Siphengphone v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
Filing
21
ORDER Granting 19 Defendant Wells Fargo, N.A.'s Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 19 ). Signed by Judge John A. Houston on 10/2/2018. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jdt)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
Somphet Siphengphone,
Case No.: 17-cv-02117-JAH-MDD
Plaintiff,
12
13
v.
14
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT
WELLS FARGO, N.A.’S MOTION
TO DISMISS
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
Pending before this Court is Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Defendant” or
18
“Wells Fargo”) Motion to Dismiss with prejudice for failure to comply with the Court’s
19
order pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. [Doc. No. 19]. On
20
April 30, 2018, this Court granted Defendant’s motion to dismiss Plaintiff Somphet
21
Siphengphone’s (“Plaintiff”) second amended complaint. See Doc. No. 18. Plaintiff was
22
permitted twenty-days (21) to file a third amended complaint. Id. Approximately twenty-
23
two weeks have passed and Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint.
24
Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s
25
Complaint in its entirety with prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) (“If the plaintiff fails to
26
prosecute or to comply with these rules or a court order, a defendant may move to dismiss
27
the action or any claim against it.”); see Lira v. Herrera, 427 F.3d 1164, 1169 (9th Cir.
28
2005) (“If a plaintiff does not take advantage of the opportunity to fix his complaint, a
1
17-cv-02117-JAH-MDD
1
district court may convert the dismissal of the complaint into dismissal of the entire
2
action.”). Because this concludes the litigation in this matter, the Clerk of Court SHALL
3
close the file.
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: October 2, 2018
6
7
8
_________________________________
JOHN A. HOUSTON
United States District Judge
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
17-cv-02117-JAH-MDD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?