Stafford v. Rite Aid Corporation
Filing
289
ORDER: (1) Denying Without Prejudice Motion for Entry of Order Concerning Discovery and Other Pretrial Matters; (2) Setting Status Conference; and (3) Setting Mandatory Settlement Conference (ECF No. 286 ). Signed by Magistrate Judge Allison H. Goddard on 04/12/2023. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(cxl1)
Case 3:17-cv-01340-TWR-AHG Document 289 Filed 04/12/23 PageID.13479 Page 1 of 6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
BRYON STAFFORD, individually and on
behalf of all others similarly situated,
Lead Case No.: 3:17-cv-1340-TWR-AHG
Consolidated with: 3:18-cv-152-TWR-AHG
Plaintiff,
ORDER:
v.
(1) DENYING WITHOUT
PREJUDICE MOTION FOR ENTRY
OF ORDER CONCERNING
DISCOVERY AND OTHER
PRETRIAL MATTERS;
RITE AID CORPORATION,
Defendant.
18
19
(2) SETTING STATUS
CONFERENCE; and
20
21
22
(3) SETTING MANDATORY
SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
23
[ECF No. 286]
24
25
26
27
28
1
3:17-cv-1340-TWR-AHG
Case 3:17-cv-01340-TWR-AHG Document 289 Filed 04/12/23 PageID.13480 Page 2 of 6
1
Before the Court is the parties’ Joint Motion for Entry of Stipulation and Proposed
2
Order Concerning Discovery and Other Pretrial Matters. ECF No. 286. In the Joint Motion,
3
the parties request that the Court dismiss without prejudice Plaintiff Robert Josten and the
4
operative Josten Complaint (ECF No. 146), permit a new additional plaintiff to file a
5
Motion for Intervention by May 1, 2023, and extend the deadlines in the case schedule by
6
approximately four months each. ECF No. 286 at 4. The parties seek such a lengthy
7
extension of the case schedule not only to conduct discovery regarding the anticipated new
8
plaintiff, but also to complete other outstanding discovery, including class-wide discovery,
9
depositions and/or document discovery of third parties, and additional discovery regarding
10
Defendant Rite Aid’s transactional data. Id. at 3-4.
11
Under Fed. R. Civ. P 16(b)(4), “[a] schedule may be modified only for good cause
12
and with the judge’s consent.” “Good cause” is a non-rigorous standard that has been
13
construed broadly across procedural and statutory contexts. Ahanchian v. Xenon Pictures,
14
Inc., 624 F.3d 1253, 1259 (9th Cir. 2010). The good cause standard focuses on the diligence
15
of the party seeking to amend the scheduling order and the reasons for seeking
16
modification. Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d 604, 609 (9th Cir. 1992).
17
“[T]he court may modify the schedule on a showing of good cause if it cannot reasonably
18
be met despite the diligence of the party seeking the extension.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 16, advisory
19
committee’s notes to 1983 amendment.
20
Here, although the Court recognizes that the requested dismissal of Plaintiff Josten
21
and anticipated motion to intervene by a new plaintiff may require some additional
22
discovery, the Court finds the parties have not shown good cause to grant a four-month
23
carte-blanche extension of the case schedule. In particular, the parties have not established
24
that they have acted diligently to complete class-wide discovery, third-party deposition and
25
document discovery, and discovery regarding Rite Aid’s transactional data in the seven
26
months since the stay was lifted in this case (or in the five months since the Court issued
27
the operative Scheduling Order).
28
Given the age of the case and its interest in efficient docket management, the Court
2
3:17-cv-1340-TWR-AHG
Case 3:17-cv-01340-TWR-AHG Document 289 Filed 04/12/23 PageID.13481 Page 3 of 6
1
will require the parties to provide a more detailed explanation of what discovery remains
2
to be completed before the parties are able to brief the class certification motion, and will
3
set deadlines and constraints to ensure that such discovery is completed diligently and in a
4
streamlined manner. To that end, the Court will hold a Status Conference on
5
April 20, 2023 at 2:00 p.m. before Magistrate Judge Allison H. Goddard. The Status
6
Conference shall take place via videoconference using the Court’s official Zoom account.
7
Chambers staff will circulate the Zoom invitation to all counsel of record by April 19, 2023.
8
In the meantime, the parties’ Joint Motion is DENIED without prejudice. 1 The
9
Court will discuss an appropriate scope and timeline for any remaining discovery with the
10
parties during the Status Conference.
11
Additionally, upon review of the record, the Court SETS a Mandatory Settlement
12
Conference for May 26, 2023 at 9:30 a.m. before Magistrate Judge Allison H. Goddard.
13
In preparation for the MSC, Plaintiffs must serve on Defendant a written settlement
14
proposal, which must include a specific demand amount, no later than May 5, 2023. The
15
defendant must respond to the plaintiff in writing with a specific offer amount prior to the
16
Meet and Confer discussion. The parties should not file or otherwise copy the Court on
17
these exchanges. Rather, the parties must include their written settlement proposals in their
18
respective Settlement Conference Statements to the Court. Counsel for the parties must
19
meet and confer in person or by phone no later than May 12, 2023.
20
Each party must prepare a Settlement Conference Statement, which will be served
21
on opposing counsel and lodged with the Court no later than May 19, 2023. The Statement
22
must be lodged in .pdf format via email to efile_goddard@casd.uscourts.gov (not filed).
23
The substance of the Settlement Conference Statement must comply fully with Judge
24
Goddard’s
Mandatory
Settlement
Conference
Rules
(located
at
25
26
27
28
The undersigned notes that this Order is issued upon consultation with the presiding
District Judge, who will ultimately decide the parties’ requests related to the dismissal of
Plaintiff Josten and the anticipated motion to intervene by a new additional plaintiff.
1
3
3:17-cv-1340-TWR-AHG
Case 3:17-cv-01340-TWR-AHG Document 289 Filed 04/12/23 PageID.13482 Page 4 of 6
1
https://www.casd.uscourts.gov/Judges/goddard/docs/Goddard%20Mandatory%20Settlem
2
ent%20Conference%20Rules.pdf). Each party may also prepare an optional Confidential
3
Settlement Letter for the Court’s review only, to be lodged with the Court no later than
4
May 19, 2023. The Letter must be lodged in .pdf format via email to
5
efile_goddard@casd.uscourts.gov (not filed). Should a party choose to prepare a Letter,
6
the substance of the Settlement Conference Letter must comply fully with Judge Goddard’s
7
Mandatory Settlement Conference Rules. All parties are ordered to read and to fully
8
comply with the Chambers Rules and Mandatory Settlement Conference Rules of
9
Magistrate Judge Allison H. Goddard.2
10
Like the Status Conference, the MSC shall take place via videoconference for all
11
attendees, using the Court’s official Zoom account. In addition to complying with Judge
12
Goddard’s MSC Rules, the parties must adhere to the following mandatory procedures and
13
deadlines for the videoconference:
14
1.
The Court will use its official Zoom video conferencing account to hold the
15
Settlement Conference. If you are unfamiliar with Zoom: Zoom is available on
16
computers through a download on the Zoom website (https://zoom.us/meetings) or on
17
mobile devices through the installation of a free app. 3 Joining a Zoom conference does not
18
require creating a Zoom account, but it does require downloading the .exe file (if using a
19
computer) or the app (if using a mobile device). Participants are encouraged to create an
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
The Court notes that Judge Goddard’s MSC Rules require the personal attendance of all
parties, party representatives, including claims adjusters for insured defendants, and the
primary attorney(s) responsible for the litigation at the conference. AHG.MSC.R. ¶ 3.
Named plaintiffs are included in this requirement and are not excused from attendance. If
Plaintiffs’ counsel wish to request the excusal of the named plaintiffs from attending the
MSC, they may do so by joint motion or by email (with opposing counsel copied) at
efile_Goddard@casd.uscourts.gov.
2
If possible, participants are encouraged to use laptops or desktop computers for the
video conference, rather than mobile devices.
3
4
3:17-cv-1340-TWR-AHG
Case 3:17-cv-01340-TWR-AHG Document 289 Filed 04/12/23 PageID.13483 Page 5 of 6
1
account, install Zoom and familiarize themselves with Zoom in advance of the Settlement
2
Conference.4 There is a cost-free option for creating a Zoom account.
3
4
2.
No later than May 19, 2023, counsel for each party shall send an email to the
Court at efile_goddard@casd.uscourts.gov containing the following:
5
a.
The name and title of each participant, including all parties and party
6
representatives with full settlement authority, claims adjusters for
7
insured defendants, and the primary attorney(s) responsible for the
8
litigation;
9
b.
10
An email address for each participant to receive the Zoom video
conference invitation;
11
c.
A telephone number where each participant may be reached; and
12
d.
A cell phone number for that party’s preferred point of
13
contact (and the name of the individual whose cell phone it is) for the
14
Court to use during the conference to alert counsel via text message that
15
the Court will soon return to that party’s Breakout Room, to avoid any
16
unexpected interruptions of confidential discussions.
17
3.
At least one day before the Settlement Conference, the Court will email each
18
identified participant an invitation to join a Zoom video conference. If possible,
19
participants are encouraged to use laptops or desktop computers for the video conference,
20
as mobile devices often offer inferior performance. Participants shall join the video
21
conference by following the ZoomGov Meeting hyperlink in the invitation. Participants
22
who do not have Zoom already installed on their device when they click on the
23
ZoomGov Meeting hyperlink will be prompted to download and install Zoom before
24
proceeding. Zoom may then prompt participants to enter the password included in the
25
26
27
28
For help getting started with Zoom, visit: https://support.zoom.us/hc/enus/categories/200101697-Getting-Started
4
5
3:17-cv-1340-TWR-AHG
Case 3:17-cv-01340-TWR-AHG Document 289 Filed 04/12/23 PageID.13484 Page 6 of 6
1
2
invitation.
4.
Zoom’s functionalities will allow the Court to conduct the Settlement
3
Conference as it ordinarily would conduct an in-person one. The Court will divide
4
participants into separate, confidential sessions, which Zoom calls Breakout Rooms. In a
5
Breakout Room, the Court will be able to communicate with participants from a single
6
party in confidence. Breakout Rooms will also allow parties and counsel to communicate
7
confidentially without the Court.
8
5.
All participants shall display the same level of professionalism during the
9
Settlement Conference and be prepared to devote their full attention to the Settlement
10
Conference as if they were attending in person (e.g., cannot be driving or in a car while
11
speaking to the Court), and should be seated indoors and prepared to appear on camera.
12
Because Zoom may quickly deplete the battery of a participant’s device, each participant
13
should ensure that their device is plugged in or that a charging cable is readily available
14
during the video conference.
15
6.
Counsel are advised that although the Settlement Conference will take place
16
on Zoom, all participants shall appear and conduct themselves as if it is proceeding in a
17
courtroom, including by dressing in appropriate courtroom attire.
18
IT IS SO ORDERED.
19
20
Dated: April 12, 2023
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
6
3:17-cv-1340-TWR-AHG
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?