Estate of Gerardo Cruz-Sanchez et al v. United States of America et al
Filing
42
ORDER Denying as Moot 7 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Roger T. Benitez on 10/10/2017. (knb)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
ESTATE OF GERARDO CRUZSANCHEZ, by and through his successorin-interest Paula Garcia Rivera; and
PAULA GARCIA RIVERA, individually
and in her capacity as successor-ininterest,
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
Case No.: 3:17-cv-00569-BEN-NLS
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO
DISMISS AS MOOT
[ECF No. 7]
Plaintiffs,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA;
CORECIVIC, INC. formerly known as
Corrections Corporation of America
(CCA); C.O. LANDIN, in his individual
capacity; and DOES 1-30, inclusive,
Defendants.
22
23
The United States filed a motion to dismiss the Amended Complaint. (ECF No. 7).
24
Subsequently, this Court granted Plaintiffs leave to file their Second Amended Complaint
25
(ECF No. 40), and Plaintiffs so filed the Second Amended Complaint (ECF No. 41).
26
The filing of a second amended complaint supersedes the amended complaint and
27
renders it a nullity. Therefore, a motion to dismiss targeted at the amended complaint,
28
which is no longer in effect, is moot. Ramirez v. Cnty. of San Bernardino, 806 F.3d
1
3:17-cv-00569-BEN-NLS
1
1002, 1008 (9th Cir. 2015). Accordingly, the United States’ motion is DENIED as
2
moot. (ECF No. 7).
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: October 10, 2017
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
3:17-cv-00569-BEN-NLS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?