Mirchandani et al v. BMO Harris Bank
Filing
21
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT re 20 Motion for relief from judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 60(b)(6). Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 2/27/2020. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(sjm)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
HARESH MIRCHANDANI and
INDRA MIRCHANDANI,
Plaintiffs,
13
14
15
16
17
18
Case No. 3:17-cv-02090-BTM-BGS
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT
v.
BMO HARRIS BANK, N.A.,
successor to M&I MARSHALL &
ILSLEY BANK,
[ECF No. [#20]
Defendant.
19
20
Before the Court is Plaintiff Haresh Mirchandani’s (“Plaintiff”) motion for relief
21
from judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 60(b)(6). (ECF
22
No. 20.) Notably, this case was dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction on
23
July 16, 2018 based upon the Rooker-Feldman doctrine. (ECF Nos. 17, 18.)
24
Plaintiff did not appeal such dismissal. Because Plaintiff’s instant motion fails to
25
demonstrate any extraordinary circumstances which prevented him from pursuing
26
an appeal of such dismissal, he has failed to demonstrate his entitlement to relief
27
under Rule 60(b)(6). See Martella v. Marine Cooks & Stewards Union, Seafarers
28
Int'l Union of N. Am., AFL-CIO, 448 F.2d 729, 730 (9th Cir. 1971) (“In order to bring
1
3:17-cv-02090-BTM-BGS
1
himself within the limited area of Rule 60(b)(6) a petitioner is required to establish
2
the existence of extraordinary circumstances which prevented or rendered him
3
unable to prosecute an appeal.” (citing Klapprott v. United States, 335 U.S. 601,
4
(1949); and Ackermann v. United States, 340 U.S. 193 (1950))). Nor has Plaintiff
5
demonstrated any other basis for relief, let alone that his approximately nineteen-
6
month delay in seeking relief was reasonable. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(c)(1).
7
Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion for relief from judgment (ECF No. 20) is DENIED.
8
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: February 27, 2020
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
3:17-cv-02090-BTM-BGS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?