Deruyver et al v. Omni La Costa Resort & Spa, LLC et al
Filing
20
ORDER (AGS): The parties' Joint Motion to Amend the Scheduling Order (ECF No. 19 ) is granted. All dates and provisions in the Court's 06/07/17 Scheduling Order (ECF No. 11 ) are vacated and reset as set out in this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew G. Schopler on 09/27/17. (jrg)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
Hadley DeRuyver, et. al,
Case No.: 17-cv-00516-H-AGS
Plaintiffs,
12
13
v.
14
Omni La Costa Resort & Spa LLC, et. al.,
15
AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER
REGULATING DISCOVERY
AND OTHER PRETRIAL
PROCEEDINGS
Defendants.
16
On September 21, 2017, the parties moved to amend the Scheduling Order issued
17
June 7, 2017. (ECF No. 11.) Having found good cause to do so, the parties’ motion is
18
GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. The Court finds circumstances warrant
19
an extension, but declines to adopt all of the parties’ requested deadlines. Accordingly, the
20
Court orders the following with respect to the remaining dates and provisions of the
21
Scheduling Order:
22
1.
All parties must complete all fact discovery by January 8, 2017. “Complete”
23
means that all discovery under Rules 30 through 36 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure,
24
and discovery subpoenas under Rule 45, must be initiated sufficiently in advance of the
25
cut-off date, so that it may be completed by the cut-off date, taking into account the times
26
for service, notice and response set forth in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Counsel
27
must promptly and in good faith meet and confer with regard to all discovery disputes in
28
compliance with Civil Local Rule 26.1(a). The Court expects counsel to make every effort
1
17-cv-00516-H-AGS
1
to resolve all disputes without court intervention through the meet and confer process. If
2
the parties reach an impasse on any discovery issue, counsel must file an appropriate
3
motion within the time limit and procedures set forth by the undersigned magistrate judge.
4
Failure to comply may result in a waiver of a party’s discovery issue. Absent an order of
5
the Court, the Court will not recognize stipulations continuing or altering this requirement.
6
2.
The following discovery limitations apply:
7
Discovery Type
Restriction (per side)
8
Depositions
No more than 20 per side
9
Requests for Admission
No more than 35 per side
Interrogatories
No more than 50 per side
10
Requests to Produce Documents No more than 100 per side
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3.
The parties must designate their respective experts in writing by December 8,
2017. The parties must identify any person who may be used at trial to present evidence
pursuant to Rules 702, 703 or 705 of the Federal Rules of Evidence. This requirement is
not limited to retained experts. The date for exchange of rebuttal experts must be
by December 22, 2017.
Written designations must include the name, address and
telephone number of the expert and a reasonable summary of the testimony the expert is
expected to provide. The list must also include the normal rates the expert charges for
deposition and trial testimony.
4.
By January 8, 2018, each party must comply with the disclosure provisions
in Rule 26(a)(2)(A) and (B) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This disclosure
requirement applies to all persons retained or specially employed to provide expert
testimony, or whose duties as an employee of the party regularly involve the giving of
expert testimony. Except as provided in the paragraph below, any party that fails to make
these disclosures will not be permitted to use evidence or testimony not disclosed at any
hearing or at the time of trial, absent substantial justification. Additionally, the Court may
impose sanctions as permitted by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(c).
5.
Any party must supplement its disclosure regarding contradictory or rebuttal
2
17-cv-00516-H-AGS
1
2
evidence under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2)(D) by January 22, 2018.
6.
All parties must complete all expert discovery by February 23, 2018. The
3
parties must comply with the same procedures set forth in the paragraph governing fact
4
discovery.
5
7.
Failure to comply with this section or any other discovery order of the Court
6
may result in the sanctions provided for in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37, including
7
prohibition on the introduction of experts or other designated matters in evidence.
8
8.
All other pretrial motions must be filed by March 23, 2018. Counsel for the
9
moving party must obtain a motion hearing date from the law clerk of the judge who will
10
hear the motion. The time between the date you request a motion date and the hearing date
11
may vary from one district judge to another. Please plan accordingly. Failure to make a
12
timely request for a motion date may result in the motion not being heard. Motions in
13
limine are to be filed as directed by the Court.
14
9.
A mandatory settlement conference will be conducted on April 23, 2018,
15
at 9:00 a.m. Magistrate Judge Schopler’s chambers. Counsel must submit confidential
16
settlement briefs by April 16, 2018.
17
18
19
10.
Counsel must file their memoranda of contentions of fact and law and take
any other action required by Civil Local Rule 16.1(f)(2) by April 27, 2018.
11.
Counsel must comply with the pretrial disclosure requirements of Federal
20
Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(3) by April 27, 2018. Failure to comply with these
21
disclosure requirements may result in evidence preclusion or other sanctions under Federal
22
Rule of Civil Procedure 37.
23
12.
Counsel must meet and take the action required by Civil Local Rule 16.1(f)(4)
24
by May 4, 2018. At this meeting, counsel must discuss and attempt to enter into
25
stipulations and agreements simplifying the triable issues. Counsel must exchange copies
26
and/or display all exhibits other than those to be used for impeachment. The exhibits must
27
be prepared in accordance with Civil Local Rule 16.1(f)(4)(c). Counsel must note any
28
objections they have to any other parties’ pretrial disclosures under Federal Rule of Civil
3
17-cv-00516-H-AGS
1
Procedure 26(a)(3). Counsel must cooperate in the preparation of the proposed pretrial
2
conference order.
3
13.
Counsel for plaintiff will be responsible for preparing the pretrial order and
4
arranging the meetings of counsel pursuant to Civil Local Rule 16.1(f). By May 11, 2018,
5
plaintiff’s counsel must provide opposing counsel with the proposed pretrial order for
6
review and approval. Opposing counsel must communicate promptly with plaintiff’s
7
counsel concerning any objections to form or content of the pretrial order. Both parties
8
must promptly attempt to resolve their differences, if any, concerning the order.
9
14.
The proposed final pretrial conference order, including objections to any other
10
parties’ Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(3) pretrial disclosures must be prepared,
11
served, and lodged with the assigned district judge by May 25, 2018, in the form prescribed
12
in and in compliance with Civil Local Rule 16.1(f)(6).
13
14
15.
The final pretrial conference is scheduled on the calendar of the Honorable
Marilyn L. Huff on June 4, 2018, at 10:30 a.m.
15
16.
The parties must comply with case management orders set by the Court.
16
17.
The Court will not modify the dates and times in this order except for good
17
18
cause shown.
18.
Under Civil Local Rule 7.1(h), briefs or memoranda in support of or in
19
opposition to any pending motion must not exceed twenty-five (25) pages in length without
20
leave of a district court judge. Reply memorandum must not exceed ten (10) pages without
21
leave of a district court judge. Briefs and memoranda exceeding ten (10) pages in length
22
must have a table of contents and a table of authorities cited.
23
19.
24
this case.
25
Dated: September 27, 2017
Plaintiff’s counsel must serve a copy of this order on all parties that later enter
26
27
28
4
17-cv-00516-H-AGS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?