Petrou v. Navient Corporation et al
Filing
20
ORDER: (1) Granting Amended Joint Motion to Continue; (2) Resetting Early Neutral Evaluation Conference; and (3) Resetting Rule 26 Compliance and Case Management Conference (ECF Nos. 11 , 17 ). Early Neutral Evaluation reset for 1/10/2018 at 9:00 AM in the Chambers of Magistrate Judge Jill L. Burkhardt. In the event the case does not settle at the ENE Conference, a Case Management Conference is set for 1/10/2018, and will be held at the conclusion of the ENE Conference. Joint Discovery Plan due 12/28/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jill L. Burkhardt on 12/5/2017.(mxn)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
John G. Petrou,
Case No.: 17-cv-02033-BTM-JLB
Plaintiff,
9
10
v.
11
ORDER: (1) GRANTING AMENDED
JOINT MOTION TO CONTINUE;
(2) RESETTING EARLY NEUTRAL
EVALUATION CONFERENCE; AND
(3) RESETTING RULE 26
COMPLIANCE AND CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Navient Corporation, et al.,
Defendants.
12
13
14
[ECF Nos. 11, 17]
15
16
17
The parties’ Amended Joint Motion to Continue Early Neutral Evaluation
18
Conference (ECF No. 17) is GRANTED. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the December
19
18, 2017 Early Neutral Evaluation (“ENE”) of this case and the dates and deadlines
20
associated therewith (ECF No. 11) are VACATED. The ENE Conference for this case is
21
hereby RESET and will be held on January 10, 2018, at 9:00 AM in the Chambers of
22
Magistrate Judge Jill L. Burkhardt, Edward J. Schwartz U.S. Courthouse, 221 West
23
Broadway, Suite 5140, San Diego, California 92101. In the event the case does not settle
24
at the ENE Conference, a Case Management Conference (“CMC”) pursuant to Fed. R.
25
Civ. P. 16(b) is SET for January 10, 2018, and will be held at the conclusion of the ENE
26
Conference.
27
28
The following are mandatory directions for the parties preparing for the ENE
Conference.
Absent express permission obtained from this Court, and
1
17-cv-02033-BTM-JLB
1
notwithstanding the pendency of any motion, counsel shall timely comply with the
2
dates and deadlines ordered herein.
3
1.
Purpose of Conference: The purpose of the ENE Conference is to permit an
4
informal discussion between the attorneys, parties, and the settlement judge of every aspect
5
of the lawsuit in an effort to achieve an early resolution of the case. All ENE Conference
6
discussions will be informal, off the record, privileged and confidential. Counsel for any
7
non-English speaking parties is responsible for arranging for the appearance of an
8
interpreter at the ENE Conference.
9
2.
Personal Appearance of Parties Required: All parties, adjusters for insured
10
defendants, and other representatives of a party having full settlement authority as
11
explained below, and the principal attorneys responsible for the litigation, must be present
12
in person and legally and factually prepared to discuss settlement of the case. Counsel
13
appearing without their clients (whether or not counsel has been given settlement authority)
14
will be cause for immediate imposition of sanctions and may also result in the immediate
15
termination of the ENE Conference. However, in light of the pending motion to dismiss
16
filed by Defendant Navient Solutions, LLC f/k/a Navient Solutions, Inc. (“NSL”) (ECF
17
No. 5), NSL and its counsel are EXCUSED from attending the ENE Conference. If
18
the pending motion to dismiss is denied prior to January 10, 2017 and NSL remains
19
a party to this action, NSL and its counsel shall participate telephonically in the ENE
20
Conference and any CMC held at the conclusion of the ENE Conference.
21
If each of the principal attorneys responsible for the litigation is not listed on the
22
docket as an “ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED,” then they each shall enter their appearance
23
on the docket as soon as practicable, but in no event later than ten calendar days prior to
24
the ENE Conference.
25
Unless there are extraordinary circumstances, persons required to attend the ENE
26
Conference pursuant to this Order shall not be excused from personal attendance.
27
Requests for excuse from attendance for extraordinary circumstances shall be filed
28
2
17-cv-02033-BTM-JLB
1
as a motion at least ten calendar days prior to the conference. Failure to appear at the
2
ENE Conference will be grounds for sanctions.
3
3.
Full Settlement Authority Required: In addition to counsel who will try the
4
case, a party or party representative with full settlement authority1 must be present for the
5
ENE Conference. In the case of an entity, an authorized representative of the entity who
6
is not retained outside counsel must be present and must have discretionary authority to
7
commit the entity to pay an amount up to the amount of the Plaintiff’s prayer (excluding
8
punitive damages prayers). The purpose of this requirement is to have representatives
9
present who can settle the case during the course of the ENE Conference without consulting
10
11
a superior.
4.
ENE Statements Required: On or before December 28, 2017, the parties
12
shall lodge statements of five pages or less directly to the chambers of Magistrate Judge
13
Burkhardt outlining the nature of the case, the claims, the defenses, and the parties’
14
positions regarding settlement of the case. The settlement position must include a specific
15
and current demand or offer addressing all relief or remedies sought. If a specific demand
16
or offer cannot be made at the time the brief is submitted, then the reasons therefor must
17
be stated along with a statement as to when the party will be in a position to state a demand
18
or offer. A general statement that a party will “negotiate in good faith,” “offer a nominal
19
cash sum,” or “be prepared to make an offer at the conference” is not a specific demand or
20
offer. The statement shall also list all attorney and non-attorney conference attendees for
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
“Full settlement authority” means that the individuals at the settlement conference must be
authorized to explore settlement options fully and to agree at that time to any settlement terms acceptable
to the parties. Heileman Brewing Co. v. Joseph Oat Corp., 871 F.2d 648, 653 (7th Cir. 1989). The person
needs to have “unfettered discretion and authority” to change the settlement position of a party.
Pitman v. Brinker Int’l, Inc., 216 F.R.D. 481, 485-86 (D. Ariz. 2003). The purpose of requiring a person
with unlimited settlement authority to attend the conference contemplates that the person’s view of the
case may be altered during the face to face conference. Id. at 486. A limited or a sum certain of authority
is not adequate. See Nick v. Morgan’s Foods, Inc., 270 F.3d 590, 595-97 (8th Cir. 2001).
1
3
17-cv-02033-BTM-JLB
1
that side, including the name(s) and title(s)/position(s) of the party/party representative(s)
2
who will attend and have settlement authority at the conference.
3
ENE statements shall be lodged via email at efile_burkhardt@casd.uscourts.gov. If
4
exhibits are attached and the total submission amounts to more than 20 pages, a hard copy
5
must also be delivered directly to chambers. Whether these statements are submitted
6
confidentially or whether they are served on opposing counsel is within the parties’
7
discretion. Statements of more than five pages will not be considered.
8
5.
Submission of Magistrate Judge Consent Form: No later than December
9
19, 2017, each party shall provide Plaintiff’s counsel with an executed copy of the attached
10
consent form, titled Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge.
11
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 73.1, if (and only if) all parties have consented to the reference
12
to a magistrate judge, then Plaintiff shall file the consent form(s) in paper format at the
13
Clerk’s Office by December 20, 2017. If the paper format filing reflects consent by all
14
parties, then the form(s) will be forwarded to the assigned district judge for approval. The
15
consent form(s) should not be filed with the court electronically through its Case
16
Management/Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF) system. No consent form will be made
17
available, nor will its contents be made known to any judicial officer, unless all parties
18
have consented to the reference to a magistrate judge. The parties are free to withhold
19
consent without adverse substantive consequences. Questions related to the consent
20
form(s) should be directed only to the clerk’s office at 619-557-5600. Please do not call
21
chambers’ staff with questions related to the consent form(s).
22
6.
New Parties Must Be Notified by Plaintiff’s Counsel: Plaintiff’s counsel
23
shall give notice of the ENE Conference and this Order to parties responding to the
24
complaint after the date of this notice.
25
7.
Case Management Under the Amended Federal Rules: The parties are
26
ordered to comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26 and proceed with the initial disclosure process
27
as follows:
28
4
17-cv-02033-BTM-JLB
1
2
3
4
a. The Rule 26(f) conference shall be completed on or before December 19,
2017;
b. The date of initial disclosure pursuant to Rule 26(a)(1)(A-D) shall occur on or
before December 28, 2017;
5
c. A Joint Discovery Plan shall be filed on the CM/ECF system as well as
6
lodged with Magistrate Judge Burkhardt by emailing the Plan to
7
efile_burkhardt@casd.uscourts.gov, on or before December 28, 2017. The
8
Plan must be one document and must explicitly cover the parties’ views and
9
proposals for each item identified in Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f)(3). The parties
10
should consult both Judge Burkhardt’s and the assigned District Judge’s Civil
11
Chambers Rules in drafting their Plan. A courtesy paper copy of the Plan
12
shall be delivered to Judge Burkhardt’s Chambers if the Plan with its
13
attachments exceeds 20 pages. In addition to complying with Chambers
14
Rules, the Plan must identify whether and what good cause (specific to this
15
case) exists to modify the Court’s tentative schedule for this case. The Court’s
16
tentative schedule is as follows:
17
18
i. Filing of motions to amend pleadings and/or add parties: February 16,
2018;
19
ii. Completion of fact and expert witness discovery: May 25, 2018;
20
iii. The designation and service of expert witness reports: April 6, 2018;
21
iv. The supplemental designation and service of rebuttal expert witness
22
reports: May 4, 2018;
23
v. The date by which dispositive motions shall be filed: June 12, 2018.
24
Motions in limine are to be filed as directed in the Local Rules, or as
25
otherwise set by the District Judge;
26
27
vi. The date for the Mandatory Settlement Conference: August 31, 2018;
and
28
5
17-cv-02033-BTM-JLB
1
vii. The date for a Pretrial Conference before the District Judge assigned to
2
3
the case: October 10, 2018.
8.
Requests to Continue or Reschedule an ENE Conference: Local Rule
4
16.1.c requires that an ENE Conference take place within 45 days of the filing of the first
5
answer. Requests to continue ENE Conferences are rarely granted. However, the Court
6
will consider formal, filed ex parte or joint motions to continue an ENE Conference when
7
extraordinary circumstances exist that make a continuance appropriate. In and of itself,
8
having to travel a long distance to appear in person is not “extraordinary.” Absent
9
extraordinary circumstances, requests for continuances will not be considered unless filed
10
11
no less than ten calendar days prior to the scheduled conference.
9.
Settlement Prior to ENE Conference: The Court encourages the parties to
12
work on settling the matter in advance of the ENE Conference. In the event that the parties
13
resolve the matter prior to the day of the ENE Conference, the following procedures must
14
be followed before the Court will vacate the ENE Conference and excuse the parties from
15
appearing:
16
a. The parties may file a Joint Motion to Dismiss and separately lodge by email
17
a proposed order to the assigned District Judge.2 If a Joint Motion to Dismiss
18
is filed, the Court will vacate the ENE Conference.
19
encouraged to contact Judge Burkhardt’s Chambers by telephone to notify the
20
Court of their pending Joint Motion;
The parties are
21
b. If the parties settle more than 24 hours before the ENE Conference but are not
22
able to file a Joint Motion to Dismiss, they must file a Notice of Settlement
23
containing the electronic signatures of counsel for all settling parties and
24
identifying a date by which the Joint Motion to Dismiss will be filed. The
25
26
27
28
2
See Electronic Case Filing Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual, United States District
Court for the Southern District of California § 2(h), for the chambers’ official email address and
procedures on emailing proposed orders.
6
17-cv-02033-BTM-JLB
1
parties are encouraged to contact Judge Burkhardt’s Chambers by telephone
2
to notify the Court of their filed Notice of Settlement;
3
c. If the parties settle less than 24 hours before the conference, counsel for the
4
settling parties must JOINTLY call chambers and inform the Court of the
5
settlement and receive Court permission to not appear at the ENE Conference.
6
After having reviewed Judge Burkhardt’s Civil Chambers Rules, appropriate
7
questions regarding this case or the mandatory directions set forth herein may be addressed
8
through a joint call by the parties to Judge Burkhardt’s law clerks at (619) 557-6624. For
9
additional information, please see Judge Burkhardt’s Civil Chambers Rules.
10
Dated: December 5, 2017
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
7
17-cv-02033-BTM-JLB
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
John G. Petrou,
Case No.: 17-cv-02033-BTM-JLB
Plaintiff(s),
NOTICE, CONSENT, AND
REFERENCE OF A CIVIL ACTION TO
A MAGISTRATE JUDGE
v.
Navient Corporation, et al.,
Defendant(s).
Notice of a magistrate judge's availability. A United States magistrate judge of this court is
available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action (including a jury or nonjury trial) and to
order the entry of a final judgment. The judgment may then be appealed directly to the United
States court of appeals like any other judgment of this court. A magistrate judge may exercise this
authority only if all parties voluntarily consent.
You may consent to have your case referred to a magistrate judge, or you may withhold your
consent without adverse substantive consequences. The name of any party withholding consent will
not be revealed to any judge who may otherwise be involved with your case.
Consent to a magistrate judge's authority. The following parties ☐ Consent / ☐ Do Not Consent*
to have a United States magistrate judge conduct all proceedings in this case including trial, the
entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings.
Printed Names
Signatures of all parties and counsel for all parties
Dates
REFERENCE ORDER
IT IS ORDERED: This case is referred to United States Magistrate Judge Jill L. Burkhardt to
conduct all proceedings and order entry of a final judgment in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(c),
Fed. R. Civ. P. 73, and CivLR 73.1.
Date
United States District Judge
* Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 73.1, if (and only if) all parties have consented to the reference to a magistrate judge,
then Plaintiff shall file the consent form(s) in paper format at the Clerk’s Office.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?