Garfield Beach CVS LLC v. Palm Care Pharmacy et al
Filing
21
ORDER Granting in Part and Denying in Part 3 Plaintiffs' Motion to Expedite Discovery and for a Preservation Order. Plaintiff's motion for a preservation order is granted. Plaintiff's motion for expedited discovery is denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mitchell D. Dembin on 5/24/2017. (dls)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
GARFIELD BEACH CVS LLC,
Plaintiff,
12
13
v.
14
MOLLISON PHARMACY and
SAMERA YOKOUB,
15
Defendants.
16
Case No.: 17-cv-0879-AJB-MDD
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’
MOTION TO EXPEDITE
DISCOVERY AND FOR A
PRESERVATION ORDER
[ECF NO. 3]
17
In April 2017, CVS purchased El Cajon Express Pharmacy. (ECF No. 1
18
19
¶ 3). Defendant Yokoub was a delivery driver for Express. (Id. ¶ 15). This
20
case stems from allegations by CVS that Yokoub misappropriated customer
21
lists, derived from her delivery logs, that Defendant Mollison Pharmacy has
22
used to lure customers from CVS.1 (Id. ¶¶ 37, 38, 40).
On March 2, 2017, Plaintiff filed the instant motion seeking a
23
24
temporary restraining order, a preservation order, and an order authorizing
25
26
27
Plaintiff, in its Complaint, also sued Palm Care Pharmacy but voluntarily dismissed
Palm Care Pharmacy on May 10, 2017. (ECF No. 14).
1
1
17-cv-0879-AJB-MDD
1
expedited discovery. (ECF No. 3). The motions for a preservation order and
2
for expedited discovery were referred to this Court by the district judge.
3
Defendants responded in opposition on May 15, 2017. (ECF No. 17). Plaintiff
4
replied on May 17, 2017. (ECF No. 18).
As provided herein, Plaintiff’s motion for a preservation order is
5
6
GRANTED. Plaintiff’s motion for expedited discovery is DENIED.
DISCUSSION
7
8
A. Motion for Preservation Order
9
In considering a motion for an order preserving evidence, the court is to
10
consider:
1) The level of concern the court has for the continuing existence and
maintenance of the integrity of the evidence in question in the
absence of an order directing preservation of the evidence;
2) Any irreparable harm likely to result to the party seeking the
preservation of the evidence absent an order directing preservation;
and
3) The capability of an individual, entity, or party to maintain the
evidence sought to be preserved.
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
Jardin v. Datallegro, Inc., et al, No. 08-cv-1462, 2008 WL 4104473 *1
18
(September 3, 2008, S.D. Cal.) (citations omitted).
Although asserting that the facts in support of the motion presented by
19
20
Plaintiff are not accurate, Defendants state that they “do not generally
21
object” to the Court issuing a preservation order. (ECF No. 17 at 2).
22
Although it is not quite clear what the lack of general objection means, the
23
Court takes it that Defendants do not oppose. It is not for the Court to
24
second guess that decision. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion for a preservation
25
order is GRANTED as requested by Plaintiff. (See ECF No. 3-1 at 18-192).
26
27
2
The Court will refer to ECF-generated pagination instead of original pagination herein.
2
17-cv-0879-AJB-MDD
1
B. Motion for Expedited Discovery
2
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(d) states:
3
5
A party may not seek discovery from any source before the parties
have conferred as required by Rule 26(f), except in a proceeding
exempted from initial disclosure under Rule 26(a)(1)(B), or when
authorized by these rules, by stipulation, or by court order.
6
In the instant case, Plaintiff may only obtain early discovery by court
4
7
order. In this Circuit, courts must find “good cause” to determine whether to
8
permit discovery prior to the Rule 26(f) conference. Good cause exists where
9
the need for expedited discovery, in consideration of the administration of
10
justice, outweighs the prejudice to the responding party. See, e.g., Arista
11
Records, LLC v. Does 1–43, 2007 WL 4538697 *1 (S.D. Cal. 2007).
12
Plaintiff asserts that expedited discovery is necessary to determine the
13
extent to which Defendants have disclosed CVS’ trade secrets and
14
confidential information. (ECF No. 3-1 at 19). In support, Plaintiff claims
15
that a number of customers have moved their business from Express to
16
Mollison following the purchase and claims that this is likely a consequence
17
of Defendant Yokoub taking the delivery log and Defendant Mollison
18
Pharmacy using it to contact and divert customers. Defendants, on the other
19
hand, assert that the delivery log, which was returned on April 13, 2017, to
20
Plaintiff, does not contain the customers printed name, address or telephone
21
number and was not used or copied by Defendants. Declaration of Samera
22
Yokoub ¶¶ 9, 10 (ECF No. 15-9).
23
The Court finds that good cause is lacking for expedited discovery. The
24
Court finds that Plaintiff has failed to demonstrate that the need for
25
expedited discovery outweighs the prejudice to Defendants in having to
26
respond to discovery at this stage of the case. The motion for expedited
27
3
17-cv-0879-AJB-MDD
1
discovery is DENIED.
The Court declines to enter a protective order as suggested by Plaintiff
2
3
at this time. The Court encourages the parties, at the appropriate time, to
4
meet and confer for the purpose of presenting a stipulated protective order.
5
In the event of a dispute over the terms, the Court will entertain a joint
6
motion to resolve any issues.
CONCLUSION
7
For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiffs’ Motion for a Preservation Order is
8
9
GRANTED. Plaintiff’s Motion for Expedited Discovery is DENIED.
10
Defendants are ORDERED to:
11
(1) Preserve all copies of CVS’ confidential and proprietary business
12
information, including but not limited to, Delivery Logs, list, or records and
13
all copies;
(2) Preserve any communication(s) related to the use of CVS’
14
15
confidential and proprietary business information; and
(3) Preserve any communications related to Mollison and/or Palm
16
17
communicating with Yokoub about hiring her or paying her for any of CVS’
18
confidential, trade secret or proprietary information, including the Delivery
19
Logs.
20
21
IT IS SO ORDERED:
Dated: May 24, 2017
22
23
24
25
26
27
4
17-cv-0879-AJB-MDD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?