Siphengphone v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al

Filing 21

ORDER Granting 19 Defendant Wells Fargo, N.A.'s Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 19 ). Signed by Judge John A. Houston on 10/2/2018. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jdt)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 Somphet Siphengphone, Case No.: 17-cv-02117-JAH-MDD Plaintiff, 12 13 v. 14 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT WELLS FARGO, N.A.’S MOTION TO DISMISS Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Pending before this Court is Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Defendant” or 18 “Wells Fargo”) Motion to Dismiss with prejudice for failure to comply with the Court’s 19 order pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. [Doc. No. 19]. On 20 April 30, 2018, this Court granted Defendant’s motion to dismiss Plaintiff Somphet 21 Siphengphone’s (“Plaintiff”) second amended complaint. See Doc. No. 18. Plaintiff was 22 permitted twenty-days (21) to file a third amended complaint. Id. Approximately twenty- 23 two weeks have passed and Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint. 24 Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s 25 Complaint in its entirety with prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) (“If the plaintiff fails to 26 prosecute or to comply with these rules or a court order, a defendant may move to dismiss 27 the action or any claim against it.”); see Lira v. Herrera, 427 F.3d 1164, 1169 (9th Cir. 28 2005) (“If a plaintiff does not take advantage of the opportunity to fix his complaint, a 1 17-cv-02117-JAH-MDD 1 district court may convert the dismissal of the complaint into dismissal of the entire 2 action.”). Because this concludes the litigation in this matter, the Clerk of Court SHALL 3 close the file. 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: October 2, 2018 6 7 8 _________________________________ JOHN A. HOUSTON United States District Judge 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 17-cv-02117-JAH-MDD

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?