Grizzle v. San Diego, County of et al
Filing
138
ORDER Setting Briefing Scheduling Re: 137 Defendant's Motion to Compel further Responses to Written Discovery. Plaintiff is provided until April 28, 2021, to timely file a response to the Motion. Defendants are not required to file a reply. The Motion will be submitted on the papers. Unless otherwise requested by the parties or the Court, no formal argument will be heard and no personal appearances are necessary. Signed by Magistrate Judge Ruth Bermudez Montenegro on 4/19/2021. (tcf)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ELLIOT SCOTT GRIZZLE,
12
Case No.: 17-cv-00813-JLS-RBM
Plaintiff,
13
V.
14
ORDER SETTING BRIEFING
SCHEDULING RE: DEFENDANT'S
MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER
RESPONSES TO WRITTEN
DISCOVERY
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
[Doc. 137]
18
19
On April 14, 2021, Defendants, County of San Diego, William Gore, Lena Lovelace,
20
and Aaron Boorman (collectively, "Defendants") filed a Motion to Compel ("Motion")
21
discovery and to deem requests for admissions admitted pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
22
Procedure 37(a). (Doc. 137.) Plaintiff is provided until April 28, 2021, to timely file a
23
response to the Motion. Defendants are not required to file a reply. The Motion will be
24
submitted on the papers. Unless otherwise requested by the parties or the Court, no formal
25
argument will be heard and no personal appearances are necessary.
26
III
27 I I I
28
III
1
17-cv-00813-JLS-RBM
1
2
3
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 19, 2021
~
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
lJ
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
17-cv-00813-JLS-RBM
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?