Pataky et al v. The Brigantine, Inc.
Filing
70
ORDER Granting 65 Plaintiffs' Ex Parte Motion for Approval of: (1) Filing of Certain FLSA Joinder Notices; (2) Mailing of FLSA Joinder Notices to Newly Discovered Potential Class Members. Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 10/03/2017. (ajs)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
NEAL PATAKY, JESSICA CLEEK, and
LAUREN MICHELSON, individually,
and on behalf of others similarly situated,
13
14
15
16
17
Case No.: 3:17-cv-00352-GPC-AGS
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’
EX PARTE MOTION FOR
APPROVAL OF:
Plaintiffs,
v.
(1) FILING OF CERTAIN FLSA
JOINDER NOTICES
THE BRIGANTINE, INC., a California
corporation,
Defendant.
(2) MAILING OF FLSA JOINDER
NOTICES TO NEWLY
DISCOVERED POTENTIAL CLASS
MEMBERS
18
19
20
[ECF No. 65.]
21
22
On May 16, 2017, this Court entered an order regarding notice to FLSA class
23
members requiring that Plaintiff’s counsel file all Consent to Join forms received
24
containing a postmark that is no later than sixty days from the initial mailing date. (Dkt
25
No. 27.) Under the Court’s order all consent to join forms should have been filed by July
26
31, 2017. Plaintiffs’ counsel subsequently received four additional consent forms with
27
postmarks between August 1-August 3, 2017 from potential plaintiffs Israel Dominguez,
28
Crystal Hogan, John Manley, and Misty Perkins (“Additional Plaintiffs”).
1
3:17-cv-00352-GPC-AGS
1
On September 26, 2017, Plaintiffs filed an ex parte motion to approve the filing of
2
the four August forms. (Dkt No. 65.) Defendants filed a notice of opposition to the Ex
3
Parte Motion on September 26, 2017, and filed a response on September 29, 2017. (Dkt
4
No. 66-67.) On September 29, 2017, the Court ordered directed plaintiffs to file a
5
supplemental brief addressing the Helton factors. (Dkt No. 68). Plaintiffs filed this brief
6
on October 3, 2017. (Dkt No. 69.)
7
I.
Late Consent to Join Forms
8
In determining whether a late opt-in consent to join form should be deemed timely
9
in an FLSA action, courts consider: (1) whether “good cause” exists for untimeliness; (2)
10
prejudice to the defendant; (3) how late the consent forms were filed; (4) judicial
11
economy; and (5) the remedial purposes of the FLSA. Helton v. Factor 5, Inc., No. C 10-
12
04927 SBA, 2014 WL 1725734, at *3 (N.D. Cal. Apr. 29, 2014).
13
The Court will excuse the untimeliness of the four additional plaintiffs who sent
14
consent to join forms postmarked after the July 31, 2017 deadline. Good cause exists to
15
excuse the untimeliness as the delay at issue here was not due to any fault of counsel.1
16
Moreover, Defendants are not seriously prejudiced by the addition of only four plaintiffs
17
to an existing class of 118 individuals and allowing the additional plaintiffs to join is
18
consistent with a broad reading of the FLSA in favor of coverage. Kelley v. Alamo, 964
19
F.2d 747, 749–750 (8th Cir. 1992) (“The FLSA ... is a remedial statute that has been
20
construed liberally to apply to the furthest reaches consistent with congressional
21
direction. A generous reading, in favor of those whom congress intended to benefit from
22
the law, is also appropriate when considering issues of time limits and deadlines.”)
23
Most importantly, the Court will excuse the minor untimeliness because the
24
postmarks of the late forms are dated August 1, 2, and 3, 2017, merely a few days after
25
26
27
1
28
Counsel appears to have engaged in a good faith attempt to meet and confer with opposing counsel to
submit this request as a joint motion prior to filing this ex parte motion. (Dkt. No. 65, Exs. 2-4.)
2
3:17-cv-00352-GPC-AGS
1
the July 31, 2017 deadline.2 (Supp. Br. at 2.) Moreover, each additional plaintiff appears
2
to have signed their consent to join form on or prior to the deadline. See (Dkt No. 65-1)
3
(listing 6/10/2017, 7/27/2017, 7/31/2017, 7/31/2017 as the dates the consent to join forms
4
were signed). Finally, judicial economy warrants inclusion of the additional plaintiffs in
5
the current class of 118 individuals in this case. Four additional separately filed but
6
substantively similar actions would not be in the interest of judicial economy. See (Supp.
7
Br. at 3.)
8
9
Accordingly, the Court will excuse the minor tardiness of the additional plaintiffs.
See In Re Wells Fargo Home Mortgage Overtime Pay Litigation, 2008 WL 4712769 at
10
*2 (N.D. Cal. 2008) (rejecting a “rigid application of a ‘good cause’ standard” because it
11
“does not fully respond to the various factors with which the court must concern itself”
12
such as prejudice to the defendant); Helton, 2014 WL 1725734, at *4 (allowing ten tardy
13
opt-in plaintiffs to join FLSA).
The Court Orders Plaintiffs’ counsel to immediately file the four additional
14
15
Consent to Join forms from FLSA class members: (1) Israel Dominguez; (2) Crystal
16
Hogan; (3) John Manley; and (4) Misty Perkins.
17
II.
18
Notice to Newly Discovered Class Members
Plaintiff also requests to send notice to newly discovered class members.
19
Defendant does not oppose this motion. (Dkt No. 65 at 3.) For the reasons stated in the
20
motion and based on the supporting documents, and there being no opposition by
21
Defendant, THE BRIGANTINE, INC., the Court also Orders Plaintiffs’ counsel to
22
commence a notice mailing within ten days, consistent with this Court’s May 16, 2017
23
Order, to: (1) Gustavo Sanchez; (2) Jeffrey Yellen; (3) Fausto Rodriguez; (4) Forrest
24
Gittins; and (5) Kyle Herring. Plaintiffs’ counsel shall notify Defendant’s counsel of the
25
26
The Court recognizes that the exact phrasing in Helton is “how late the consent forms were filed.”
Helton, 2014 WL 1725734. Since plaintiffs are requesting permission to file and have not yet filed these
forms, the Court will consider the extent of the additional plaintiffs’ tardiness as the critical inquiry for
this factor.
2
27
28
3
3:17-cv-00352-GPC-AGS
1
date this mailing begins. Plaintiffs’ counsel shall file all Consent to Join forms it receives
2
containing a postmark that is no later than sixty days from the initial mailing date to these
3
five individuals.
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
7
Dated: October 3, 2017
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
3:17-cv-00352-GPC-AGS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?