Woodis v. Law Office of Gary Marks et al

Filing 12

CLERK'S JUDGMENT. IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Court dismisses this civil action both as frivolous and for failing to state a claim pursuant to 28U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) and § 1915A(b)(1) and denies leave to amend as futile. and certifies that an IFP appeal from this Order would be frivolous and therefore, would not be taken in good faith pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(lrf) Modified on 10/17/2017 to update docket text (lrf).

United States District Court
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Deno E. Woodis
Civil Action No.

17cv1527-LAB-RBB

Plaintiff,
V.

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

Law Office of Gary Marks; State of
California
Defendant.

Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The issues have been tried
or heard and a decision has been rendered.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:
that the Court dismisses this civil action both as frivolous and for failing to state a claim pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) and § 1915A(b)(1) and denies leave to amend as futile. Rosati v. Igbinoso, 791
F.3d 1037, 1039 (9th Cir. 2015) and certifies that an IFP appeal from this Order would be frivolous and
therefore, would not be taken in good faith pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).

Date:

10/17/17

CLERK OF COURT
JOHN MORRILL, Clerk of Court
By: s/ L. Fincher
L. Fincher, Deputy