Stacy v. Burmax, LLC et al

Filing 20

ORDER on Motion for Dismissal [Doc. No. 18 ]. Signed by Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo on 11/27/2017. (jjg)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 10 11 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA REBECCA STACY, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 14 15 ORDER ON MOTION FOR DISMISSAL [Doc. No. 18.] Plaintiff, 12 13 Case No.: 3:17-cv-0756-CAB-(KSC) v. BURMAX, LLC; NEXT PHASE MARKETING; and JEFF RICHARDS; and DOES 1-50, inclusive, Defendants. 16 17 18 On November 22, 2017, Plaintiff Rebecca Stacy filed a motion for dismissal 19 pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a). [Doc. No. 18.] The Court GRANTS 20 the motion and DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE Plaintiff’s individual claims and 21 DISMISSES WITHOUT PREJUDICE the putative class claims in this action. All 22 parties are to bear their own attorneys’ fees and costs. The Clerk of Court shall close the 23 case. 24 It is SO ORDERED. 25 Dated: November 27, 2017 26 27 28 1 3:17-cv-0756-CAB-(KSC)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?