overbroad. The Court
instructs the party to confer and
submit narrower redactions.
DENIED as overbroad. The Court
instructs the party to confer and
submit narrower redactions.
DENIED as overbroad. The Court
instructs the party to confer and
submit narrower redactions.
DENIED as overbroad. The Court
instructs the party to confer and
submit narrower redactions.

8
9

Ruling

25
26
10

27
28

3:17-cv-0108-GPC-mdd

1

Broadcom Appendix A Deposition Designations

2
3
4
5

Deponent Name

Deposition
Date

Information Sought to
Ruling
be Sealed by
Broadcom

McGregor, Scott

3/28/2018

17:4-21

DENIED.

McGregor, Scott

3/28/2018

175:23-176:18
176:20-177:18
179:11-180:20

DENIED.

McGregor, Scott

3/28/2018

184:11-24
187:12-188:1

DENIED.

McGregor, Scott

3/28/2018

240:17-24

DENIED.

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
11

27
28

3:17-cv-0108-GPC-mdd

1

Ericsson Appendix A

2
3
4
5
6
7
8

Exhibit
DTX00565

PTX003665
PTX003657
PTX001179

9
10
11

PTX001241

Information Sought to Be
Sealed According to
Ericsson
§§ 7.1, 7.2, 7.3, 7.4, and
7.5; App’x
1; App’x 2
Portion of §§ 2.1 and
3.4.4
§§ 4.1, 4.4
Pages 4, 6, 7, 8, 14, and
15
Portions of pages 15, 16,
17, 18, 19,
and 26
Pages 12, 17, and 18

Ruling

GRANTED.

GRANTED.
GRANTED.
GRANTED.

GRANTED.

12
13
14

PTX001251

15
16

PTX002327

17
18

PTX003066

19

DTX02568
PTX006414
PTX006415
PTX006416
PTX006417
PTX006418
PTX006421
PTX006422
PTX006423
PTX006424

20
21
22
23
24

Portions of pages 13, 15,
22, 69, 84,
and 85
Portions of pages 20, 31,
38, 43, 49,
and 54
Portions of pages 5, 21,
22, 26, and
28
Portion of second-to-last
paragraph
Entire document
Entire document
Entire document
Entire document
Entire document
Entire document
Entire document
Entire document
Entire document
Entire document

GRANTED.

GRANTED.

GRANTED.
GRANTED.
GRANTED.
GRANTED.
GRANTED.
GRANTED.
GRANTED.
GRANTED.
GRANTED.
GRANTED.
GRANTED.

25
26
12

27
28

3:17-cv-0108-GPC-mdd

1

HTC Appendix A

2
3

Will Call Exhibits

4
5
6
7
8
9

Exhibit
PTX003548

Information Sought to Be
Sealed According to HTC
Up-front license fees
amount under §3 of the
SULA (p. 9) and up-front
license fees stated in
letter dated December 20,
2000 (p. 45)

Ruling

GRANTED.

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
13

27
28

3:17-cv-0108-GPC-mdd

1

Other Exhibits

2
3
4

Exhibit
DTX03585

5
6
7

DTX03661

8
9
10
11

DTX04555

GRANTED.

GRANTED.

GRANTED.

QC’s fund payments (annual cap, quarterly
reimbursement cap and expenditure) to HTC under
§§ 1, 2, 3 (pp.1-4, 6), price calculation in Exhibit A
(p. 12) and quarter caps in Exhibit B under Strategic
Agreement (p. 13).

GRANTED.

PTX003789

QC’s contributions to HTC under §§ 2.2, 2.3, and
strategic fund cap and amounts under §§
2.4 and 2.5 of Strategic Fund Agreement (pp. 2 and 3)
QC’s NRE payments to HTC under §2 of NRE and
Development Agreement for Multiple Subscriber
Units (p. 1)

GRANTED.

13
14

16
17

Ruling

PTX003635

12

15

Information Sought to Be Sealed According to
HTC
HTC’s up-front license fee amount under §3 of the
SULA (p.10) and HTC’s
up-front license fees stated in letter dated December
20,
2000 (p. 46)
QC’s contributions to HTC under §§ 2.2, 2.3, and
strategic fund cap amounts under §§ 2.4 and
2.5 of Strategic Fund
Agreement (pp. 2 and 3)
HTC’s up-front license fees amount under §3 of
the SULA (p. 12)

PTX001512

18

GRANTED.

19
QC’s fund payments (annual cap, quarterly
reimbursement cap and expenditure) to HTC under
§§1, 2, 3 (pp. 6-9, 11),
price calculation in Exhibit A (p. 17) and quarter caps
in Exhibit
B under Strategic
Agreement (p. 18)

20
21
22
23
24
25

PTX001609

QC’s reimbursement amounts to HTC (p. 5)

GRANTED.

26
14

27
28

3:17-cv-0108-GPC-mdd

1

Huawei’s Appendix A

2
3

DTX01440

4
5

DTX01454

6
7
8
9
10

DTX15685
PTX001861
PTX001869
PTX001916

11
12

PTX001941

13

PTX001963

14
15

PTX002143

16
17

PTX002914

18
PTX002933

19
20

PTX003122

21
22

PTX003250

23
24

PTX003251

25

PTX003320

26

Yellow-highlighted portions on
pages with Bates ending 1237, 1238,
1239, and 1241.
Yellow-highlighted portions on
pages with Bates ending 5611 and
5612.
Seal in its entirety.
Yellow-highlighted portions on
pages 002-012.
Yellow-highlighted portions on
pages 001 and 003.
Yellow-highlighted portions on
pages 001-004.
Yellow-highlighted portions on
pages 002-005.
Yellow-highlighted portions on
pages with Bates ending 1222, 1224,
and 1226-1230.
Yellow-highlighted portions on
pages with Bates ending 1259- 1263,
and 1268.
Yellow-highlighted portions on
pages 6, 15, 16, 21 and 26.
Yellow-highlighted portions on pages
with Bates ending 1257212573.
Yellow-highlighted portions on pages
with Bates ending 2004320048, and 20050.
Yellow-highlighted portions on
pages 007-009.
Yellow-highlighted portions on
pages 008-010.
Yellow-highlighted portions on
pages 002-003.

GRANTED.

GRANTED.

GRANTED.
GRANTED.
GRANTED.
GRANTED.
GRANTED.
GRANTED.

GRANTED.

GRANTED.
GRANTED.

GRANTED.

GRANTED.
GRANTED.
GRANTED.

15

27
28

3:17-cv-0108-GPC-mdd

1
2

PTX003429
PTX003569

3
4

PTX003616

5

PTX003733
PTX003735

6
7
8

JTX116

9
10

JTX126

11
12

JTX127

Yellow-highlighted portions on
pages 004-007, 011, and 013.
Yellow-highlighted portions on pages
with Bates ending 698 and 701.
Yellow-highlighted portions on pages
with Bates ending 0684-0688, and 0695.
Seal in its entirety.
Yellow-highlighted portions on pages
with Bates ending 1585, 15881595 and 1605.
Yellow-highlighted portions on pages
with Bates ending 7278, 7283,
7285-87, 7291, 7332, and 7334.
Yellow-highlighted portions on pages
010-016, 019-022, 031-032,
040, 046, 054, 055, 056, and 071078.
Yellow-highlighted portion on page 008.

GRANTED.
GRANTED.
GRANTED.
GRANTED.
GRANTED.

GRANTED.

GRANTED.

GRANTED.

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
16

27
28

3:17-cv-0108-GPC-mdd

1

Huawei’s Deposition Designations

2
3

Deponent
Name

Deposition
Date

Ding,
Jianxin

3/12/2018

3/12/2018

100:16-101:7

11

Ding,
Jianxin

12

Ding,
Jianxin

3/13/2018

190:10-13,
250:21-25,
254:2-7

GRANTED.

Yu,
Nanfen

3/14/2018

47:22-48:3

GRANTED.

Wang, Li
Qiang

3/15/2018

26:2-8, 35:8-20,
59:19-23

4
5
6
7
8

Information
Sought to be
Sealed
According to
Huawei
55:1, 60:16,
112:6-11,
122:8-25, 126:1422,
152:20-153:25

Basis for
Objection

DENIED with
respect to
55:1,60:16
122:8-25
126:14-22.
GRANTED as to the
remainder.

9
10

13
14
15
16

DENIED.

DENIED.

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
17

27
28

3:17-cv-0108-GPC-mdd

1
2

Intel’s Exhibit A
Exhibit

3
4

DTX00014

Bates Range
Provided by the
Parties
86601DOC015
482-83

Information Sought to be
Sealed by Intel

Ruling

PDF page 7

DENIED.

5
6
7

DTX00016

86601DOC034
407-8

86601DOC034408 pages
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6,
86001DOC034409 pages
2, 4, 6

DENIED.

DTX00056

AAPL-FTC00100545553
AAPL-FTC0010075365
AAPL-FTC0013214042
INTELQCOM00002 2
031
INTELQCOM00021 4
960
INTELQCOM00021 5
595
INTELQCOM00021 5
821-25
INTELQCOM00035 4
039-44

AAPL-FTC00100547- 49, 51-2

GRANTED.

AAPL-FTC- 00100757,
59-60, 64

GRANTED.

AAPL-FTC-00132140-41

GRANTED.

INTELQCOM000022060; 105

GRANTED.

INTELQCOM000214967980
INTELQCOM000215599- 613

GRANTED.

INTEL-QC0M000215825

GRANTED.

INTELQCOM00048 7
295-299

INTELQCOM000487295- 99

8
9
10
11
12
13

DTX00057
DTX00085

14
15

DTX00635

16
17

DTX00646

18
19
20

DTX00648

DTX00649

21
22

DTX00654

23
24
25

DTX00656

INTELQCOM000354040- 44

26

GRANTED.

DENIED as overbroad.
The Court instructs the
party to confer and submit
narrower redactions.
DENIED as overbroad.
The Court instructs the
party to confer and submit
narrower redactions.

18

27
28

3:17-cv-0108-GPC-mdd

DTX00674

INTELQCOM00223 6
311-12

INTELQCOM002236313317, 320-326

DTX00675

INTELQCOM002458 60470

INTEL- QCOM00245860812; 14-16, 18-20, 22-23, 2526, 29, 31-32, 36, 39-49,
51-53, 56, 60-63, 65-68.

DTX00681

INTELQCOM003057 387481

DTX00692

INTELQCOM004909 037

DTX00704

INTELQCOM007541 46774

INTEL- QCOM003057387,
3923, 395-396, 398-400, 402414, 416-418, 421-429
INTELQCOM004909039-74, 8393, 95
INTELQCOM007541467-74

DTX01426

1

BAIN00051010

Slide nos. 3, 4, 8, 12, 1719, 27, 292

DTX00689

INTELQCOM004269 91113-999

INTELQCOM004269912, 1418, 22-39, 41-53, 56-65,
67-68, 69-73, 77-81, 8385, 88-97, 99.
AAPL-FTC-0035200

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18

PTX001422 AAPL-FTC0035199-200

DENIED as overbroad.
The Court instructs the
party to confer and submit
narrower redactions.

DENIED as
overbroad with
repsect to pages. 9,
12,
14, 23, 49.
GRANTED with
respect to the
remainder
GRANTED.

GRANTED.

DENIED as overbroad.
The Court instructs the
party to confer and submit
narrower redactions.

DENIED.

DENIED as overbroad.
The Court instructs the
party to confer and submit
narrower redactions.

GRANTED.

19
20
21
22
23
24

PTX001457 AAPL-FTC00010253-56

AAPL-FTC-00010255-56

GRANTED.

PTX001496 APL-QC-FTC34560911-31

APL-QC-FTC-34560912, 17- GRANTED.
18, 21-23, 25

PTX002095 INTELQCOM005886 05384

INTELQCOM005886062, 84.

GRANTED.

25
26
19

27
28

3:17-cv-0108-GPC-mdd

1

PTX002135 AAPL-FTC00108170-211

AAPL-FTC-00108182, 188,
190, 192, 194, 195,
208,
AAPL-FTC-001286634- 64

GRANTED.

PTX002450 86600DOC096
994-018

86600DOC097000

GRANTED.

PTX002552 86600DOC097
253-68

86600DOC097258-60,
62-64.

GRANTED.

PTX002575 86600DOC001
657-86

86600DOC001661-63,
66-68

GRANTED.

PTX002594 INTELQCOM008124 586663

INTELQCOM008124587:
Redactions on pages 10, 12,
22, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30,
31, 32, 33, 34

PTX002621 INTELQCOM000420 594607

INTEL- QCOM000420594:
pages 1, 2; INTELQCOM000420596: pages
2, 5, 6, 7, 9
AAPL-FTC-00153047-9

GRANTED.

INTEL- QCOM008077976,
979

GRANTED.

2
3
4
5
6
7
8

PTX002189 AAPL-FTC00128661-65

GRANTED.

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

PTX002762 AAPL-FTC00153047-9
PTX002768 INTELQCOM008077 974
-87
PTX002976 INTELQCOM000498
642 -60
PTX003027 INTELQCOM005100 5299
PTX003458 INTELQCOM005712
072 (native)
PTX003732 INTELQCOM007951
655-711

DENIED as overbroad with
respect to pages 11 and 23.
The Court instructs the
party to confer and submit
narrower redactions.
GRANTED with respect to
the remainder.

GRANTED.

INTEL- QCOM000498644- GRANTED.
652,
656, 658
INTEL-QCOM00510052, 55- GRANTED.
57, 59, 61-69, 71-76,
80, 82-84, 87, 89, 95-96,
98-99
Withhold in full (native)
GRANTED.

INTELQCOM007951655-711

GRANTED.

20

27
28

3:17-cv-0108-GPC-mdd

1

PTX003745 AAPL-FTC00130920-27

AAPL-FTC-00130920-27

GRANTED.

PTX010861 INTELQCOM007541 467

INTELQCOM007541467-69, 7174.
Withhold in full (native)

GRANTED.

INTELQC1065_00077703-05

GRANTED.

2
3
4
5
6
7

PTX011130 INTEL- QC10652_008014960
(native)
PTX011131 INTELQC1065_00077
703 (native)

GRANTED.

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
21

27
28

3:17-cv-0108-GPC-mdd

1

Intel’s Appendix A Deposition Designations

2
3

Deponent
Name

Deposition
Date

Information Sought to be
Sealed by Intel

Objection

4
5
6
7

Wolff

2/7/2018

Constantine

2/16/2018

Keddy

3/7/2018

Keddy

3/7/2018

Eul

3/21/2018

8
9
10
11

124:2-124:4; 124:13-124:14124:16-124:19
3:15:6-17; 317:15-317:22,
317:25-318:1, 318:3-319:3,
320:3-6, 320:9-320:14
113:1-113:4; 113:25-114:12;
115:13-116:2

GRANTED.

123:14-124:8, 124:10-125:3;
125:12-125:23, 127:7-127:22;
129:5-129:11
187:5-187:15

GRANTED.

GRANTED.
GRANTED.

DENIED.

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
22

27
28

3:17-cv-0108-GPC-mdd

1

InterDigital Appendix A

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

Exhibit

Information
Sought to be
Sealed by
InterDigital
Correspondence
in full

Ruling

Exhibit 1 - DTX00266
(APL-QCFTC_15569990)
Exhibit 2 - DTX00856
Agreement in
(Pegatron_0001284829) full

GRANTED.

Exhibit 3 - DTX00861
Correspondence
(Pegatron_1000000001) and agreement in
full

GRANTED.

Exhibit 4 - DTX01363
(Wistron_1000000105)

Agreement in
full

GRANTED.

Exhibit 5 - DTX01478
(Wistron_1000000113)

Agreement in
full

GRANTED.

Exhibit 6 - PTX003767
(APL-QC_00451156)

Agreement in
full

GRANTED.

GRANTED.

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
23

27
28

3:17-cv-0108-GPC-mdd

1

Kyocera’s Appendix A

2
3
4
5
6
7

Exhibit

Information Sought to Be Sealed
According to Kyocera

Highly confidential business
PTX011074 information regarding licenses granted
by Kyocera and certain non-parties
and license payments and royalty rates
agreed to by Kyocera.

Ruling
GRANTED.

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
24

27
28

3:17-cv-0108-GPC-mdd

Lenovo and Motorola’s Appendix A

1
2
3
4
5

Exhibit

Objection

DTX00713 /
PTX002064

Portions highlighted in pink in the unredacted version filed
herewith
under seal as Exhibit A.

GRANTED.

GRANTED.

DTX00736

Portions highlighted in pink in the unredacted version filed
herewith under seal as Exhibit B.

6
7

Info. Sought to be Sealed According to Lenovo and
Motorola

8
9
10

DTX00890 /
DTX10497

11
12

GRANTED.

GRANTED.

DTX02788

Portions highlighted in pink in the unredacted version filed
herewith under seal as
Exhibit D.
Portions highlighted in pink in the unredacted version filed
herewith
under seal as Exhibit E.

GRANTED.

DTX10941

Portions highlighted in pink in the unredacted version
filed herewith under seal as Exhibit F.

GRANTED.

13
14

Portions highlighted in pink in the unredacted version
filed herewith under seal as Exhibit C.

15
16

DTX15716 /
DTX15717

17
18

Portions highlighted in pink in the unredacted version filed
herewith under seal as Exhibit G.

GRANTED.

GRANTED.

PTX002412

Portions highlighted in pink in the unredacted version filed
herewith under seal as Exhibit H.

GRANTED.

PTX002520

Portions highlighted in pink in the unredacted version filed
herewith under seal as Exhibit I.

PTX002027

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
25

27
28

3:17-cv-0108-GPC-mdd

GRANTED.

PTX002540

Portions highlighted in pink in the unredacted version filed
herewith under seal as Exhibit J.

GRANTED.

PTX002546

Portions highlighted in pink in the unredacted version filed
herewith under seal as Exhibit K.

GRANTED.

PTX002596

Seal in its entirety (alternatively, at least redact pages
MOTO- QUAL- 01933600 to 01933608 as
irrelevant to the current litigation and confidential). An
unredacted version filed herewith under seal as Exhibit L.
Portions highlighted in pink in the unredacted version filed
herewith under seal as Exhibit M.

GRANTED.

PTX002597

Portions highlighted in pink in the unredacted version filed
herewith under seal as Exhibit N.

GRANTED.

PTX002598

Seal in its entirety. An unredacted version filed herewith
under seal as Exhibit O.

GRANTED.

PTX002645

Portions highlighted in pink in the unredacted version filed
herewith under seal as Exhibit P.

PTX002775 /
PTX002776

Portions highlighted in pink in the unredacted version filed
herewith under seal as Exhibit Q.

GRANTED.

GRANTED.

PTX002875

Portions highlighted in pink in the unredacted version filed
herewith under seal as Exhibit R.

Portions highlighted in pink in the unredacted version filed
herewith
under seal as Exhibit S.

GRANTED.

Portions highlighted in pink in the unredacted version filed
herewith under seal as Exhibit T.

GRANTED.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

PTX002570

8

GRANTED.

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22

PTX002876

23
24
25

PTX002886

26
26

27
28

3:17-cv-0108-GPC-mdd

Portions highlighted in pink in the unredacted version filed
herewith under seal as Exhibit U.

GRANTED.

Portions highlighted in pink in the unredacted version filed
herewith
under seal as Exhibit V.

GRANTED.

GRANTED.

PTX003083

Portions highlighted in pink in the unredacted version filed
herewith under seal as Exhibit W.

GRANTED.

PTX003110

Portions highlighted in pink in the unredacted version filed
herewith under seal as Exhibit X.

Portions highlighted in pink in the
unredacted version filed herewith under seal as Exhibit
Y.

GRANTED.

GRANTED.

DTX00341

Provisionally seal entire exhibit
until copy provided to Lenovo and Motorola

GRANTED.

DTX00381

Provisionally seal entire exhibit until copy provided to
Lenovo and Motorola

GRANTED.

DTX00395

Provisionally seal entire exhibit until copy provided to
Lenovo and Motorola

GRANTED.

DTX01207

Provisionally seal entire exhibit until copy provided to
Lenovo and Motorola

Provisionally seal entire exhibit until copy provided to
Lenovo and Motorola

GRANTED.

DTX01415

1
2

PTX002895

3
4

PTX002967

5
6
7
8
9
10
11

PTX003393

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

27
28

3:17-cv-0108-GPC-mdd

LGE’s Appendix A

1
2
3
4
5

Information Sought to be Sealed by LGE
Exhibit
Full document

PTX003759

GRANTED.
Definitions of
“Major Snapdragon Subscriber Unit
Model” “Other Snapdragon Subscriber Unit
Model” “Quarterly Indemnity Cap” and
“Yearly Indemnity Cap,” Sections 2.1,
2.2.2, 3.1, 3.2, and select text from
Section 4.1
GRANTED.
¶¶ 238, 245, 247–48

7
8
9

11
12
13
14

GRANTED.

PTX003779

6

10

Ruling

March 30,
2018 Hague
Convention
Testimony
of Hwi-Jae
Cho
PTX002699

Full document

GRANTED.

PTX011259

GRANTED.

PTX011254

Section 1, only “Net
Revenues” and
“Qualifying
Handsets”
definitions; Section
2(a); and column
heading in Exhibit
A
Full document

PTX011258

Full document

GRANTED.

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

GRANTED.

25
26
28

27
28

3:17-cv-0108-GPC-mdd

1
2

MediaTek’s Appendix A Exhibits
Exhibit

Information To Be Sealed By MediaTek

3

Basis for Objection

4
5

DTX00765

MTK_00296018
(customer name)
p. 3 (customer name); pp. 26-32 in full;
pp. 8-9 (customer name)

GRANTED.

DTX00769

pp. 14; 23

GRANTED.

DTX00770

MTK_00523907- MTK_00523910
(last
two columns); MTK_00523913 in
full

DENIED with respect to
page 15. GRANTED with
respect to the remainder.

DTX00780

Sealed in full

DENIED as overbroad. The
Court instructs the party to
confer and submit narrower
redactions.

PTX001787

MTK_00184574
(client name); MTK_00184576 (two
bullet points and customer name);
MTK_001 84577
(customer name)

GRANTED.

PTX002501

MTK_00240759
(paragraph 3); MTK_00240760
(paragraphs 3-5 in top
email, last line on page);
MTK_00240761 (Actions
(1), (3)-(6))

GRANTED.

PTX002904

MTK_00283679 (first three paragraphs on
page and last three paragraphs on page);
MTK_00283680 (first 5 bullet points)

GRANTED.

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

29

27
28

3:17-cv-0108-GPC-mdd

1

PTX003447

pp. 3-18 in full

GRANTED.

PTX003296

Customer names throughout;
MTK_00335942
(second bullet point)

GRANTED.

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
30

27
28

3:17-cv-0108-GPC-mdd

1
2
3
4
5

MediaTek’s Appendix A Deposition Designations
Deponent
Name
Moynihan,
John Finbarr

Deposition
Date
3/12/2018

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18

Moynihan,
John Finbarr

3/13/2018

Information to be
Sealed by
MediaTek
68:17-21
121:10-121:25
122:2
141:14-15
141:17-21
158:16-18
158:21-159:5
159:7-9
163:3-7
271:19-272:22
275:25-276:5
276:21-277:19
323:17-23
323:25-324:9
427:13-17
428:15-429:1
429:13-21
429:23
430:2-7
430:19-431:3
431:10-11
431:13-16
431:18-20
431:22
432:5-8
432:10-13
432:15

Ruling
GRANTED.

GRANTED.

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
31

27
28

3:17-cv-0108-GPC-mdd

1
2
3
4
5
6

Nokia’s Appendix A Exhibits
Exhibit

Information Sought to be
Sealed
DTX01002 Excerpts from the Subscriber Unit License
Agreement between Qualcomm and Nokia,
dated July 22, 2008 (highlighted in red)
Excerpts from the Patent License Agreement
between Nokia Corp., Nokia Siemens B.V. and
Compal Communications,
executed on June 12, 2009 (highlighted in red)

GRANTED.

DTX1207

Excerpts from the Patent License Agreement
between Nokia and Chi Mei, dated March 3,
2009 (highlighted in red)
Excerpts from various agreements between
Apple

GRANTED.

9
10

GRANTED.

DTX546

7
8

Ruling

PTX3357

11

GRANTED.

12
13
14
15
16
17
18

Nokia’s Appendix A Deposition Designation
Deponent
Name

Deposition
Date

Teksler,
Boris

4/20/2018

19
20

Information
Ruling
Sought to
be Sealed
by Nokia
274:9-17
GRANTED.

21
22
23
24
25
26
32

27
28

3:17-cv-0108-GPC-mdd

1

Samsung’s Appendix A Exhibits

2
3

Exhibit
Internal Samsung negotiation report

Ruling
Granted.

4
5
6

DTX01475 at SFT-0036174-76
2004 SULA
Amendment

8

JTX117 at Q2017MDL3_000 17698705
2009 SULA

9

Granted.

Amendment

7

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

JTX119 at SFT- 0000113-199
2018 SULA Amendment
DTX01463;
PTX003795;
DTX01462; and
DTX01462; and
QAPPCMSD0216
3037-068
2018 Strategic Relationship Agmt.
PTX003796; DTX01462; and
PTX003471 at
QAPPCMSD0216 3069-076
2018 Settlement Agmt.
DTX01038; PTX003798; DTX01462;
and PTX003471 at QAPPCMSD0216
3083-097
2018 Patent

Granted.

Granted.

Granted.

Granted.

Granted.

Component Agmt. DTX01464;
PTX003799; DTX01462; and
PTX003471 at
QAPPCMSD0216 3098-113
2018 Tech. Collab. Agmt.

Granted.

DTX01039; DTX01462; and
PTX003471 at
QAPPCMSD0216 3114-133

Granted.

26
33

27
28

3:17-cv-0108-GPC-mdd

1
2
3
4
5

Samsung’s Appendix A Deposition Designations
Deponent Deposition Information Sought
Name
Date
to be Sealed by
Basis for Objection
Samsung
58:22; 58:25
Lee, Injung 3/14/18
GRANTED.
(numeric values)
Lee, Injung

3/14/18

59:1; 59:4 (numeric
values)

GRANTED.

Lee, Injung

6

3/14/18

106:5-7

GRANTED.

Lee, Injung

3/15/18

144:16-18, 25; 145:1- GRANTED.
6, 11-18, 21-23

Lee, Injung

3/15/18

255:19-256:12

DENIED.

Kim,
Yooseok

3/21/18

29:23-30:12

GRANTED.

Kim,
Yooseok

3/22/18

138:1-8

GRANTED.

89:20-90:19

DENIED.

181:9-12

GRANTED.

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21

2/28/18
Kang,
Hojin
(Alex)
Ahn, Seung 3/29/18
Ho

22
23
24
25
26
34

27
28

3:17-cv-0108-GPC-mdd

1

Sony’s Appendix A Exhibits

2
3
4
5

Exhibit

8

Basis for Objection

PTX001474

Q2017MDL1_00779810 - GRANTED.
Q2017MDL1_00779814

PTX001558

Q2014FTC01360358 Q2014FTC01360362

GRANTED.

PTX001567

Q2014FTC01491780 Q2014FTC01491788

GRANTED.

6
7

Information Sought to Be
Sealed by Sony

9
10
11
12

Sony’s Non-Will Call Exhibits
Exhibit

13
14

17

DTX00964

Q2017MDL1_01206693 - GRANTED.
Q2017MDL1_01206698

DTX03027

Q2014FTC00384622 Q2014FTC00384652

DTX03046

Q2014FTC00660708 Q2014FTC00660770

DTX03048

Q2014FTC00702283 Q2014FTC00702315

DTX03148

Q2014FTC02033652 Q2014FTC02033664

20
21
22
23
24
25

GRANTED.

Q2014FTC02577811 Q2014FTC02577815

18
19

Basis for Objection

DTX00882

15
16

Information Sought to Be
Sealed by Sony

DENIED as overbroad. The Court
instructs the party to confer and
submit narrower redactions.
DENIED as overbroad.
The Court instructs the
party to confer and submit
narrower redactions.
DENIED as overbroad. The
Court instructs the party to
confer and submit narrower
redactions.

GRANTED.

26
35

27
28

3:17-cv-0108-GPC-mdd

1

Q2014FTC02755825 Q2014FTC02755829

JTX122

Q2017MDL1_03030090 - DENIED as overbroad. The
Q2017MDL1_03030121 Court instructs the party to

2
3
4
5

JTX123

6
7
8

JTX131

9
10

DENIED.

DTX03201

confer and submit narrower
redactions.
Q2017MDL1_03111128 - DENIED as overbroad. The
Q2017MDL1_03111135 Court instructs the party to
confer and submit narrower
redactions.
Q2017MDL1_03115389 - DENIED as overbroad. The
Q2017MDL1_03115523 Court instructs the party to
confer and submit narrower
redactions.

PTX001269

Q2017MDL1_01206693 - GRANTED.
Q2017MDL1_01206698

PTX001272

Q2017MDL1_01206699 - GRANTED.
Q2017MDL1_01206705

PTX001287

QNDCAL03064520 QNDCAL03064825

PTX001290

Q2017MDL1_01855129 - GRANTED.
Q2017MDL1_01855141

PTX001303

Q2017MDL1_00269206 - GRANTED.
Q2017MDL1_00269228

PTX001517

Q2017MDL1_01445020 - GRANTED.
Q2017MDL1_01445025

PTX001527

Q2017MDL1_01199818 - GRANTED.
Q2017MDL1_01199822

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21

GRANTED.

22
23
24
25
26
36

27
28

3:17-cv-0108-GPC-mdd

1

QNDCAL03527861 QNDCAL03527865

PTX001543

Q2017MDL1_02279480 - GRANTED.
Q2017MDL1_02279483

PTX001545

Q2017MDL1_0260171- GRANTED.
Q2017MDL1_02601716

PTX001546

Q2017MDL1_00289060 - GRANTED.
Q2017MDL1_00289063

PTX001549

QNDCAL04488551 QNDCAL04488558

PTX003683

Q2017MDL1_02322296 - GRANTED.
Q2017MDL1_02322338

PTX003750

Q2017MDL1_03115336 - GRANTED.
Q2017MDL1_03115388

PTX011048

Q2017MDL1_01199710 - GRANTED.
Q2017MDL1_01199715

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

GRANTED.

PTX001528

GRANTED.

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
37

27
28

3:17-cv-0108-GPC-mdd

1
2

Sony’s Appendix A Deposition Designations
Deponent Name

Deposition
Date

Information
Sought to Be
Sealed

Arthur Lee Hill, IV

5/15/2018

32:12-33:12

GRANTED.

Arthur Lee Hill, IV

5/15/2018

33:24-34:4

GRANTED.

Arthur Lee Hill, IV

5/15/2018

37:7-37:15

GRANTED.

Arthur Lee Hill, IV

5/15/2018

74:18-74:20

GRANTED.

3
4
5

Objection

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
38

27
28

3:17-cv-0108-GPC-mdd

1

ZTE’s Appendix A Exhibits

2
3
4

Exhibit

ZTE50296-ZTE50306 GRANTED.
in full

PTX002666

ZTE50942 in full

GRANTED.

PTX2640

Q2014FTC04597436Q2014FTC04597439
(in full)

GRANTED.

7
8

Basis for Objection

PTX002569

5
6

Information Sought to
Be Sealed By ZTE

9
10

ZTE’s Appendix A Deposition Designations

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

Deponent
Name
Blaylock,
Richard
Blaylock,
Richard
Blaylock,
Richard
Blaylock,
Richard
Blaylock,
Richard
Blaylock,
Richard
Blaylock,
Richard
Blaylock,
Richard
Blaylock,
Richard

Deposition
Date
2/27/2018
2/27/2018
2/27/2018
2/27/2018
2/27/2018
2/27/2018
2/27/2018
2/27/2018
2/27/2018

Information
Sought to
Be Sealed
34:2-34:9
228:24229:2
230:20231:9
283:12283:14
283:20284:2
285:12285:13
285:15285:20
316:22317:1
317:6317:16

Basis for Objection
GRANTED.
GRANTED.
GRANTED.
GRANTED.
GRANTED.
GRANTED.
GRANTED.
GRANTED.
GRANTED.

25
26
39

27
28

3:17-cv-0108-GPC-mdd