Davis v. San Diego District Attorney et al

Filing 67

ORDER Denying 42 Request for Rule 45 Subpoena/Request for Relief Via Declaratory Decree. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernard G. Skomal on 3/5/2018. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(mpl)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 GAVIN B. DAVIS, Case No.: 17CV654 JLS (BGS) Plaintiff, 12 13 v. 14 ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR RULE 45 SUBPOENA / REQUEST FOR RELIEF VIA DECLARATORY DECREE SAN DIEGO DISTRICT ATTORNEY, MR. LEONARD TRINH, 15 16 Defendants. [ECF No. 42] 17 18 Plaintiff Gavin B. Davis has filed a request for a Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 19 45 subpoena / request for relief via declaratory decree. [ECF 42] He seeks issuance of a 20 “broad subpoena of all communications between any of the Defendants . . . and the Clark 21 County District Attorney’s Office.” (Id. at 14, Section C, Request for Relief.) 22 “[S]upoenas under Rule 45 are discovery, and must be utilized within the time 23 period permitted for discovery in a case.” See Integra Lifesciences I, Ltd. V. Merck 24 KGaA, 190 F.R.D. 556, 561 (S.D. Cal. 1999) (collecting cases). As the Court explained 25 in its July 14, 2017 Order denying issuance of a subpoena on a different issue, the Court 26 has not issued a case management order allowing discovery to commence because the 27 case is still at the motion to dismiss stage and the pleadings are not settled. (ECF 35.) A 28 motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint has recently been granted. 1 17CV654 JLS (BGS) 1 (ECF 66.) If this case survives the motion to dismiss stage, the Court will set a Case 2 Management Conference and, after consulting with counsel for Defendants and Plaintiff, 3 issue an appropriate scheduling order governing, among other matters, appropriate 4 discovery. 5 Plaintiff’s request for issuance of a Rule 45 subpoena is DENIED. 6 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 5, 2018 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 17CV654 JLS (BGS)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?