Estate of Gerardo Cruz-Sanchez et al v. United States of America et al

Filing 42

ORDER Denying as Moot 7 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Roger T. Benitez on 10/10/2017. (knb)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 ESTATE OF GERARDO CRUZSANCHEZ, by and through his successorin-interest Paula Garcia Rivera; and PAULA GARCIA RIVERA, individually and in her capacity as successor-ininterest, 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Case No.: 3:17-cv-00569-BEN-NLS ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS AS MOOT [ECF No. 7] Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; CORECIVIC, INC. formerly known as Corrections Corporation of America (CCA); C.O. LANDIN, in his individual capacity; and DOES 1-30, inclusive, Defendants. 22 23 The United States filed a motion to dismiss the Amended Complaint. (ECF No. 7). 24 Subsequently, this Court granted Plaintiffs leave to file their Second Amended Complaint 25 (ECF No. 40), and Plaintiffs so filed the Second Amended Complaint (ECF No. 41). 26 The filing of a second amended complaint supersedes the amended complaint and 27 renders it a nullity. Therefore, a motion to dismiss targeted at the amended complaint, 28 which is no longer in effect, is moot. Ramirez v. Cnty. of San Bernardino, 806 F.3d 1 3:17-cv-00569-BEN-NLS 1 1002, 1008 (9th Cir. 2015). Accordingly, the United States’ motion is DENIED as 2 moot. (ECF No. 7). 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 10, 2017 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 3:17-cv-00569-BEN-NLS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?