United States of America v. RAJMP, Inc. et al

Filing 273

ORDER Granting Joint Motion to Stay and Administrative Closure of the Case (ECF No. 272 ). Signed by Judge Anthony J. Battaglia on 12/22/20. (jmo)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
RAJMP, INC.; JOAN M. POLITTE;
)
MERRILL LYNCH BUSINESS;
)
FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.;
)
CHICAGO TITLE COMPANY;
)
TBC CORPORATION;
)
SC TELECOM, LLC; WELLS FARGO )
BANK, N.A.; PACIFIC WESTERN
)
BANK; OUTFRONT MEDIA, INC.;
)
HALLE PROPERTIES, L.L.C.;
)
POFACO, INC.; COUNTY OF;
)
SAN DIEGO; MIDAS REALTY
)
CORPORATION; KELLY M.;
)
POLITTE as the Personal
)
Representative of the ESTATE OF
)
ROBERT A. POLITTE; TED R.
)
POLITTE as the Personal
)
Representative of the ESTATE OF
)
ROBERT A. POLITTE,
)
)
Defendants.
)
_________________________________ )

Case No.: 3:17-cv-515-AJB-DEB
ORDER GRANTING JOINT
MOTION TO STAY AND
ADMINISTRATIVE
CLOSURE OF THE CASE

1

Having considered the parties’ Joint Motion to Stay (Doc. No. 272), the

2

record contained herein, and for good cause having been shown, IT IS HEREBY

3

ORDERED THAT:

4

1.

The Joint Motion is GRANTED;

5

2.

This action is stayed.

6

3.

The Clerk of the Court is directed to ADMINISTRATIVELY

7

CLOSE this case. The decision to administratively close this case pending

8

execution of the settlement agreement does not have any jurisdictional effect. See

9

Dees v. Billy, 394 F.3d 1290, 1294 (9th Cir. 2005) (“An order administratively

10

closing a case is a docket management tool that has no jurisdictional effect.”).

11
12
13

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: December 22, 2020

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1