Jiminez v. The United States of America et al

Filing 55

ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 9/24/21.(sxa)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 ELIZABETH JIMINEZ, individually, and as successor in interest of Fernando Geovanni Llanez, deceased; FERNANDO LLANEZ, individually, and as successor in interest of Fernando Geovanni Llanez, deceased, Case No.: 3:17-cv-1205-BTM-AGS ORDER DISMISSING CASE Plaintiffs, 16 17 v. 18 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; CITY OF CHULA VISTA, a public entity; RONALDO RICARDO GONZALEZ, an individual; MARCUS OSORIO, an individual; CHRIS BARONI, an individual; ANGELA SANCHEZ, an individual; MICHAEL BURBANK, an individual; JEREMY DORN, an individual; ANTHONY CASTELLANOS, an individual; MARK MEREDITH, an individual; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Defendants. 28 1 3:17-cv-1205-BTM-AGS 1 On June 1, 2020, the Court consolidated case 3:17-cv-01205 (“Initial 2 Action”) with case 3:18-cv-01269 (“Second Action”) because “the Initial Action 3 and Second Action involve[d] common questions of law and fact.” (Initial Action, 4 ECF No. 54 at 42.) The Court made the Second Action the lead case and stated 5 that “[a]ll further filings in these proceedings . . . shall be made in the Second 6 Action alone.” (Id.) 7 On September 15, 2021, the Court granted Defendants’ Motion for 8 Summary Judgment in the Second Action. (Second Action, ECF No. 40.) 9 Because none of Plaintiffs’ claims remained, the Court dismissed the Second 10 11 12 Action. (Id.) Because the Second Action has been dismissed, this case is also dismissed. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly and close the file. 13 14 IT IS SO ORDERED. 15 16 Dated: September 24, 2021 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 3:17-cv-1205-BTM-AGS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?