Garrett v. People of Illinois, State et al

Filing 4

CLERK'S JUDGMENT. IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Court dismisses this action without prejudice for failure to pay the full statutory and administrative $400 civil filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a), and for lack of prop er venue pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b) and § 1406(a). Also, the Court certifies that an IFP appeal from this Order would be frivolous and therefore, would not be taken in good faith pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3)(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(lrf)

Download PDF
United States District Court SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Johnnie Garrett Civil Action No. 17cv1277-LAB-KSC Plaintiff, V. People of Illinois, State; Ms. Rocsi Diaz; Police Officers; Correctional Officers; Public Defender; Warden; State Attorney; Judge JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE Defendant. Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The issues have been tried or heard and a decision has been rendered. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: that the Court: 1) denies Plaintiff’s Motion to Proceed IFP (ECF No. 2) as barred by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g); 2) dismisses this action without prejudice for failure to pay the full statutory and administrative $400 civil filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a), and for lack of proper venue pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b) and § 1406(a); 3) certifies that an IFP appeal from this Order would be frivolous and therefore, would not be taken in good faith pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). Date: 9/11/17 CLERK OF COURT JOHN MORRILL, Clerk of Court By: s/ L. Fincher L. Fincher, Deputy

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?