Nguyen v. Berryhill

Filing 3

ORDER Denying 2 Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. Within fourteen days of the date of this Order, Plaintiff shall either: (a) pay the requisite $400 filing fee, or (b) file a renewed motion for IFP containing the requisite information regarding his ability to pay the costs of commencing this action. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 7/14/2017. (lrf)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case No.: 17cv1406-MMA (NLS) TAM PHAN NGUYEN, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS Plaintiff, v. [Doc. No. 2] NANCY BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. 13 14 On July 12, 2017, Plaintiff Tam Phan Nguyen filed this social security appeal 15 pursuant to Section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), challenging the 16 denial of his application for disability benefits. Doc. No. 1. Plaintiff simultaneously filed 17 a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). Doc. No. 2. For the reasons set forth 18 below, the Court DENIES without prejudice Plaintiff’s motion to proceed IFP. 19 20 DISCUSSION All parties instituting any civil action, suit or proceeding in a district court of the 21 United States, except an application for writ of habeas corpus, must pay a filing fee of 22 $400. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). An action may proceed despite a plaintiff’s failure to 23 prepay the entire fee only if he is granted leave to proceed IFP pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 24 1915(a). See Rodriguez v. Cook, 169 F.3d 1176, 1177 (9th Cir. 1999). “To proceed in 25 forma pauperis is a privilege not a right.” Smart v. Heinze, 347 F.2d 114, 116 (9th Cir. 26 1965). A party need not be completely destitute to proceed in forma pauperis. Adkins v. 27 E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co., 335 U.S. 331, 339–40 (1948). But “the same even- 28 handed care must be employed to assure that federal funds are not squandered to -1- 17cv1406-MMA (NLS) 1 underwrite, at public expense, either frivolous claims or the remonstrances of a suitor 2 who is financially able, in whole or in material part, to pull his own oar.” Temple v. 3 Ellerthorpe, 586 F. Supp. 848, 850 (D.R.I. 1984). 4 Plaintiff does not provide sufficient information for the Court to determine whether 5 he should be granted IFP status. On Plaintiff’s application, Plaintiff does not adequately 6 respond to question 2, part b, which requests that he list “the date of [his] last 7 employment, the amount of [his] take-home salary or wages and pay period and the name 8 and address of [his] last employer.” See Doc. No. 2. Instead, Plaintiff only writes “about 9 2010 or 2011, not sure.” See Doc. No. 2. Also, Plaintiff does not respond fully to 10 question 3, which requires that applicants respond either “yes” or “no” to every subpart. 11 Further, Plaintiff submitted an outdated version of the IFP application form. If Plaintiff 12 wishes to file a renewed motion to proceed IFP, Plaintiff must use the updated form, 13 which he may access on the Court’s website on its “Forms” page1 or by visiting the Clerk 14 of Court’s office in person.2 Plaintiff must answer every question. 15 Accordingly, the Court DENIES without prejudice Plaintiff’s motion to proceed 16 IFP. Doc. No. 2; see Civ. L.R. 3.2. Within fourteen days of the date of this Order, 17 Plaintiff shall either: (a) pay the requisite $400 filing fee, or (b) file a renewed motion for 18 IFP containing the requisite information regarding his ability to pay the costs of 19 commencing this action. If Plaintiffs fail to timely submit payment or a renewed motion 20 for IFP, this case shall be dismissed. 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 23 Date: July 14, 2017 24 25 26                                                                   27 _____________________________ Hon. Michael M. Anello United States District Judge 1 28 https://www.casd.uscourts.gov/Attorneys/Lists/Forms/Attachments/59/AO239_Application%20to%20P roceed%20Without%20Prepayment.pdf 2 The Clerk’s Office is located at 333 West Broadway, Suite 420, San Diego, California, 92101. -2- 17cv1406-MMA (NLS)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?