Moreno v. Paramo et al

Filing 3

ORDER Denying Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a) and Dismissing Civil Action without Prejudice for Failing to Prepay the Filing Fees Required by 28 U.S.C. 1914(a) [ECF. No. 2 ]. Signed by Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo on 8/10/2017. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jjg)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10
11

FRANCISCO MORENO,
CDCR #AP-8200,

Case No.: 3:17-cv-1449-CAB-KSC
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO
PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)
AND DISMISSING CIVIL ACTION
WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR
FAILING TO PREPAY FILING
FEES REQUIRED BY
28 U.S.C. § 1914(a)

Plaintiff,

12
vs.

13
14
15

DANIEL PARAMO, et al.,
Defendants.

16
17

[ECF No. 2]

18
19

FRANCISCO MORENO (“Plaintiff”), currently incarcerated at California Health

20

Care Facility (“CHCF”) in Stockton, California, and proceeding pro se, has filed a civil

21

rights Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (ECF No. 1). Plaintiff claims the Warden

22

and several medical officials at Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility (“RJD”) in San

23

Diego, California, denied him adequate medical care in violation of the Eighth

24

Amendment while he was incarcerated there from January through September 2016. (Id.

25

at 2-3, 22-23.)

26

Plaintiff has not prepaid the civil filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a);

27

instead, he has filed a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28

28

U.S.C. § 1915(a) (ECF No. 2).
1
3:17-cv-1449-CAB-KSC

1

I.

2

Motion to Proceed IFP
All parties instituting any civil action, suit or proceeding in a district court of the

3

United States, except an application for writ of habeas corpus, must pay a filing fee of

4

$400. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a).1 An action may proceed despite a plaintiff’s failure to

5

prepay the entire fee only if he is granted leave to proceed IFP pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

6

§ 1915(a). See Rodriguez v. Cook, 169 F.3d 1176, 1177 (9th Cir. 1999). However, if the

7

plaintiff is a prisoner at the time of filing, he may be granted leave to proceed IFP, but he

8

nevertheless remains obligated to pay the entire fee in “increments,” see Williams v.

9

Paramo, 775 F.3d 1182, 1185 (9th Cir. 2015), regardless of whether his action is

10

ultimately dismissed. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1) & (2); Taylor v. Delatoore, 281 F.3d

11

844, 847 (9th Cir. 2002). A “prisoner” is defined as “any person” who at the time of

12

filing is “incarcerated or detained in any facility who is accused of, convicted of,

13

sentenced for, or adjudicated delinquent for, violations of criminal law or the terms or

14

conditions of parole, probation, pretrial release, or diversionary program.” 28 U.S.C.

15

§ 1915(h); Taylor, 281 F.3d at 847.

16

In order to comply with the PLRA, prisoners seeking leave to proceed IFP must

17

also submit a “certified copy of the[ir] trust fund account statement (or institutional

18

equivalent) . . . for the 6-month period immediately preceding the filing of the

19

complaint.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). From the certified trust account statement, the Court

20

assesses an initial payment of 20% of (a) the average monthly deposits in the account for

21

the past six months, or (b) the average monthly balance in the account for the past six

22

months, whichever is greater, unless the prisoner has no assets. See 28 U.S.C.

23

§ 1915(b)(1), (4); see Taylor, 281 F.3d at 850. Thereafter, the institution having custody

24

of the prisoner collects subsequent payments, assessed at 20% of the preceding month’s

25
26
27
28

1

In addition to the $350 statutory fee, civil litigants must pay an additional administrative
fee of $50. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) (Judicial Conference Schedule of Fees, District Court
Misc. Fee Schedule, § 14 (eff. Dec. 1, 2014). The additional $50 administrative fee does
not apply to persons granted leave to proceed IFP. Id.
2
3:17-cv-1449-CAB-KSC

1

income, in any month in which the prisoner’s account exceeds $10, and forwards them to

2

the Court until the entire filing fee is paid. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2).

3

While Plaintiff has filed a Motion to Proceed IFP pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a),

4

he has not attached a certified copy of his CHCF trust account statements for the 6-month

5

period immediately preceding the filing of his Complaint. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2);

6

S.D. CAL. CIVLR 3.2. Section 1915(a)(2) clearly requires that prisoners “seeking to bring

7

a civil action ... without prepayment of fees ... shall submit a certified copy of the trust

8

fund account statement (or institutional equivalent) . . . for the 6-month period

9

immediately preceding the filing of the complaint.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2) (emphasis

10

added).
Without Plaintiff’s trust account statement, the Court is simply unable to assess the

11
12

appropriate amount of the initial filing fee which is statutorily required to initiate the

13

prosecution of this action. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1).

14

II.

Conclusion and Order

15

For these reasons, IT IS ORDERED that:

16

(1)

Plaintiff’s Motion to Proceed IFP (ECF No. 2) is DENIED and the action is

17

DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to prepay the $400 filing fee required by 28

18

U.S.C. § 1914(a).

19

(2)

Plaintiff is GRANTED forty-five (45) days from the date of this Order in

20

which to re-open his case by either: (1) paying the entire $400 statutory and

21

administrative filing fee, or (2) filing a new Motion to Proceed IFP, which includes a

22

certified copy of his trust account statement for the 6-month period preceding the filing of

23

his Complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2) and S.D. CAL. CIVLR 3.2(b).2

24
25
26
27
28

2

Plaintiff is cautioned that if he chooses to proceed further by either prepaying the full
$400 civil filing fee, or submitting a properly supported Motion to Proceed IFP, his
Complaint will be reviewed before service and may be dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915A(b) and/or 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B), regardless of whether he pays or is
obligated to pay filing fees. See Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1126-27 (9th Cir. 2000)
(en banc) (noting that 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) “not only permits but requires” the court to
sua sponte dismiss an in forma pauperis complaint that is frivolous, malicious, fails to
3
3:17-cv-1449-CAB-KSC

1

(3)

The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to provide Plaintiff with a Court-

2

approved form “Motion and Declaration in Support of Motion to Proceed IFP” in this

3

matter. If Plaintiff neither pays the $400 filing fee in full nor sufficiently completes and

4

files the attached Motion to Proceed IFP, together with a certified copy of his trust

5

account statement within 45 days, this action will remained dismissed without prejudice

6

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a), and without further Order of the Court.

7
8

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: August 10, 2017

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

state a claim, or seeks damages from defendants who are immune); see also Rhodes v.
Robinson, 621 F.3d 1002, 1004 (9th Cir. 2010) (discussing similar screening required by
28 U.S.C. § 1915A of all complaints filed by prisoners “seeking redress from a
governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity.”).
4
3:17-cv-1449-CAB-KSC