Pressley v. San Diego Sheriff Central County Jail et al

Filing 61

ORDER Granting 60 Plaintiff's Counsel's Unopposed Motion to Withdraw as Counsel of Record. Attorney Douglas S. Gilliland terminated as counsel of record. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 9/9/2020. (tcf)

Download PDF
Case 3:17-cv-01715-MMA-MDD Document 61 Filed 09/09/20 PageID.334 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MICHAEL LAMAR PRESSLEY, Case No. 17cv1715-MMA (MDD) Plaintiff, 12 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S COUNSEL’S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL OF RECORD vs. 13 14 15 M. PACHECO, Defendant. 16 [Doc. No. 60] 17 18 19 Plaintiff Michael Lamar Pressley, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed a 20 Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging violations of 21 his Eighth and Fourteenth Amendment rights by Defendant Pacheco. See Doc. No. 41. 22 Defendant has answered Plaintiff’s allegations and the parties have commenced the 23 discovery phase of litigation. See Doc. Nos. 52, 53. On August 12, 2020, Douglas S. 24 Gilliland, Esq., of the Gilliland Firm, appeared as counsel of record for Plaintiff. See 25 Doc. No. 57. Mr. Gilliland now moves to withdraw as counsel of record based on 26 Plaintiff’s precedent retention of counsel from the firm of Trial Lawyers for Justice. See 27 Doc. No. 60. Mr. Gilliland’s motion is unopposed. See Doc. No. 60-1, Gilliland Decl. ¶¶ 28 6-8. 1 17cv1715-MMA (MDD) Case 3:17-cv-01715-MMA-MDD Document 61 Filed 09/09/20 PageID.335 Page 2 of 2 1 Upon due consideration, good cause appearing, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s 2 counsel’s motion to withdraw as counsel of record. The Clerk of Court is directed to 3 terminate Mr. Gilliland as counsel of record for Plaintiff as of the date this Order is filed. 4 Plaintiff once again will proceed in this matter pro se until such time that attorneys 5 associated with the firm of Trial Lawyers for Justice file a Notice of Appearance as 6 counsel of record for Plaintiff. To the extent attorneys associated with the firm intend to 7 appear on Plaintiff’s behalf, the Court recommends they file their Notice of Appearance 8 forthwith. 9 Finally, the Court DIRECTS Mr. Gilliland to provide a copy of this Order to 10 Plaintiff. The Court reminds Plaintiff that while he proceeds pro se he must comply with 11 Civil Local Rule 83.11 and “keep the court and opposing parties advised as to current 12 address.” CivLR 83.11.b. 13 14 15 IT IS SO ORDERED. DATE: September 9, 2020 _______________________________________ HON. MICHAEL M. ANELLO United States District Judge 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 17cv1715-MMA (MDD)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?